|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
The song doesn't exist. It's just a made-up song with a photoshopped cover. Bacardimayne ( talk) 21:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Deleted by User:Drmies as G11 advertising. I did not write the article, I am unaffiliated with the company, and I disagreed with his assessment. I can see from the Google cache that it had sources from Kotaku. I asked Drmies to undelete this and then list it at AFD if needs be, am disappointed that he chose not to. - hahnch e n 20:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Wikipedia is not censored. When thousands of sources say that the ISI have supported and continue to support terrorism and insurgents then an article on the matter is needed. A move to a more neutral title would have been the more reasonable option over deletion as was pointed out by the two uninvolved editors who commented. Darkness Shines ( talk) 19:45, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
It is not about whether DQ is involved or not, it is how he could conclude for "delete" when a majority said "keep"? JCAla ( talk) 08:59, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
The song doesn't exist. It's just a made-up song with a photoshopped cover. Bacardimayne ( talk) 21:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Deleted by User:Drmies as G11 advertising. I did not write the article, I am unaffiliated with the company, and I disagreed with his assessment. I can see from the Google cache that it had sources from Kotaku. I asked Drmies to undelete this and then list it at AFD if needs be, am disappointed that he chose not to. - hahnch e n 20:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Wikipedia is not censored. When thousands of sources say that the ISI have supported and continue to support terrorism and insurgents then an article on the matter is needed. A move to a more neutral title would have been the more reasonable option over deletion as was pointed out by the two uninvolved editors who commented. Darkness Shines ( talk) 19:45, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
It is not about whether DQ is involved or not, it is how he could conclude for "delete" when a majority said "keep"? JCAla ( talk) 08:59, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |