Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

18 May 2011

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2011-05-18 Edit

2011-05-18 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. Article partially cleaned by creator and then cut/paste moved to Imar Film Company. NortyNort (Holla) 03:47, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Mirror site. sonia♫ 01:20, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Actually, this is not a false positive, but a properly attributed split. :) A false positive occurs when there is no text match. In this case, the bot was right, but it cannot tell that attribution was provided. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:16, 29 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. NortyNort (Holla) 10:08, 18 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. sonia♫ 01:22, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. False positive. — James ( Talk • Contribs) • 1:57pm • 03:57, 21 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. False positive. sonia♫ 03:51, 21 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. NortyNort (Holla) 05:18, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article redirected to non-infringing article. sonia♫ 01:20, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Nothing found on this one. I Google'd some Google-translated Russian versions of text as well.-- NortyNort (Holla) 09:05, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Green tickY I didn't find anything either but have reduced it a bit to diminish the risk. We will always face the problem in these cases of uncertainty. :/ -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:06, 29 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Nothing in searches. I did some searches and comparisons in Russian as well.-- NortyNort (Holla) 09:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Green tickY Stubbed. In this case, there is not only the inherent uncertainty but the English seemed sophisticated based on his conversational levels. Hard to tell. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:11, 29 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Text already removed as essay-like. I couldn't confirm it was previously a copyvio and the school's website isn't indexed in searches. The text appeared copy and pasted.-- NortyNort (Holla) 08:39, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Cleaned this one up a little bit; a few matches and similarities within sentences.-- NortyNort (Holla) 08:17, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No source found; copy-paste tag removed and cv-unsure tag placed at article talk. This is for all Apprentice entries above. The tag-placer hasn't responded to my query and this has relisted enough. -- NortyNort (Holla) 09:17, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
    • Sorry but I disagree. "This has relisted enough" is never reason to remove a tag. This was originally tagged two years ago and is only showing here because the article was split and the tag added to each new page. There was a reason this was the last page in the old copypaste backlog - it's very complicated to check. As far as I can see NortyNort has not used the waybackmachine or similar to check old versions of possible source pages and as such I'm not sure these should have been removed. More here where I raise the removal and NortyNort asks me to reply here. Their actions may be normal practice but this isn't a normal situation due to the age of the listing. Dpmuk ( talk) 09:53, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
      • I left a more detailed comment on Talk:List_of_The_Apprentice_candidates_(UK)_series_one as Dpmuk cited. My re-listing comment was more representative of the lack of an identified source and belief that specific tag may have been handled after my investigation among other indicators. It wasn't purely because it was re-listed enough. With that, I don't think there is a reason to continually list it here when a possible problem is being examined by an editor in the background. I think cv-unsure suffices in this case.-- NortyNort (Holla) 13:07, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2011_May_18&oldid=431529864"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

18 May 2011

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2011-05-18 Edit

2011-05-18 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. Article partially cleaned by creator and then cut/paste moved to Imar Film Company. NortyNort (Holla) 03:47, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Mirror site. sonia♫ 01:20, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Actually, this is not a false positive, but a properly attributed split. :) A false positive occurs when there is no text match. In this case, the bot was right, but it cannot tell that attribution was provided. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:16, 29 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. NortyNort (Holla) 10:08, 18 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. sonia♫ 01:22, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. False positive. — James ( Talk • Contribs) • 1:57pm • 03:57, 21 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. False positive. sonia♫ 03:51, 21 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. NortyNort (Holla) 05:18, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article redirected to non-infringing article. sonia♫ 01:20, 19 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Nothing found on this one. I Google'd some Google-translated Russian versions of text as well.-- NortyNort (Holla) 09:05, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Green tickY I didn't find anything either but have reduced it a bit to diminish the risk. We will always face the problem in these cases of uncertainty. :/ -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:06, 29 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Nothing in searches. I did some searches and comparisons in Russian as well.-- NortyNort (Holla) 09:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Green tickY Stubbed. In this case, there is not only the inherent uncertainty but the English seemed sophisticated based on his conversational levels. Hard to tell. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:11, 29 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Text already removed as essay-like. I couldn't confirm it was previously a copyvio and the school's website isn't indexed in searches. The text appeared copy and pasted.-- NortyNort (Holla) 08:39, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Cleaned this one up a little bit; a few matches and similarities within sentences.-- NortyNort (Holla) 08:17, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No source found; copy-paste tag removed and cv-unsure tag placed at article talk. This is for all Apprentice entries above. The tag-placer hasn't responded to my query and this has relisted enough. -- NortyNort (Holla) 09:17, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
    • Sorry but I disagree. "This has relisted enough" is never reason to remove a tag. This was originally tagged two years ago and is only showing here because the article was split and the tag added to each new page. There was a reason this was the last page in the old copypaste backlog - it's very complicated to check. As far as I can see NortyNort has not used the waybackmachine or similar to check old versions of possible source pages and as such I'm not sure these should have been removed. More here where I raise the removal and NortyNort asks me to reply here. Their actions may be normal practice but this isn't a normal situation due to the age of the listing. Dpmuk ( talk) 09:53, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
      • I left a more detailed comment on Talk:List_of_The_Apprentice_candidates_(UK)_series_one as Dpmuk cited. My re-listing comment was more representative of the lack of an identified source and belief that specific tag may have been handled after my investigation among other indicators. It wasn't purely because it was re-listed enough. With that, I don't think there is a reason to continually list it here when a possible problem is being examined by an editor in the background. I think cv-unsure suffices in this case.-- NortyNort (Holla) 13:07, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2011_May_18&oldid=431529864"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE