From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

13 December 2009

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.
Slip-n-Slide Records ( talk| | history| logs| links| watch) ( restore)

Although this label is notable, because of a lack of sources an administrator (unfamiliar with the subject of hip hop music?) deleted it assuming that it failed WP:MUSIC. I wrote a draft of this article from scratch; this label has signed several notable rap artists so it should have an article. Andrewlp1991 ( talk) 23:02, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Looks like an expired prod so should be restorable immediately on request, so this DRV isn't really needed. One point though, a lack of sources is an entirely appropriate reason to delete, verifiability determines that things should be sourceable. If articles meet the verifiability requirement, then familiarity is a non-issue, in fact if the existance relies solely on familiarity, then original reasearch is likely an issue. -- 82.7.40.7 ( talk) 23:18, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply
  • I've restored the article. PROD is meant to be uncontroversial, and upon essentially any request, PROD deletions are reversed so a DRV isn't necessary. Andrew, not sure if you knew, but I was simply deleting the article out of process (going through the list of expiring PRODs), and since the nomination looked reasonable, I deleted it. Regards, Jamie S93 00:58, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

13 December 2009

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.
Slip-n-Slide Records ( talk| | history| logs| links| watch) ( restore)

Although this label is notable, because of a lack of sources an administrator (unfamiliar with the subject of hip hop music?) deleted it assuming that it failed WP:MUSIC. I wrote a draft of this article from scratch; this label has signed several notable rap artists so it should have an article. Andrewlp1991 ( talk) 23:02, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Looks like an expired prod so should be restorable immediately on request, so this DRV isn't really needed. One point though, a lack of sources is an entirely appropriate reason to delete, verifiability determines that things should be sourceable. If articles meet the verifiability requirement, then familiarity is a non-issue, in fact if the existance relies solely on familiarity, then original reasearch is likely an issue. -- 82.7.40.7 ( talk) 23:18, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply
  • I've restored the article. PROD is meant to be uncontroversial, and upon essentially any request, PROD deletions are reversed so a DRV isn't necessary. Andrew, not sure if you knew, but I was simply deleting the article out of process (going through the list of expiring PRODs), and since the nomination looked reasonable, I deleted it. Regards, Jamie S93 00:58, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook