Gerald Walpin firing ( talk| | history| logs| links| watch) ( XfD| restore)

I became curious about this deleted article after reading this external commentary. Kathy 9is2 ( talk) 02:40, 27 May 2012 (UTC) reply

What part of the outcome of the deletion discussion do you have a question about? — C.Fred ( talk) 02:49, 27 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Why was it deleted when so many editors supported keeping it? Why was such a notable article deleted? Google shows lots of reliable sources covered this, and that it still gets mentioned three years later. What was the purpose of deleting the article? Why not undelete it? Kathy 9is2 ( talk) 03:19, 27 May 2012 (UTC) reply

• Are you sure you want this article, or do you want this instead:

Gerald Walpin ( talk| | history| logs| links| watch) ( XfD| restore) Jclemens ( talk) 06:11, 27 May 2012 (UTC) reply

• Endorse. Campaign season is upon us. Obama had to settle a dispute that initially arose between a Bush-appointed watchdog and a Bush-appointed prosecutor. He's therefore going to be subjected to the standard partisan criticism whichever way he comes down. NOTNEWS, not encyclopedic absent unusual circumstances. No flaws identified in either of the closes involved. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz ( talk) 16:44, 27 May 2012 (UTC) reply