This is a bad-faith nomination based on me RFD tagging a couple of his images. This editor applies a different set of rules to images that he uploaded compared to ones he didn't upload. He's added literally hundreds of RFU tags to images in Wikipedia, but when I RFUed a few of his images and also asked for detailed fair use rationales and sources he began trolling me, adding various warning and report templates to around 6 of my uploaded images within a 20 minute period and spamming my talk page.TheQuandry 15:13, 18 November 2006 (UTC)reply
While a logo might be used under fair use, the photography -- taking a photo is also a creative action and thus copyright protected -- can not necessarily be used as fair use./
Fred-
Chess 23:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Please delete the image.
TheQuandry 05:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Image:3d vitamin c.png (
history ·
last edit) from
[5]. I have a weak grasp of copyright law and Wikipedia policy -- my apologies if this is a false alarm. I stumbled across this image page; the information there seemed to conlict with those on the source's page. --
A. B. 20:48, 18 November 2006 (UTC)reply
This is a bad-faith nomination based on me RFD tagging a couple of his images. This editor applies a different set of rules to images that he uploaded compared to ones he didn't upload. He's added literally hundreds of RFU tags to images in Wikipedia, but when I RFUed a few of his images and also asked for detailed fair use rationales and sources he began trolling me, adding various warning and report templates to around 6 of my uploaded images within a 20 minute period and spamming my talk page.TheQuandry 15:13, 18 November 2006 (UTC)reply
While a logo might be used under fair use, the photography -- taking a photo is also a creative action and thus copyright protected -- can not necessarily be used as fair use./
Fred-
Chess 23:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Please delete the image.
TheQuandry 05:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Image:3d vitamin c.png (
history ·
last edit) from
[5]. I have a weak grasp of copyright law and Wikipedia policy -- my apologies if this is a false alarm. I stumbled across this image page; the information there seemed to conlict with those on the source's page. --
A. B. 20:48, 18 November 2006 (UTC)reply