No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. In short the answer is no, there's no concern here. Facts and ideas are not copyrightable (see
Copyright law of the United States#Idea/expression dichotomy and
User:Moonriddengirl/Copyright in lists for more on this), although the way they're expressed often is. In this instant these lists bear very little resemblance to the source - there's different information in the list, different people included, we have our own criteria for inclusion for those lists that are subjective etc so there's no concern there either. --
Dpmuk (
talk) 19:53, 29 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Removed for now. It can be restored when permission goes through. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 01:37, 5 March 2012 (UTC)reply
No vio found, claim cannot be validated. Tag removed from article. natural evolution of the text. One single edit from August 2006 could possibly be at issue, but without a source, no conclusions can be drawn. --
MLauba(Talk) 09:48, 1 March 2012 (UTC)reply
No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. In short the answer is no, there's no concern here. Facts and ideas are not copyrightable (see
Copyright law of the United States#Idea/expression dichotomy and
User:Moonriddengirl/Copyright in lists for more on this), although the way they're expressed often is. In this instant these lists bear very little resemblance to the source - there's different information in the list, different people included, we have our own criteria for inclusion for those lists that are subjective etc so there's no concern there either. --
Dpmuk (
talk) 19:53, 29 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Removed for now. It can be restored when permission goes through. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 01:37, 5 March 2012 (UTC)reply
No vio found, claim cannot be validated. Tag removed from article. natural evolution of the text. One single edit from August 2006 could possibly be at issue, but without a source, no conclusions can be drawn. --
MLauba(Talk) 09:48, 1 March 2012 (UTC)reply