Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Text was available under an incompatible license, copied text removed.
Monty845 15:57, 12 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Original article deleted. This one seems okay. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 19:25, 20 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. version with the vio deleted G7, recreated article does not appear to be a vio.
Monty845 16:02, 12 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Tagged version deleted A7, current version does not appear to be a vio.
Monty845 16:04, 12 May 2012 (UTC)reply
No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Comprehensive, non-creative list. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 19:22, 20 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Backwardscopy. Tag and explanation placed at talk page. I have not put the backwards tag on, though, because the content has been removed from the external site. Comparing it with the earliest edit of the article shows substantial content in our article that was not in the cached version of the website. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 14:02, 20 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Source has disappeared; I haven't tagged the talk page or the article since I can't access archives and the tag has already been removed by original tagger. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 15:18, 20 May 2012 (UTC)reply
No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. According to the original tagger, who recanted. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 15:29, 20 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Text was available under an incompatible license, copied text removed.
Monty845 15:57, 12 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Original article deleted. This one seems okay. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 19:25, 20 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. version with the vio deleted G7, recreated article does not appear to be a vio.
Monty845 16:02, 12 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Tagged version deleted A7, current version does not appear to be a vio.
Monty845 16:04, 12 May 2012 (UTC)reply
No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Comprehensive, non-creative list. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 19:22, 20 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Backwardscopy. Tag and explanation placed at talk page. I have not put the backwards tag on, though, because the content has been removed from the external site. Comparing it with the earliest edit of the article shows substantial content in our article that was not in the cached version of the website. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 14:02, 20 May 2012 (UTC)reply
Source has disappeared; I haven't tagged the talk page or the article since I can't access archives and the tag has already been removed by original tagger. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 15:18, 20 May 2012 (UTC)reply
No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. According to the original tagger, who recanted. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 15:29, 20 May 2012 (UTC)reply