Article blanked for evaluation and closure through
WP:CP. Article created under the mistaken impression that press releases could be freely used on WP.
Moonriddengirl(talk) 15:01, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Repeat infringer strongly cautioned. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 15:14, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Fairly lengthy quote, but I think it's defensible under
WP:NFCMoonriddengirl(talk) 15:27, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Repeat infringer blocked. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 14:41, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Copyright problem was foundational, by a creator who has pasted content into multiple articles. While there may have been some material in the article that was not copied, the entirety of the article constituted a
derivative work, and there was no way to verify what material may have been clean. Since no contributor cared to address the issue, the article has been deleted to permit creation from fresh. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 14:10, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Copyright problem was foundational, by a creator who has pasted content into multiple articles. While there may have been some material in the article that was not copied, the entirety of the article constituted a
derivative work, and there was no way to verify what material may have been clean. Since no contributor cared to address the issue, the article has been deleted to permit creation from fresh. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 14:09, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Copyright problem was foundational, by a creator who has pasted content into multiple articles. While there may have been some material in the article that was not copied, the entirety of the article constituted a
derivative work, and there was no way to verify what material may have been clean. Since no contributor cared to address the issue, the article has been deleted to permit creation from fresh. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 14:08, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Copyright problem was foundational, by a creator who has pasted content into multiple articles. While there may have been some material in the article that was not copied, the entirety of the article constituted a
derivative work, and there was no way to verify what material may have been clean. Since no contributor cared to address the issue, the article has been deleted to permit creation from fresh. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 13:40, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Copyright problem was foundational, by a creator who has pasted content into multiple articles. While there may have been some material in the article that was not copied, the entirety of the article constituted a
derivative work, and there was no way to verify what material may have been clean. Since no contributor cared to address the issue, the article has been deleted to permit creation fresh. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 13:38, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Article blanked for evaluation and closure through
WP:CP. Article created under the mistaken impression that press releases could be freely used on WP.
Moonriddengirl(talk) 15:01, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Repeat infringer strongly cautioned. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 15:14, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Fairly lengthy quote, but I think it's defensible under
WP:NFCMoonriddengirl(talk) 15:27, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Repeat infringer blocked. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 14:41, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Copyright problem was foundational, by a creator who has pasted content into multiple articles. While there may have been some material in the article that was not copied, the entirety of the article constituted a
derivative work, and there was no way to verify what material may have been clean. Since no contributor cared to address the issue, the article has been deleted to permit creation from fresh. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 14:10, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Copyright problem was foundational, by a creator who has pasted content into multiple articles. While there may have been some material in the article that was not copied, the entirety of the article constituted a
derivative work, and there was no way to verify what material may have been clean. Since no contributor cared to address the issue, the article has been deleted to permit creation from fresh. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 14:09, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Copyright problem was foundational, by a creator who has pasted content into multiple articles. While there may have been some material in the article that was not copied, the entirety of the article constituted a
derivative work, and there was no way to verify what material may have been clean. Since no contributor cared to address the issue, the article has been deleted to permit creation from fresh. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 14:08, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Copyright problem was foundational, by a creator who has pasted content into multiple articles. While there may have been some material in the article that was not copied, the entirety of the article constituted a
derivative work, and there was no way to verify what material may have been clean. Since no contributor cared to address the issue, the article has been deleted to permit creation from fresh. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 13:40, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Copyright problem was foundational, by a creator who has pasted content into multiple articles. While there may have been some material in the article that was not copied, the entirety of the article constituted a
derivative work, and there was no way to verify what material may have been clean. Since no contributor cared to address the issue, the article has been deleted to permit creation fresh. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 13:38, 11 December 2009 (UTC)reply