From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

7 December 2006

Bodo – Erroneous deletion speedily restored – 05:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.
Bodo (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)( deleted history)

Deleted version was not the original version of the page; deleted version was severely vandalised version

I created the article here a few days ago as part of my project to add African artists to Wikipedia; originally, it was about this man. Somebody came through after I'd written it, blanked it, and replaced it with "bodo is da bomb and you dont kare" or some such. This was caught, tagged for speedy, and deleted yesterday. I'd like to get the original article back, please, if at all possible. -- User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 01:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Undeleted, that would be my error, I apologize. —— Eagle ( ask me for help) 01:23, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.
Atlético Chorlton – Deletion endorsed – 00:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.
Atlético Chorlton (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)( deleted history)— ( AfD)

Notable football team in the Manchester area. No warning to user who created the page prior to deletion and so no idea who deleted it. Article provides statistical data up to date of the team in question and history of its creation. Adamwjeffers 16:42, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Deletion discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlético Chorlton. Page was correctly nominated for deletion; notification of page creator is not necessary as it is assumed the creator of a page will keep it on his watchlist. — An gr 16:48, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Endorse deletion valid AfD and no new evidence presented. -- W.marsh 17:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Endorse deletion per W.marsh. -- Sam Blanning (talk) 18:46, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Endorse deletion, entirely without problems per process and per policy and guideline. Guy ( Help!) 23:15, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Endorse Deletion Pretty much an open and shut case. EVula // talk // // 23:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Endorse deletion, not AfD round 2. - Amarkov blah edits 02:32, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Endorse deletion per W.marsh. Inner Earth 15:32, 10 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.
The White Rose Society (student group) – Deletion endorsed – 00:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.
The White Rose Society (student group) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)( deleted history)— ( AfD)

Notable national group documented in media outlets. All self-promotion was removed prior to deletion. Article is important for the clarity of other articles such as White Rose and White Rose (disambiguation). Significant association with the original White Rose gives readers especially students a contact point for more information on the White Rose. For example if you wanted to see a play about the White Rose or become involved in activism similar to the White Rose there is only one organization that you will find, The White Rose Society (student group). Colinster 16:38, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply

  • Comment Did the original article have any reliable sources documenting this? If not, then how do we have verifiable information about the connection between this society and the original White Rose society? ColourBurst 18:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
    • No, it had no sources whatsoever; the closest was an external link to their website. [1] I deleted it the first time under G11, and the second time under both G11 and A7. EVula // talk // // 18:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Endorse Deletion It was crap then, its crap now. The Society student group article has absolutely nothing to do with any other White Rose article. EVula // talk // // 18:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Endorse deletion unless notability is asserted and verified by multiple reliable sources; having the same name as something is not an assertion of notability. Even this nomination reads like an advert, frankly. -- Sam Blanning (talk) 18:45, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • comment - I find it suspect to say the least that an attempt was made to tag The White Rose Society (website) for speedy deletion immediately prior to this request for a deletion review. -- BenBurch 20:17, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Endorse deletion and an industrious person ought to go looking for that website getting inserted elsewhere. Geogre 13:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

7 December 2006

Bodo – Erroneous deletion speedily restored – 05:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.
Bodo (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)( deleted history)

Deleted version was not the original version of the page; deleted version was severely vandalised version

I created the article here a few days ago as part of my project to add African artists to Wikipedia; originally, it was about this man. Somebody came through after I'd written it, blanked it, and replaced it with "bodo is da bomb and you dont kare" or some such. This was caught, tagged for speedy, and deleted yesterday. I'd like to get the original article back, please, if at all possible. -- User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 01:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Undeleted, that would be my error, I apologize. —— Eagle ( ask me for help) 01:23, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.
Atlético Chorlton – Deletion endorsed – 00:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.
Atlético Chorlton (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)( deleted history)— ( AfD)

Notable football team in the Manchester area. No warning to user who created the page prior to deletion and so no idea who deleted it. Article provides statistical data up to date of the team in question and history of its creation. Adamwjeffers 16:42, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Deletion discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlético Chorlton. Page was correctly nominated for deletion; notification of page creator is not necessary as it is assumed the creator of a page will keep it on his watchlist. — An gr 16:48, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Endorse deletion valid AfD and no new evidence presented. -- W.marsh 17:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Endorse deletion per W.marsh. -- Sam Blanning (talk) 18:46, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Endorse deletion, entirely without problems per process and per policy and guideline. Guy ( Help!) 23:15, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Endorse Deletion Pretty much an open and shut case. EVula // talk // // 23:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Endorse deletion, not AfD round 2. - Amarkov blah edits 02:32, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Endorse deletion per W.marsh. Inner Earth 15:32, 10 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.
The White Rose Society (student group) – Deletion endorsed – 00:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.
The White Rose Society (student group) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)( deleted history)— ( AfD)

Notable national group documented in media outlets. All self-promotion was removed prior to deletion. Article is important for the clarity of other articles such as White Rose and White Rose (disambiguation). Significant association with the original White Rose gives readers especially students a contact point for more information on the White Rose. For example if you wanted to see a play about the White Rose or become involved in activism similar to the White Rose there is only one organization that you will find, The White Rose Society (student group). Colinster 16:38, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply

  • Comment Did the original article have any reliable sources documenting this? If not, then how do we have verifiable information about the connection between this society and the original White Rose society? ColourBurst 18:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
    • No, it had no sources whatsoever; the closest was an external link to their website. [1] I deleted it the first time under G11, and the second time under both G11 and A7. EVula // talk // // 18:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Endorse Deletion It was crap then, its crap now. The Society student group article has absolutely nothing to do with any other White Rose article. EVula // talk // // 18:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Endorse deletion unless notability is asserted and verified by multiple reliable sources; having the same name as something is not an assertion of notability. Even this nomination reads like an advert, frankly. -- Sam Blanning (talk) 18:45, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • comment - I find it suspect to say the least that an attempt was made to tag The White Rose Society (website) for speedy deletion immediately prior to this request for a deletion review. -- BenBurch 20:17, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Endorse deletion and an industrious person ought to go looking for that website getting inserted elsewhere. Geogre 13:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook