From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

10 June 2011

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2011-06-10 Edit

2011-06-10 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Permission plausible. Article blanked and contributor notified how to proceed. An administrator should delete if permission is not verified within five to seven days of the timestamp. Edit summary asserts that the article creator produced the website. Anthem 09:42, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. False positive. As far as I can tell, no infringement. "Source" link is now dead, nothing on wayback machine, no google hits for sentence fragments. Article has apparently been written using a Spanish source. Beloved Freak 20:09, 10 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Please somebody check this one, as I wrote the article so have a clear COI. However, I didn't even see the "source" while writing, and there only seems to be superfcial similarity on the duplication report. Beloved Freak 18:48, 10 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Is indeed a false positive. Hut 8.5 21:58, 10 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

10 June 2011

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2011-06-10 Edit

2011-06-10 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Permission plausible. Article blanked and contributor notified how to proceed. An administrator should delete if permission is not verified within five to seven days of the timestamp. Edit summary asserts that the article creator produced the website. Anthem 09:42, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. False positive. As far as I can tell, no infringement. "Source" link is now dead, nothing on wayback machine, no google hits for sentence fragments. Article has apparently been written using a Spanish source. Beloved Freak 20:09, 10 June 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Please somebody check this one, as I wrote the article so have a clear COI. However, I didn't even see the "source" while writing, and there only seems to be superfcial similarity on the duplication report. Beloved Freak 18:48, 10 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Is indeed a false positive. Hut 8.5 21:58, 10 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook