Y Already cleaned, and rightly so. We don't have a "manifesto" exclusion on Wikipedia as Wikisource does used to do; I see that they no longer do either (
archived conversation). --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 15:58, 6 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Permission plausible Article blanked and contributor notified how to proceed. An administrator should delete if permission is not verified within five to seven days of the timestamp.
Moonriddengirl(talk) 15:32, 6 March 2010 (UTC)reply
The source site is password-protected; the password is provided in the linked OTRS ticket, message 5.
Stifle (
talk) 11:43, 27 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Deleted as foundational, but this one is very strange. Based on username and other activities, I would have sworn this was the copyright holder himself. However, we never received verification, so the content would not be usable anyway, and the complaint raises the possibility of imposture. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 14:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Y Thanks very much! You're absolutely correct about the problem. The article is now blanked and has been relisted to give contributors an opportunity to respond. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 12:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Y Already cleaned, and rightly so. We don't have a "manifesto" exclusion on Wikipedia as Wikisource does used to do; I see that they no longer do either (
archived conversation). --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 15:58, 6 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Permission plausible Article blanked and contributor notified how to proceed. An administrator should delete if permission is not verified within five to seven days of the timestamp.
Moonriddengirl(talk) 15:32, 6 March 2010 (UTC)reply
The source site is password-protected; the password is provided in the linked OTRS ticket, message 5.
Stifle (
talk) 11:43, 27 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Deleted as foundational, but this one is very strange. Based on username and other activities, I would have sworn this was the copyright holder himself. However, we never received verification, so the content would not be usable anyway, and the complaint raises the possibility of imposture. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 14:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Y Thanks very much! You're absolutely correct about the problem. The article is now blanked and has been relisted to give contributors an opportunity to respond. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 12:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)reply