|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
This organization meets notability requirements and secondary sources were provided on the talk page. George Nethercutt is a well known politician who many have seen as a candidate who is "waiting in the wings" for a future run at high office. The foundation is active and is recruiting students at multiple universities. The likelihood that people will look for it here are high.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Floridan ( talk • contribs) 17:58, July 17, 2008
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Article was deleted under PROD, even though there only appeared to be content issues. I think it could be developed into a good article, particularly if you bring in the qualities of various facilities of different clubs in different sports. Jmorrison230582 ( talk) 06:00, 17 July 2008 (UTC) |
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
This, and Template:Oppose were deleted, it seems, on the basis that loading a little green tick annoyed someone, and that voting goes against consensus. However, I feel there are places where voting is appropriate - for instance when deciding on an image to use from several possibles, in an RfA, etc - and that these templates provided a useful tool to help people pick out the votes on proposals. Yes there are situations where they are not appropriate, but they should be available for those situations where voting IS appropriate. - mattbuck ( Talk) 00:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
This organization meets notability requirements and secondary sources were provided on the talk page. George Nethercutt is a well known politician who many have seen as a candidate who is "waiting in the wings" for a future run at high office. The foundation is active and is recruiting students at multiple universities. The likelihood that people will look for it here are high.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Floridan ( talk • contribs) 17:58, July 17, 2008
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Article was deleted under PROD, even though there only appeared to be content issues. I think it could be developed into a good article, particularly if you bring in the qualities of various facilities of different clubs in different sports. Jmorrison230582 ( talk) 06:00, 17 July 2008 (UTC) |
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
This, and Template:Oppose were deleted, it seems, on the basis that loading a little green tick annoyed someone, and that voting goes against consensus. However, I feel there are places where voting is appropriate - for instance when deciding on an image to use from several possibles, in an RfA, etc - and that these templates provided a useful tool to help people pick out the votes on proposals. Yes there are situations where they are not appropriate, but they should be available for those situations where voting IS appropriate. - mattbuck ( Talk) 00:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |