Eugenio Torre(
history ·
last edit) from
[1]. Most of the "Wins the 2002 Philippine National Championship" section comes from that souce and the entire next section sounds like it was copied from a news release (probably the dead link at the end).
Bubba73(talk), 03:38, 2 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Text entered the article in
August 2006. Other text contributed at that time should also be evaluated and possibly presumptively removed. I am blanking and relisting, since the contributor (who is still active) was not notified. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 13:02, 10 September 2009 (UTC)reply
As no one undertook a rewrite of this and copyvio was foundational, it has been deleted to allow creation of clean. The only material that remained after the copyvio was a single "paragraph" of current statistics. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 12:56, 10 September 2009 (UTC)reply
User responded to my message today (September 7)
here. Theleftorium 14:18, 7 September 2009 (UTC)reply
According to
Talk:Lydia Canaan, there is a license release on the myspace page. I can't verify it (work internet restrictions) but if it's there, then there shouldn't be any further problems. OTRS ticket#2009090210044836 also refers.
Stifle (
talk) 11:45, 10 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Y Released at source, but tagged for cleanup & neutrality. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 12:49, 10 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Looks like a reverse infringement. Investigating further. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 12:11, 10 September 2009 (UTC)reply
I am undecided. The article was created as a split from another article in April 2006 with elements that are present in the external link, but tremendous differences. The following year,
the article was revised to bring it closer to that external source. The article was changed subsequently by other editors, but it is this version that appears in that external source. Complicating matters further, wayback does not record an archival version for the English translation of the official site, but does for the original Italian. I see two possibilities: either our article was copied (it certainly sounds promotional: "When the weather is right, the wines can be some of the greatest in France."), or the official site, when it decided to add English, snagged our article. Making the latter less likely, they would have had to have done so in 2007. Think I'll blank and relist, since the contributor was not invited to comment. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 12:27, 10 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Eugenio Torre(
history ·
last edit) from
[1]. Most of the "Wins the 2002 Philippine National Championship" section comes from that souce and the entire next section sounds like it was copied from a news release (probably the dead link at the end).
Bubba73(talk), 03:38, 2 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Text entered the article in
August 2006. Other text contributed at that time should also be evaluated and possibly presumptively removed. I am blanking and relisting, since the contributor (who is still active) was not notified. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 13:02, 10 September 2009 (UTC)reply
As no one undertook a rewrite of this and copyvio was foundational, it has been deleted to allow creation of clean. The only material that remained after the copyvio was a single "paragraph" of current statistics. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 12:56, 10 September 2009 (UTC)reply
User responded to my message today (September 7)
here. Theleftorium 14:18, 7 September 2009 (UTC)reply
According to
Talk:Lydia Canaan, there is a license release on the myspace page. I can't verify it (work internet restrictions) but if it's there, then there shouldn't be any further problems. OTRS ticket#2009090210044836 also refers.
Stifle (
talk) 11:45, 10 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Y Released at source, but tagged for cleanup & neutrality. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 12:49, 10 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Looks like a reverse infringement. Investigating further. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 12:11, 10 September 2009 (UTC)reply
I am undecided. The article was created as a split from another article in April 2006 with elements that are present in the external link, but tremendous differences. The following year,
the article was revised to bring it closer to that external source. The article was changed subsequently by other editors, but it is this version that appears in that external source. Complicating matters further, wayback does not record an archival version for the English translation of the official site, but does for the original Italian. I see two possibilities: either our article was copied (it certainly sounds promotional: "When the weather is right, the wines can be some of the greatest in France."), or the official site, when it decided to add English, snagged our article. Making the latter less likely, they would have had to have done so in 2007. Think I'll blank and relist, since the contributor was not invited to comment. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 12:27, 10 September 2009 (UTC)reply