Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

20 June 2011

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2011-06-20 Edit

2011-06-20 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • OTRS Ticket received, article now licensed and compatible with CC-BY-SA. -- January ( talk) 17:52, 21 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- January ( talk) 17:56, 21 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. NortyNort (Holla) 14:08, 25 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Purged. Copyright problem removed from history. -- January ( talk) 17:24, 2 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. Just some quotes left. NortyNort (Holla) 14:12, 25 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. Most cleaned by author. NortyNort (Holla) 14:20, 25 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Purged. Copyright problem removed from history. -- January ( talk) 17:24, 2 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. NortyNort (Holla) 14:27, 25 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Purged. Copyright problem removed from history. -- January ( talk) 17:24, 2 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Would it be terrible of me to place all of the text from this 10 chapter source into a temporary userspace article? It would help in the comparison and clean-up. This is one doozie of a foundational copyvio and will take some work.-- NortyNort (Holla) 14:23, 29 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • We kind of can't do that. :/ But the good news is that the Duplication detector is supposed to permit us to upload documents. Under the circumstances, I don't think there'd be any issue at all with pasting it into a word processor document and uploading that to the Dupdet. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:08, 30 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. This one was blanked for more than 10 days. It is not our responsibility to rewrite content if the community of interested editors does not care to do so. No rewrite or clean version were proposed, so I have reverted it back to the last presumed clean. I selectively deleted the subsequent history, as the copyvio was too extensive to revdelete, even if I had all the time and patience in the world. :/ -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:18, 3 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Yes, this would have been some rewrite. I agree with your actions.-- NortyNort (Holla) 03:59, 4 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • User was not notified, relisting under today's entry. I won't relist until this day is closed if such an action is considered useless since an IP inserted the text over a year ago. Removal won't be too hard. -- NortyNort (Holla) 12:22, 28 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. With IPs, I don't sweat the notification, when they're probably long gone. :) -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:46, 3 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. Stub'd -- NortyNort (Holla) 12:32, 28 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article redirected to a non-infringing target. (Deleted then redirected following an AFD.) -- January ( talk) 16:23, 27 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • OTRS Ticket received, article now licensed and compatible with CC-BY-SA. -- January ( talk) 16:23, 27 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. Old version restored, text added 20 October 2006 -- NortyNort (Holla) 12:45, 28 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Purged. Copyright problem removed from history. -- January ( talk) 19:27, 28 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2011_June_20&oldid=1047148929"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

20 June 2011

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2011-06-20 Edit

2011-06-20 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • OTRS Ticket received, article now licensed and compatible with CC-BY-SA. -- January ( talk) 17:52, 21 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- January ( talk) 17:56, 21 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. NortyNort (Holla) 14:08, 25 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Purged. Copyright problem removed from history. -- January ( talk) 17:24, 2 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. Just some quotes left. NortyNort (Holla) 14:12, 25 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. Most cleaned by author. NortyNort (Holla) 14:20, 25 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Purged. Copyright problem removed from history. -- January ( talk) 17:24, 2 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. NortyNort (Holla) 14:27, 25 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Purged. Copyright problem removed from history. -- January ( talk) 17:24, 2 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Would it be terrible of me to place all of the text from this 10 chapter source into a temporary userspace article? It would help in the comparison and clean-up. This is one doozie of a foundational copyvio and will take some work.-- NortyNort (Holla) 14:23, 29 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • We kind of can't do that. :/ But the good news is that the Duplication detector is supposed to permit us to upload documents. Under the circumstances, I don't think there'd be any issue at all with pasting it into a word processor document and uploading that to the Dupdet. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:08, 30 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. This one was blanked for more than 10 days. It is not our responsibility to rewrite content if the community of interested editors does not care to do so. No rewrite or clean version were proposed, so I have reverted it back to the last presumed clean. I selectively deleted the subsequent history, as the copyvio was too extensive to revdelete, even if I had all the time and patience in the world. :/ -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:18, 3 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Yes, this would have been some rewrite. I agree with your actions.-- NortyNort (Holla) 03:59, 4 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • User was not notified, relisting under today's entry. I won't relist until this day is closed if such an action is considered useless since an IP inserted the text over a year ago. Removal won't be too hard. -- NortyNort (Holla) 12:22, 28 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. With IPs, I don't sweat the notification, when they're probably long gone. :) -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:46, 3 July 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. Stub'd -- NortyNort (Holla) 12:32, 28 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article redirected to a non-infringing target. (Deleted then redirected following an AFD.) -- January ( talk) 16:23, 27 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • OTRS Ticket received, article now licensed and compatible with CC-BY-SA. -- January ( talk) 16:23, 27 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. Old version restored, text added 20 October 2006 -- NortyNort (Holla) 12:45, 28 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Purged. Copyright problem removed from history. -- January ( talk) 19:27, 28 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2011_June_20&oldid=1047148929"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE