Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. This was foundational; the website was cited, so that proves it predates. Later it was compounded with additional pasting. --
Moonriddengirl(talk)16:49, 19 November 2010 (UTC)reply
Jenny Morris (musician). I'm reporting concerns of copy violation raised by
User:124.176.58.238 on my
talkpage and later on
Talk:Jenny Morris (musician). As indicated on those pages, I don't fully understand the nature of the complaint nor can I tell where in the article any problems remain. I have provided sources for some information that User:124.176.58.238 deleted but can't see how they relate to a copy violation. Could anyone please have a look at the article, its history and determine whether there are any actual copy violations which should be deleted?
shaidar cuebiyar (
talk)
09:45, 11 November 2010 (UTC)reply
No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. This seems to have been based on a misunderstanding of copyright law and what is protected by it. So far as I have been able to determine, what is under dispute is the basic biographical facts used in the article and not any creative expression. In addition to a note at the talk page, I've left one for the IP and watchlisted both pages in case further clarification is necessary. --
Moonriddengirl(talk)14:13, 18 November 2010 (UTC)reply
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. While the earlier content was a clear vio, the rewrite was a bit more borderline. Still, it very closely followed in structure and retained some striking language. I have removed it again; there is an offer at the talk page to rewrite, which hopefully will result in usable text! Meanwhile, I've tagged the impages NPD and written his representative to verify. --
Moonriddengirl(talk)15:02, 20 November 2010 (UTC)reply
? I don't find any sign of copied content in a quick snippet check or a mechanical check. No source was given by the tagger. The sources for this content are inaccessible, but there's no compelling reason to believe this is a copyvio that I can see. --
Moonriddengirl(talk)15:18, 20 November 2010 (UTC)reply
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. This was foundational; the website was cited, so that proves it predates. Later it was compounded with additional pasting. --
Moonriddengirl(talk)16:49, 19 November 2010 (UTC)reply
Jenny Morris (musician). I'm reporting concerns of copy violation raised by
User:124.176.58.238 on my
talkpage and later on
Talk:Jenny Morris (musician). As indicated on those pages, I don't fully understand the nature of the complaint nor can I tell where in the article any problems remain. I have provided sources for some information that User:124.176.58.238 deleted but can't see how they relate to a copy violation. Could anyone please have a look at the article, its history and determine whether there are any actual copy violations which should be deleted?
shaidar cuebiyar (
talk)
09:45, 11 November 2010 (UTC)reply
No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. This seems to have been based on a misunderstanding of copyright law and what is protected by it. So far as I have been able to determine, what is under dispute is the basic biographical facts used in the article and not any creative expression. In addition to a note at the talk page, I've left one for the IP and watchlisted both pages in case further clarification is necessary. --
Moonriddengirl(talk)14:13, 18 November 2010 (UTC)reply
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. While the earlier content was a clear vio, the rewrite was a bit more borderline. Still, it very closely followed in structure and retained some striking language. I have removed it again; there is an offer at the talk page to rewrite, which hopefully will result in usable text! Meanwhile, I've tagged the impages NPD and written his representative to verify. --
Moonriddengirl(talk)15:02, 20 November 2010 (UTC)reply
? I don't find any sign of copied content in a quick snippet check or a mechanical check. No source was given by the tagger. The sources for this content are inaccessible, but there's no compelling reason to believe this is a copyvio that I can see. --
Moonriddengirl(talk)15:18, 20 November 2010 (UTC)reply