Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

22 September 2010

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2010-09-22 Edit

2010-09-22 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney ( talk) 22:01, 23 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 ( talk) 06:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Acather96 ( talk) 06:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 ( talk) 06:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 ( talk) 06:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article redirected to non-infringing article. Acather96 ( talk) 06:16, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Investigator unsure, second opinion requested. Acather96 ( talk) 06:16, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Redirected to existing article regardless. VernoWhitney ( talk) 23:37, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 ( talk) 06:25, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article tagged for speedy deletion. db-gdl Acather96 ( talk) 06:25, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No vio found, claim cannot be validated. Tag removed from article. -- Acather96 ( talk) 06:30, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Acather96 ( talk) 06:30, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article tagged for speedy deletion. db-gfdl Acather96 ( talk) 06:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Mirror site Acather96 ( talk) 06:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Split. Added attribution. VernoWhitney ( talk) 23:42, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 ( talk) 06:37, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:03, 30 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:02, 30 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. No usable rewrite proposed; restored to last clean. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:59, 30 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:59, 30 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • At least the first half of the article is confirmed copyvio per the preview available here. VernoWhitney ( talk) 16:15, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. I think the version I reverted to is clean? -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney ( talk) 12:25, 29 September 2010 (UTC) reply
There was one clean version of Royal Dutch Shell environmental issues supplied by User:Johnadonovan, but I could not revert to it because it would not survive:

Royal Dutch Shell is engaged in a variety of business activities across the world which of necessity involves the extraction, production, handling, processing and transportation of hazardous products, including hydrocarbons and chemicals. The scale of operation means that even with the highest safety and maintenance standards, incidents are likely to occur. The record of incidents detailed in this article should be considered in that context.

Copyright concerns entered in the very next edit. There was no way to truncate the overuse of non-free content in this article or the other without completely restructuring and rewriting, and nobody proposed such a rewrite. The ground has been cleared, and new articles can be created as appropriate without overreliance on copyrighted content. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:35, 30 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2010_September_22&oldid=387964253"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

22 September 2010

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2010-09-22 Edit

2010-09-22 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney ( talk) 22:01, 23 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 ( talk) 06:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Acather96 ( talk) 06:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 ( talk) 06:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 ( talk) 06:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article redirected to non-infringing article. Acather96 ( talk) 06:16, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Investigator unsure, second opinion requested. Acather96 ( talk) 06:16, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Redirected to existing article regardless. VernoWhitney ( talk) 23:37, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 ( talk) 06:25, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article tagged for speedy deletion. db-gdl Acather96 ( talk) 06:25, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No vio found, claim cannot be validated. Tag removed from article. -- Acather96 ( talk) 06:30, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Acather96 ( talk) 06:30, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article tagged for speedy deletion. db-gfdl Acather96 ( talk) 06:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Mirror site Acather96 ( talk) 06:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Split. Added attribution. VernoWhitney ( talk) 23:42, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 ( talk) 06:37, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:03, 30 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:02, 30 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. No usable rewrite proposed; restored to last clean. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:59, 30 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:59, 30 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • At least the first half of the article is confirmed copyvio per the preview available here. VernoWhitney ( talk) 16:15, 25 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. I think the version I reverted to is clean? -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney ( talk) 12:25, 29 September 2010 (UTC) reply
There was one clean version of Royal Dutch Shell environmental issues supplied by User:Johnadonovan, but I could not revert to it because it would not survive:

Royal Dutch Shell is engaged in a variety of business activities across the world which of necessity involves the extraction, production, handling, processing and transportation of hazardous products, including hydrocarbons and chemicals. The scale of operation means that even with the highest safety and maintenance standards, incidents are likely to occur. The record of incidents detailed in this article should be considered in that context.

Copyright concerns entered in the very next edit. There was no way to truncate the overuse of non-free content in this article or the other without completely restructuring and rewriting, and nobody proposed such a rewrite. The ground has been cleared, and new articles can be created as appropriate without overreliance on copyrighted content. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:35, 30 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2010_September_22&oldid=387964253"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE