Yup, this looks hopeless. And the temp page is just a clone of the tainted original article. Editors claim to be improving it, but they're not resolving the copyvio problem but rather engaging in process disruption.
DMacks (
talk) 07:10, 3 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Both of the proposed temporary versions contain text from the original article without attribution, which makes both of them unusable. I'll write a clean stub, but this one is going to require watching. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 12:06, 11 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Y New article in place. Keep fingers crossed. :) --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 14:30, 11 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Yup, this looks hopeless. And the temp page is just a clone of the tainted original article. Editors claim to be improving it, but they're not resolving the copyvio problem but rather engaging in process disruption.
DMacks (
talk) 07:10, 3 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Both of the proposed temporary versions contain text from the original article without attribution, which makes both of them unusable. I'll write a clean stub, but this one is going to require watching. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 12:06, 11 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Y New article in place. Keep fingers crossed. :) --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 14:30, 11 September 2009 (UTC)reply