Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

14 October 2010

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2010-10-14 Edit

2010-10-14 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney ( talk) 21:25, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney ( talk) 21:43, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. List of works. VernoWhitney ( talk) 20:21, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:32, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Close, but looks clean enough. VernoWhitney ( talk) 21:55, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney ( talk) 22:43, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney ( talk) 22:57, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. CC-BY license on source page. VernoWhitney ( talk) 23:01, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Permission plausible Article blanked and contributor notified how to proceed. An administrator should delete if permission is not verified within five to seven days of the timestamp. VernoWhitney ( talk) 23:17, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. VernoWhitney ( talk) 22:40, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Most was a non-creative list of jobs from a CV VernoWhitney ( talk) 23:36, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Permission plausible Article blanked and contributor notified how to proceed. An administrator should delete if permission is not verified within five to seven days of the timestamp. VernoWhitney ( talk) 23:48, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney ( talk) 23:51, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Attributed split. VernoWhitney ( talk) 23:53, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. History restored for attribution. VernoWhitney ( talk) 22:48, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • User:Anthonyhcole/Mania ( history · last edit) from DSM IV. Hope I'm in the right place. I want to insert a description of "manic episode" per the DSM IV into Mania, so I've paraphrased the DSM text, but I recall a frenzy of DSM deletions a while back, and don't know if there have been any special guidelines developed for using DSM info. Could someone possibly scan what I've done and tell me if I can insert it as is? Sorry for the trouble. I know how ridiculously busy you guys are. Anthony ( talk) 06:15, 14 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Francesco Attolico ( history · last edit) from see talk. Second paragraph is pretty chancy. Its not polished prose but its not choppy prose either. Also DD's sport bio articles don't often contain second paragraphs. I'm not comfortable leaving it, but I'm not comfortable pulling it either. *Kat* ( talk) 07:01, 14 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:20, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Green tickY Relisting. Let's give this one a bit more time to see how the discussion plays out on the status of the EU. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:20, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Cursory review: introduction of disputed text on Wikipedia in 2006 predates both alleged sources (but the second one is a fifth edition with the first one dating back to 2001, not directly accessible). Stylistic evidence (multiple typos when the text first appears, such as "noy", "haedware", "specifc", poor grammar, the capitalization after a comma (expanding from a simple list of terms separated by commas) seems to point to a wikipedia origin. Need another pair of eyes though. MLauba ( Talk) 09:05, 7 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Stupid source being all inaccessible. :P I need to see if I can find somebody who can review it. I'll check at resource exchange or the librarian WikiProject. I've had luck there before. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:25, 14 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Green tickY Failing any definite evidence of copyvio, I've restored this. See article's talk for more. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:25, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The only open ticket for the day; everything else, including SCV, has been reviewed
  • I think somebody else should review this, with fresh eyes, as I reviewed the last one. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:23, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Stubbified, rewrite remained unusably close. See examples. VernoWhitney ( talk) 15:32, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2010_October_14&oldid=393011522"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

14 October 2010

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2010-10-14 Edit

2010-10-14 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney ( talk) 21:25, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney ( talk) 21:43, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. List of works. VernoWhitney ( talk) 20:21, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:32, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Close, but looks clean enough. VernoWhitney ( talk) 21:55, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney ( talk) 22:43, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney ( talk) 22:57, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. CC-BY license on source page. VernoWhitney ( talk) 23:01, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Permission plausible Article blanked and contributor notified how to proceed. An administrator should delete if permission is not verified within five to seven days of the timestamp. VernoWhitney ( talk) 23:17, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. VernoWhitney ( talk) 22:40, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Most was a non-creative list of jobs from a CV VernoWhitney ( talk) 23:36, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Permission plausible Article blanked and contributor notified how to proceed. An administrator should delete if permission is not verified within five to seven days of the timestamp. VernoWhitney ( talk) 23:48, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney ( talk) 23:51, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Attributed split. VernoWhitney ( talk) 23:53, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. History restored for attribution. VernoWhitney ( talk) 22:48, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • User:Anthonyhcole/Mania ( history · last edit) from DSM IV. Hope I'm in the right place. I want to insert a description of "manic episode" per the DSM IV into Mania, so I've paraphrased the DSM text, but I recall a frenzy of DSM deletions a while back, and don't know if there have been any special guidelines developed for using DSM info. Could someone possibly scan what I've done and tell me if I can insert it as is? Sorry for the trouble. I know how ridiculously busy you guys are. Anthony ( talk) 06:15, 14 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Francesco Attolico ( history · last edit) from see talk. Second paragraph is pretty chancy. Its not polished prose but its not choppy prose either. Also DD's sport bio articles don't often contain second paragraphs. I'm not comfortable leaving it, but I'm not comfortable pulling it either. *Kat* ( talk) 07:01, 14 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:20, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Green tickY Relisting. Let's give this one a bit more time to see how the discussion plays out on the status of the EU. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:20, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Cursory review: introduction of disputed text on Wikipedia in 2006 predates both alleged sources (but the second one is a fifth edition with the first one dating back to 2001, not directly accessible). Stylistic evidence (multiple typos when the text first appears, such as "noy", "haedware", "specifc", poor grammar, the capitalization after a comma (expanding from a simple list of terms separated by commas) seems to point to a wikipedia origin. Need another pair of eyes though. MLauba ( Talk) 09:05, 7 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Stupid source being all inaccessible. :P I need to see if I can find somebody who can review it. I'll check at resource exchange or the librarian WikiProject. I've had luck there before. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:25, 14 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Green tickY Failing any definite evidence of copyvio, I've restored this. See article's talk for more. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:25, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The only open ticket for the day; everything else, including SCV, has been reviewed
  • I think somebody else should review this, with fresh eyes, as I reviewed the last one. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:23, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Stubbified, rewrite remained unusably close. See examples. VernoWhitney ( talk) 15:32, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2010_October_14&oldid=393011522"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE