18 May 2009
|
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
5 "deletes" (including nominator) citing established guidelines and one "redirect". On the "keep" side, User:Mahmud200, an editor with a whopping 4 contributions, uses "next big thing" and User:Whadaheck uses "there aren't any sources, but they have fans". Who knows who the anon is, but his argument seems to be "foreign Wikipedias haven't deleted it yet". Numerically, the deletes have it, and once the arguments are weighted, it's nearly a slam dunk. I've discussed it with the closing admin, and he seems to place a lot of weight on the IP's argument, which is one of the worst I've encountered. On my talk page, he summarizes it as "Other language editions have articles on this subject, which means it is considered notable", which isn't any better than my summarization of it: policies and guidelines in foreign language Wikipedias have nothing to do with our policies and guidelines. Our guidelines indicate that this article should be deleted, not kept. — Kww( talk) 01:04, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
18 May 2009
|
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
5 "deletes" (including nominator) citing established guidelines and one "redirect". On the "keep" side, User:Mahmud200, an editor with a whopping 4 contributions, uses "next big thing" and User:Whadaheck uses "there aren't any sources, but they have fans". Who knows who the anon is, but his argument seems to be "foreign Wikipedias haven't deleted it yet". Numerically, the deletes have it, and once the arguments are weighted, it's nearly a slam dunk. I've discussed it with the closing admin, and he seems to place a lot of weight on the IP's argument, which is one of the worst I've encountered. On my talk page, he summarizes it as "Other language editions have articles on this subject, which means it is considered notable", which isn't any better than my summarization of it: policies and guidelines in foreign language Wikipedias have nothing to do with our policies and guidelines. Our guidelines indicate that this article should be deleted, not kept. — Kww( talk) 01:04, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |