List of tallest buildings in Timișoara ( talk| | history| logs| links| watch) ( XfD| restore)

Seems to me a clearly inappropriate non-admin closure, as there was nothing like consensus in the discussion. There were equal numbers voting for outright deletion and voting for a merge/redirect, so I'm at a loss as to how this represents clear enough consensus for merge/redirect that a non-admin closure becomes appropriate ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ bomb 23:29, 24 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The reason I closed that is because the information is still encyclopedic, yet, as everyone who voted thought, it should not have its own article. So I thought it was pretty clear that merging would be fine. I still do agree that the redirect maybe isn't needed, but it is still fine to have the info in the Timișoara article, is it not? In other words, because no one out of 6 wanted to keep, and the information was still fine, even if it didn't need its own article, a redirect and merge seemed perfectly fine. Does this answer your question? ∙∙∙ Pep per 23:46, 24 September 2010 (UTC) reply

• Overturn and reopen - I was a MERGE voter, which is how this closed, but I felt uncomfortable with a non-administrative closure. Once something hits AfD, it should stick around for a week unless there is a copyvio or a situation where the nomination is withdrawn or a clear snow situation. I still think MERGE is the correct outcome here, but I think in the name of fair play this should be reopened and a full week of debate allowed. — Carrite, Sept. 24, 2010.
• Overturn and re-open. An early NAC of this nature is well out of process. -- Mkativerata ( talk) 03:48, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Ronnie Radke ( talk| | history| logs| links| watch) ( XfD| restore)

Radke's page was previously made as a protected redirect due to its constant recreation despite lack of notability. However, Radke's newest band, Falling in Reverse, now has it's own article, and is therefore notable per criterion 6 of WP:MUSIC. If it is decided that Radke is not notable, his article should be re-redirected to Falling in Reverse's page, respectively. -- ҚЯĀŽΨÇÉV 13 21:20, 24 September 2010 (UTC) reply

• Comment WP:MUSIC 6 is "...a musician who has been a member of two or more independently notable ensembles.". I assume you mean Escape the Fate, the current target of the redirect and the new one? I'll also note that WP:MUSIC is clear that they "may be notable", they still have to have the independant coverage. I'll also note the article on the new band seems to have questions about it's notability also. As such I suspect the current redirect is the most logical. -- 82.7.40.7 ( talk) 08:31, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
• His band was also deleted at AfD, despite constant recreation: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Falling In Reverse. Jayjg ^(talk) 16:48, 27 September 2010 (UTC) reply
• Keep deleted and keep as a redirect to Escape the Fate. Ronnie Radke fails WP:BAND criterion 6 because consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Falling In Reverse determined the band to be non-notable. Cunard ( talk) 18:19, 1 October 2010 (UTC) reply