No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Text was split from the subject's biography. Attribution now in article history.
NortyNort(Holla) 02:48, 3 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Some matches in the [
DD] but I think it is hard to avoid this type of short bio and paraphrasing in the article.--
NortyNort(Holla) 11:28, 10 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Y Addressed through redirection. I'm inclined to agree that protection is thin in such content, but it is worth considering that our article began as a direct paste of that material. I had planned to address this as I frequently will by finding more information about the gentleman to include, but I simply cannot find anything. There are a few scant mentions in the archives of google news, but otherwise nothing. I've redirected it, since his independent notability is in question. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 14:30, 10 May 2011 (UTC)reply
One of the major contributors appears to be the author himself and the text copied from the subject's bio
here. I restored an old version
here. The website itself is copyrighted and if anything, the text wasn't neutral.--
NortyNort(Holla) 11:44, 10 May 2011 (UTC)reply
One user has been cleaning this up since March and removed the tag. I removed one more instance. The copyrighted text was added in a period of at least a year and this article has had a lot of copyright problems
in the past as well. Not sure if a rev del is applicable in this case.--
NortyNort(Holla) 12:06, 10 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Perhaps not, unless it comes back. Very likely, copyright problems will continue with this article, as certain areas are prone to them. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 14:32, 10 May 2011 (UTC)reply
No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Text was split from the subject's biography. Attribution now in article history.
NortyNort(Holla) 02:48, 3 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Some matches in the [
DD] but I think it is hard to avoid this type of short bio and paraphrasing in the article.--
NortyNort(Holla) 11:28, 10 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Y Addressed through redirection. I'm inclined to agree that protection is thin in such content, but it is worth considering that our article began as a direct paste of that material. I had planned to address this as I frequently will by finding more information about the gentleman to include, but I simply cannot find anything. There are a few scant mentions in the archives of google news, but otherwise nothing. I've redirected it, since his independent notability is in question. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 14:30, 10 May 2011 (UTC)reply
One of the major contributors appears to be the author himself and the text copied from the subject's bio
here. I restored an old version
here. The website itself is copyrighted and if anything, the text wasn't neutral.--
NortyNort(Holla) 11:44, 10 May 2011 (UTC)reply
One user has been cleaning this up since March and removed the tag. I removed one more instance. The copyrighted text was added in a period of at least a year and this article has had a lot of copyright problems
in the past as well. Not sure if a rev del is applicable in this case.--
NortyNort(Holla) 12:06, 10 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Perhaps not, unless it comes back. Very likely, copyright problems will continue with this article, as certain areas are prone to them. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 14:32, 10 May 2011 (UTC)reply