|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Hello, about 6 months ago I made 2 pages and improved 1, all of these pages I accidently copied and pasted copyrighted information. When I went to create and improve the pages I didn't really give much thought to using the copyrighted data. I've fixed the pages as much the best I could without violating or using any of the copyrighted information. I tried replacing the copyrighted information with information that I already knew. I think that since the articles have very little value, I think it would be best if you could please delete them. User:BennyK95 March 18, 2010, 19:39 (UTC)
With regards to Gregorian Mass: I think since Wikipedia is not a Catholic encyclopedia and some of the information that I tried to make it look better is still copyrighted, maybe delete the article. I could revise Gregorian mass and get permission to use the information on the page. I think for the mean-time I will put an under-construction template so people will come back later when we have decided what to do. User:BennyK95 March 19 16:19 2010 (UTC)
- BennyK95 - Talk 17:06 March 19 2010 (UTC)
Gregorian mass does have on line that is considered copyvio. So if I can remove that one line then you can restore it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BennyK95 ( talk • contribs) 16:40, 22 March 2010 (UTC) |
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Hi! I am reviewing this image at Commons, where it lacks information about source. It only says "{PD-old} from en wiki John James Audubon" [1]. FTR, deletion log here says
I don't need to restore the en: page, what I ask for is that you tell me if there were more information on the en: page than there is currently on commons: one, in order to complete the latter. Thanks for your help. -- ArséniureDeGallium ( talk) 17:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Hello, about 6 months ago I made 2 pages and improved 1, all of these pages I accidently copied and pasted copyrighted information. When I went to create and improve the pages I didn't really give much thought to using the copyrighted data. I've fixed the pages as much the best I could without violating or using any of the copyrighted information. I tried replacing the copyrighted information with information that I already knew. I think that since the articles have very little value, I think it would be best if you could please delete them. User:BennyK95 March 18, 2010, 19:39 (UTC)
With regards to Gregorian Mass: I think since Wikipedia is not a Catholic encyclopedia and some of the information that I tried to make it look better is still copyrighted, maybe delete the article. I could revise Gregorian mass and get permission to use the information on the page. I think for the mean-time I will put an under-construction template so people will come back later when we have decided what to do. User:BennyK95 March 19 16:19 2010 (UTC)
- BennyK95 - Talk 17:06 March 19 2010 (UTC)
Gregorian mass does have on line that is considered copyvio. So if I can remove that one line then you can restore it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BennyK95 ( talk • contribs) 16:40, 22 March 2010 (UTC) |
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Hi! I am reviewing this image at Commons, where it lacks information about source. It only says "{PD-old} from en wiki John James Audubon" [1]. FTR, deletion log here says
I don't need to restore the en: page, what I ask for is that you tell me if there were more information on the en: page than there is currently on commons: one, in order to complete the latter. Thanks for your help. -- ArséniureDeGallium ( talk) 17:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |