|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
More sources added and article is neutral Indiey ( talk) 16:36, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
We were in discussion of the close with Spartaz when he went on vacation. So we are apparently going to skip that step. I will say that the difficulty of getting a page listed has completely surprised me and raised my respect for WP. That said, I thought the delete discussion was going well and pretty much everyone had reversed their delete vote when it was closed. I think this deletion should be reviewed. Blwhite ( talk) 16:25, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
A couple of weeks ago, this deletion review was closed as changing from Delete to redirect. That is some progress, but still not the desired outcome. But one thing that really bothers me was the decision to protect the namesake page from all editing. This is yet another act of administrator abuse, one of the very issues that was brought up during the previous DELREV. There is no reason this title should be fully protected. There was never any edit warring or anyone going against the consensus and changing this title back to an article following the afd, and there was no consensus or even a single suggestion to protect it prior to this action. There is nothing in Wikipedia's page protection guidelines calling for this page to be protected. Shaliya waya ( talk) 06:08, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
More sources added and article is neutral Indiey ( talk) 16:36, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
We were in discussion of the close with Spartaz when he went on vacation. So we are apparently going to skip that step. I will say that the difficulty of getting a page listed has completely surprised me and raised my respect for WP. That said, I thought the delete discussion was going well and pretty much everyone had reversed their delete vote when it was closed. I think this deletion should be reviewed. Blwhite ( talk) 16:25, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
A couple of weeks ago, this deletion review was closed as changing from Delete to redirect. That is some progress, but still not the desired outcome. But one thing that really bothers me was the decision to protect the namesake page from all editing. This is yet another act of administrator abuse, one of the very issues that was brought up during the previous DELREV. There is no reason this title should be fully protected. There was never any edit warring or anyone going against the consensus and changing this title back to an article following the afd, and there was no consensus or even a single suggestion to protect it prior to this action. There is nothing in Wikipedia's page protection guidelines calling for this page to be protected. Shaliya waya ( talk) 06:08, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |