From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

9 May 2014

Suspected copyright violations (bot reports)

SCV for 2014-05-09 Edit Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations/2014-05-09

Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • If I'm understanding your question correctly, I wouldn't call it plagiarism; it's just mis-cited text. As you pointed out, we should cite the source were it was read, using "as cited in" or "as quoted in", etc. Plagiarism is copying text without proper attribution or close paraphrasing. -- Spike Wilbury ( talk) 10:27, 10 May 2014 (UTC) reply
Spike Wilbury - take a look at Talk:Jews and Communism#A major source for this article is unquestionably the piece published by the Institute for Historical Review which has a comparison table. Dougweller ( talk) 20:47, 13 May 2014 (UTC) reply
I misunderstood TFD's question. It is unquestionably plagiarism and a copyright violation. I'm going to see how far back the copyvio goes and what action might be appropriate. -- Spike Wilbury ( talk) 18:13, 14 May 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Update: Since the article contains substantive plagiarism/copyright violation going all the way back to its creation, I've blanked the page while the AfD is in process. Further action will be taken depending on the outcome of the AfD. -- Spike Wilbury ( talk) 18:21, 14 May 2014 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

9 May 2014

Suspected copyright violations (bot reports)

SCV for 2014-05-09 Edit Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations/2014-05-09

Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • If I'm understanding your question correctly, I wouldn't call it plagiarism; it's just mis-cited text. As you pointed out, we should cite the source were it was read, using "as cited in" or "as quoted in", etc. Plagiarism is copying text without proper attribution or close paraphrasing. -- Spike Wilbury ( talk) 10:27, 10 May 2014 (UTC) reply
Spike Wilbury - take a look at Talk:Jews and Communism#A major source for this article is unquestionably the piece published by the Institute for Historical Review which has a comparison table. Dougweller ( talk) 20:47, 13 May 2014 (UTC) reply
I misunderstood TFD's question. It is unquestionably plagiarism and a copyright violation. I'm going to see how far back the copyvio goes and what action might be appropriate. -- Spike Wilbury ( talk) 18:13, 14 May 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Update: Since the article contains substantive plagiarism/copyright violation going all the way back to its creation, I've blanked the page while the AfD is in process. Further action will be taken depending on the outcome of the AfD. -- Spike Wilbury ( talk) 18:21, 14 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook