|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Deleted in 2005 because it was a "message board that has one thread" and "a possible hoax". Suspicions were probably well-founded at the time, but now it is a well-known website frequently listed next to Wikitruth as a forum for criticism of Wikipedia [1], [2]. Second link is especially important because it comes from a government agency. I think both websites are equally deserving of an article. Ashibaka (tock) 22:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Given the overwhelming endorsement of the previous AfD, perhaps we should just end this debate at this point, redirect the page to Criticism of Wikipedia, and add the sources I found there. Ashibaka (tock) 16:08, 22 February 2007 (UTC) |
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Initial reason for deletion is references linked back to their website. Although Article was improved with independent sources for notability, there was no further review by the admin and article was deleted. Firet 07:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
As already recently discussed in its talk page, the topic seems to regard a real, current and notable concept. Please read the discussion in the talk page before saying anything. Angelo 01:46, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
web based news journal http://web2journal.com/read/236036.htm New york Times http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/12/business/12web.html?ex=1320987600&en=254d697964cedc62&ei=5088 Tim Berners Lee http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/05/23/business/web.php St Petersberg times http://www.sptimes.ru/index.php?action_id=2&story_id=20365 Japenses english language new site http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/features/culture/20070123TDY18004.htm Hollywood Reporter http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/features/e3i49998ef2b580e2b5461e3dfb1faedb43?imw=Y Academic essay http://lee.webcoder.be/papers/sesa.pdf Numskll 03:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
1) Better Badges was a vital/unique part of UK punk culture & a pioneer in viral promotion. 2) Deleter asked for reference and one was given but ignored. Wwwhatsup 22:30, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
I realize that the page as it stands is not up to much, but I think it could be built on. Wwwhatsup 03:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. I'll try and whack into more acceptable shape by early next week. Excuse me for being a bit green. What I guess is best is to keep it brief and put the unsourced or dodgy sourced info on the talk page? I have the copy of The Face in question. I could rescan it, but where to post, or how best to refer? Wwwhatsup 20:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC) |
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Deleted in 2005 because it was a "message board that has one thread" and "a possible hoax". Suspicions were probably well-founded at the time, but now it is a well-known website frequently listed next to Wikitruth as a forum for criticism of Wikipedia [1], [2]. Second link is especially important because it comes from a government agency. I think both websites are equally deserving of an article. Ashibaka (tock) 22:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Given the overwhelming endorsement of the previous AfD, perhaps we should just end this debate at this point, redirect the page to Criticism of Wikipedia, and add the sources I found there. Ashibaka (tock) 16:08, 22 February 2007 (UTC) |
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Initial reason for deletion is references linked back to their website. Although Article was improved with independent sources for notability, there was no further review by the admin and article was deleted. Firet 07:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
As already recently discussed in its talk page, the topic seems to regard a real, current and notable concept. Please read the discussion in the talk page before saying anything. Angelo 01:46, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
web based news journal http://web2journal.com/read/236036.htm New york Times http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/12/business/12web.html?ex=1320987600&en=254d697964cedc62&ei=5088 Tim Berners Lee http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/05/23/business/web.php St Petersberg times http://www.sptimes.ru/index.php?action_id=2&story_id=20365 Japenses english language new site http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/features/culture/20070123TDY18004.htm Hollywood Reporter http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/features/e3i49998ef2b580e2b5461e3dfb1faedb43?imw=Y Academic essay http://lee.webcoder.be/papers/sesa.pdf Numskll 03:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
1) Better Badges was a vital/unique part of UK punk culture & a pioneer in viral promotion. 2) Deleter asked for reference and one was given but ignored. Wwwhatsup 22:30, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
I realize that the page as it stands is not up to much, but I think it could be built on. Wwwhatsup 03:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. I'll try and whack into more acceptable shape by early next week. Excuse me for being a bit green. What I guess is best is to keep it brief and put the unsourced or dodgy sourced info on the talk page? I have the copy of The Face in question. I could rescan it, but where to post, or how best to refer? Wwwhatsup 20:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC) |
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |