Victor Celorio – Deletion overturned, relisted at AfD – 00:21, 28 December 2006 (UTC) |
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Several deletion votes were changed to keep (including mine) after the requested evidence of notability was added; no new delete votes came in after the info was added. Why ask for the evidence if it's going to be ignored? Dicklyon 22:25, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Image:Geh.jpg – Restored per request – 20:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC) |
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Image was orphaned after Google Earth Hacks was deleted. That article was restored, but the image was not. I don't really even know what the image was. --- RockMFR 19:51, 22 December 2006 (UTC) |
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
List of big-bust models and performers – DDeletion overturned, relisted at AfD – 00:23, 28 December 2006 (UTC) |
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Comment. I think the article should be restored, at least for a while. I feel a need to take some time and study the evidence. Dicklyon 17:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Sunnyside Royal Hospital – One revision restored, AfD optional – 22:47, 22 December 2006 (UTC) |
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Valid entry for Scottish psychiatric hospital. Article had been moved from Hillside, Angus and put into new article. A further editor correctly complained of the copyviol issues; article was tagged {{hangon}} and rewritten. However, article was still deleted. friedfish 14:43, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Bill Rane – Contested prod, restored and sent to AfD – 08:05, 22 December 2006 (UTC) |
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Bill Rane, article concerning important American Artist, 1927-2005, has been deleted for lack of notariety. This indicates a lack of understanding or research in regard to Mr. Rane. The removal does not contribute to Wikipedia but, rather, weakens Wikipedia. Bill Rane is likely the most respected artist to emerge from the Taos Art Colony in many, many years. This can be objectively verified with proper research. Note particularly, the many article concerning Mr. Rane and his Gallery in the Taos News and the Taos Horsefly newspaper. Since Wikipedia recognized the historic importance of the Taos Art Colony (remember that Santa Fe and Taos together comprise the third largest art market in the United States (3 billion per year) outdone only by New York and Los Angeles, does it really make any sense to dismiss Mr. Rane when within that Art Colony is not simply noted but perhaps most noted. Even the RC Gorman, more recognized beyond Taos, credited Mr. Rane as he favorite living Taos artist during his life. It is not possible to delete Mr. Rane from the history of the Taos Art Colony. You need to remove your article on the Taos Art Colony if you believe that Mr. Rane is not notable. Obviously, Wikipedia is concerned with general knowledge but you cannot deny the importance of Mr. Rane and his work to the Taos Art Colony. Mr. Rane is likely the most notable artist to come out of that community in a long time. Since his death, the Taos Art Colony has, if anything, redoubled its appreciation for this artist and his reputation since his death has not diminished there but is, rather, growing rapidly. Mr. Rane's deletion from Wikipedia will not diminish his significance in the American Art World nor will it harm Mr. Rane's reputation as an important artist who may one day be regarded as an extremely imporant American artist in the last half of the twentieth century working in one of America's premier art communities. However, his deletion will diminish Wikipedia because it will demonstrate the lack of knowledge of, and understanding within, the American Art World. You need to carefully review your decision on this one. You need to find someone whose knowledge of the Taos Art Colony you respect in order to clear this up. You cannot delete this article without exposing a lack of knowledge for the Taos Art Colony and its importance to American Culture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.35.122.142 ( talk • contribs)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Young Hot Rod – Deletion endorsed – 00:24, 28 December 2006 (UTC) |
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Young Hot Rod is certainly a notable artist. You say being signed to G-Unit Records is not notable? You say having your single played on BET, MusicChoice, and Journey's Fashion Stores (which does not play very much hip-hop) is not notable? You say being on the cover of XXL's first ever DVD mag is not notable? I say it is. There are several rappers that are less notable such as VL Mike, Glasses Malone, Spider Loc, and so on that you do have articles on. Having every G-Unit artist up except Hot Rod makes him stick out like a sore thumb. Preferrably restore, but if you cannot do that, then at least Unprotect so that someone with more "notable" info can recreate the page. Thank you. Tom Danson 06:35, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
ZGMF-X42S Destiny Gundam – Deletion endorsed – 00:26, 28 December 2006 (UTC) |
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
The article was deleted despite a lack of clear consensus to do so in the AfD, by an admin who admits to lack of familiarity with the subject matter. The article in question is of the title mecha of Gundam SEED Destiny, piloted by that series' main character. If any mecha from the series are notable enough to merit an individual article (and the results of the mass AfD indicate that some are), this one is. Redxiv 02:58, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Phajje ke Paye – Deletion endorsed – 20:47, 22 December 2006 (UTC) |
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Possibly notable, but difficult to ascertain due to multiple possible translations of the name into the English alphabet. Apparently another remade it without going through the proper channels, but I still think it might be notable enough to actually be included on Wikipedia, it's just that it's difficult to find sources due to translation issues. The user in question provided the following links, though [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] and a small mention in a local(for Lahore, anyway) magazine, [8] Vercalos 05:02, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Victor Celorio – Deletion overturned, relisted at AfD – 00:21, 28 December 2006 (UTC) |
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Several deletion votes were changed to keep (including mine) after the requested evidence of notability was added; no new delete votes came in after the info was added. Why ask for the evidence if it's going to be ignored? Dicklyon 22:25, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Image:Geh.jpg – Restored per request – 20:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC) |
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Image was orphaned after Google Earth Hacks was deleted. That article was restored, but the image was not. I don't really even know what the image was. --- RockMFR 19:51, 22 December 2006 (UTC) |
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
List of big-bust models and performers – DDeletion overturned, relisted at AfD – 00:23, 28 December 2006 (UTC) |
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Comment. I think the article should be restored, at least for a while. I feel a need to take some time and study the evidence. Dicklyon 17:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Sunnyside Royal Hospital – One revision restored, AfD optional – 22:47, 22 December 2006 (UTC) |
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Valid entry for Scottish psychiatric hospital. Article had been moved from Hillside, Angus and put into new article. A further editor correctly complained of the copyviol issues; article was tagged {{hangon}} and rewritten. However, article was still deleted. friedfish 14:43, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Bill Rane – Contested prod, restored and sent to AfD – 08:05, 22 December 2006 (UTC) |
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Bill Rane, article concerning important American Artist, 1927-2005, has been deleted for lack of notariety. This indicates a lack of understanding or research in regard to Mr. Rane. The removal does not contribute to Wikipedia but, rather, weakens Wikipedia. Bill Rane is likely the most respected artist to emerge from the Taos Art Colony in many, many years. This can be objectively verified with proper research. Note particularly, the many article concerning Mr. Rane and his Gallery in the Taos News and the Taos Horsefly newspaper. Since Wikipedia recognized the historic importance of the Taos Art Colony (remember that Santa Fe and Taos together comprise the third largest art market in the United States (3 billion per year) outdone only by New York and Los Angeles, does it really make any sense to dismiss Mr. Rane when within that Art Colony is not simply noted but perhaps most noted. Even the RC Gorman, more recognized beyond Taos, credited Mr. Rane as he favorite living Taos artist during his life. It is not possible to delete Mr. Rane from the history of the Taos Art Colony. You need to remove your article on the Taos Art Colony if you believe that Mr. Rane is not notable. Obviously, Wikipedia is concerned with general knowledge but you cannot deny the importance of Mr. Rane and his work to the Taos Art Colony. Mr. Rane is likely the most notable artist to come out of that community in a long time. Since his death, the Taos Art Colony has, if anything, redoubled its appreciation for this artist and his reputation since his death has not diminished there but is, rather, growing rapidly. Mr. Rane's deletion from Wikipedia will not diminish his significance in the American Art World nor will it harm Mr. Rane's reputation as an important artist who may one day be regarded as an extremely imporant American artist in the last half of the twentieth century working in one of America's premier art communities. However, his deletion will diminish Wikipedia because it will demonstrate the lack of knowledge of, and understanding within, the American Art World. You need to carefully review your decision on this one. You need to find someone whose knowledge of the Taos Art Colony you respect in order to clear this up. You cannot delete this article without exposing a lack of knowledge for the Taos Art Colony and its importance to American Culture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.35.122.142 ( talk • contribs)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Young Hot Rod – Deletion endorsed – 00:24, 28 December 2006 (UTC) |
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Young Hot Rod is certainly a notable artist. You say being signed to G-Unit Records is not notable? You say having your single played on BET, MusicChoice, and Journey's Fashion Stores (which does not play very much hip-hop) is not notable? You say being on the cover of XXL's first ever DVD mag is not notable? I say it is. There are several rappers that are less notable such as VL Mike, Glasses Malone, Spider Loc, and so on that you do have articles on. Having every G-Unit artist up except Hot Rod makes him stick out like a sore thumb. Preferrably restore, but if you cannot do that, then at least Unprotect so that someone with more "notable" info can recreate the page. Thank you. Tom Danson 06:35, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
ZGMF-X42S Destiny Gundam – Deletion endorsed – 00:26, 28 December 2006 (UTC) |
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
The article was deleted despite a lack of clear consensus to do so in the AfD, by an admin who admits to lack of familiarity with the subject matter. The article in question is of the title mecha of Gundam SEED Destiny, piloted by that series' main character. If any mecha from the series are notable enough to merit an individual article (and the results of the mass AfD indicate that some are), this one is. Redxiv 02:58, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Phajje ke Paye – Deletion endorsed – 20:47, 22 December 2006 (UTC) |
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Possibly notable, but difficult to ascertain due to multiple possible translations of the name into the English alphabet. Apparently another remade it without going through the proper channels, but I still think it might be notable enough to actually be included on Wikipedia, it's just that it's difficult to find sources due to translation issues. The user in question provided the following links, though [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] and a small mention in a local(for Lahore, anyway) magazine, [8] Vercalos 05:02, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |