This page contains nomiations from the main
Collaboration of the week page which have been removed due to lack of votes or because they're unsuitable nominations from
July 1 to
July 16,
2004.
Important musical topic that applies to almost all styles of music (
monophonic music being an exception) including
popular and
classical. (16th on google search)
Indeed. Very important topic.
Isomorphic 03:49, 13 May 2004 (UTC)reply
Reasons for removal:
Lack of votes and has been up for a while. Removed by
User:Raul654– PlatinumX 07:18, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)
[[User:OldakQuill|
OldakQuill]] 10:21, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Comments
This is an exciting and fruitful topic. It is a theory of cognition that aims to explain how humans are creative and in general how meaning is generated. I've added close to 50 links in the
Talk:Conceptual_blending/Resources section. These links taken together provide enough of a definitive base to write an accurate and comprehensive encyclopedic article. --
Gyan 22:16, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)-
I'm calling for volunteers to help me with this article. I've setup a
Draft space, for article discussion. I shall put up an outline soon to get things started. --
Gyan 22:16, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)-
Reasons for removal:
Lack of votes and has been up for a while. Removed by
User:Raul654– PlatinumX 07:18, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Taxobox-only stub I created when making all of the family pages for
Wikipedia:WikiProject Cephalopods. Would be a good article to get folks interested in the WikiProject, andwho can resist such an interestingly named creature! -
UtherSRG
Google returns a very scant amount of information - this will be hard to research. On the flip side, this means that wikipedia could be the source for info on this rather interesting subject. Would be good for the "Did you know..." section of the main page.
PlatinumX
Shouldn't that be a heptopus? Who named this thing? :-)
—Ed Cormany 05:00, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Reasons for removal:
removed due to lack of recent votes and age.
Burgundavia 00:49, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)
It appears
Comedy film is getting some attention - it would be nice to see some commentary to go with the listings though. I find I look at it and my mind goes blank. --
bodnotbod 19:59, Jun 1, 2004 (UTC)
Reasons for removal:
removed due to age and number of votes.
Burgundavia 00:49, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)
[[User:Meelar|
Meelar(talk)]] 16:40, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Comments:
Seems like a pretty decent article already.
Burgundavia 20:22, Jun 24, 2004 (UTC)
Well, it's decent, but it's only 5 paragraphs long. Ideally, 5 paragraphs should be the size of the summary in the lead section, not the size of the article in its entirety.
Fredrik |
talk 20:59, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Reasons for removal:
removed due to lack of votes and article size.
Burgundavia 00:49, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)
Why isn't this an article yet? There's numerous forms of studios to explore; art, dance, movie, radio, TV. I think this could turn into something quite nice if properly executed.
Sarge Baldy 21:30, Jun 9, 2004 (UTC)
Reasons for removal:
removed due to age and number of votes.
Burgundavia 00:50, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)
Oaktree b 01:30, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC) I'd like to see this featured. Could be interesting considering how photography is evolving, going more digital these days.
Potentially editors all over the world can contribute on local traditions - something that a lot of people can add to without massive research. --
ALargeElk |
Talk 13:11, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Reasons for removal:
removed due to age and number of votes.
Burgundavia 00:51, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)
Very basic information for such an influential and pioneering English archaeologist, whose techniques and methodology did so much to shape modern archaeology worldwide. Also a truly fascinating character in his own right.
Pjamescowie 09:03, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Seems a decent size article already, but you never know.
Burgundavia 10:11, Jun 27, 2004 (UTC)
Well, as an archaeologist, I do know - this short article in no way reflects the legacy of Petrie within the archaeological world.....
Pjamescowie 11:27, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Reasons for removal:
removed due to number of votes.
Burgundavia 00:52, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)
Denim has a well documented history, broad appeal, and a cruddy wikipedia stub.
Definitely. Denim jackets and jeans are iconic, and associated with several different decades in fashion. -
DropDeadGorgias(talk) 22:49, Jun 14, 2004 (UTC)
Reasons for removal:
removed due to age.
Burgundavia 00:55, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)
Drama seems very short to me, but it should be an overview of all the genres, the history and much more.
✏ Sverdrup
In what way would the proposed article differ from
Theater? Maybe the effort would be better used on improving that page.
Bmills 08:35, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Theatre encompasses the whole topic. This refers to a specific kind of theatre, the most common one. Comedy and Tragedy are also types of theatre.
Burgundavia 08:39, Jun 30, 2004 (UTC)
Reasons for removal:
Removed due to age and lack of votes after 4 weeks.
ALoan(Talk) 14:02, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)
19th century French
ballerina generally credited with developing the style of dancing
en pointe. Those topics could use articles, too. --
Seth Ilys 18:55, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
While we're on the topic,
ballet is pretty skimpy itself. [[User:Meelar|
Meelar(talk)]] 19:29, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
stub now exists but needs work
Ohka- 16:07, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Reasons for removal:
Removed due to lack of votes after 1 week.
ALoan(Talk) 16:05, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
It's a large template that is mostly not filled in. Different editors (myself included) have tried taking this article under our wing to make it fly, and found it far too vast for our knowledge to cover. It really needs many many eyes and minds to build out the various sections and make it something to be proud of.
Jwrosenzweig 23:19, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Gracious - that is ambitious! Isn't one article going to get a bit long and unwieldy? Perhaps it would be better to have a general article, not much longer than that there already, with links to specific articles on each sub-genre? --
ALoan(Talk) 13:55, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
I don't know what to say -- we should have a 30 K article on each of the Sections there, really. [[User:Sverdrup|❝Sverdrup❞]] 13:57, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
My point, really, is that it may be more effective to concentrate on one of the sub-genres (particularly one that does not exist) rather than the whole
history of literature. However, full marks for vision. --
ALoan(Talk) 10:48, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
There are already articles on
Literature,
Poetry,
Theatre,
Fiction and any number of national literatures and literary forms. I think this should be a short overview with a lot of links. Now, if anybody feels like tackling the
Literature page, that's another matter.
Bmills 14:23, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Reasons for removal:
Removed due to lack of votes after 1 week. --
Conti|
✉ 08:32, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
I would think such an important Islamic philosopher could use a lot more information. Qutb's teachings have been one of the biggest influences on
Islamic terrorism and in particular had an impact on
Osama bin Laden.
Sarge Baldy 03:50, Jul 9, 2004 (UTC)
I agree with the Sarge. There needs to be a lot more information here.
csloat 19:51, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Reasons for removal:
Lack of support after one week. --
ALoan(Talk) 10:30, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
This page contains nomiations from the main
Collaboration of the week page which have been removed due to lack of votes or because they're unsuitable nominations from
July 1 to
July 16,
2004.
Important musical topic that applies to almost all styles of music (
monophonic music being an exception) including
popular and
classical. (16th on google search)
Indeed. Very important topic.
Isomorphic 03:49, 13 May 2004 (UTC)reply
Reasons for removal:
Lack of votes and has been up for a while. Removed by
User:Raul654– PlatinumX 07:18, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)
[[User:OldakQuill|
OldakQuill]] 10:21, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Comments
This is an exciting and fruitful topic. It is a theory of cognition that aims to explain how humans are creative and in general how meaning is generated. I've added close to 50 links in the
Talk:Conceptual_blending/Resources section. These links taken together provide enough of a definitive base to write an accurate and comprehensive encyclopedic article. --
Gyan 22:16, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)-
I'm calling for volunteers to help me with this article. I've setup a
Draft space, for article discussion. I shall put up an outline soon to get things started. --
Gyan 22:16, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)-
Reasons for removal:
Lack of votes and has been up for a while. Removed by
User:Raul654– PlatinumX 07:18, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Taxobox-only stub I created when making all of the family pages for
Wikipedia:WikiProject Cephalopods. Would be a good article to get folks interested in the WikiProject, andwho can resist such an interestingly named creature! -
UtherSRG
Google returns a very scant amount of information - this will be hard to research. On the flip side, this means that wikipedia could be the source for info on this rather interesting subject. Would be good for the "Did you know..." section of the main page.
PlatinumX
Shouldn't that be a heptopus? Who named this thing? :-)
—Ed Cormany 05:00, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Reasons for removal:
removed due to lack of recent votes and age.
Burgundavia 00:49, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)
It appears
Comedy film is getting some attention - it would be nice to see some commentary to go with the listings though. I find I look at it and my mind goes blank. --
bodnotbod 19:59, Jun 1, 2004 (UTC)
Reasons for removal:
removed due to age and number of votes.
Burgundavia 00:49, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)
[[User:Meelar|
Meelar(talk)]] 16:40, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Comments:
Seems like a pretty decent article already.
Burgundavia 20:22, Jun 24, 2004 (UTC)
Well, it's decent, but it's only 5 paragraphs long. Ideally, 5 paragraphs should be the size of the summary in the lead section, not the size of the article in its entirety.
Fredrik |
talk 20:59, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Reasons for removal:
removed due to lack of votes and article size.
Burgundavia 00:49, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)
Why isn't this an article yet? There's numerous forms of studios to explore; art, dance, movie, radio, TV. I think this could turn into something quite nice if properly executed.
Sarge Baldy 21:30, Jun 9, 2004 (UTC)
Reasons for removal:
removed due to age and number of votes.
Burgundavia 00:50, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)
Oaktree b 01:30, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC) I'd like to see this featured. Could be interesting considering how photography is evolving, going more digital these days.
Potentially editors all over the world can contribute on local traditions - something that a lot of people can add to without massive research. --
ALargeElk |
Talk 13:11, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Reasons for removal:
removed due to age and number of votes.
Burgundavia 00:51, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)
Very basic information for such an influential and pioneering English archaeologist, whose techniques and methodology did so much to shape modern archaeology worldwide. Also a truly fascinating character in his own right.
Pjamescowie 09:03, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Seems a decent size article already, but you never know.
Burgundavia 10:11, Jun 27, 2004 (UTC)
Well, as an archaeologist, I do know - this short article in no way reflects the legacy of Petrie within the archaeological world.....
Pjamescowie 11:27, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Reasons for removal:
removed due to number of votes.
Burgundavia 00:52, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)
Denim has a well documented history, broad appeal, and a cruddy wikipedia stub.
Definitely. Denim jackets and jeans are iconic, and associated with several different decades in fashion. -
DropDeadGorgias(talk) 22:49, Jun 14, 2004 (UTC)
Reasons for removal:
removed due to age.
Burgundavia 00:55, Jul 5, 2004 (UTC)
Drama seems very short to me, but it should be an overview of all the genres, the history and much more.
✏ Sverdrup
In what way would the proposed article differ from
Theater? Maybe the effort would be better used on improving that page.
Bmills 08:35, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Theatre encompasses the whole topic. This refers to a specific kind of theatre, the most common one. Comedy and Tragedy are also types of theatre.
Burgundavia 08:39, Jun 30, 2004 (UTC)
Reasons for removal:
Removed due to age and lack of votes after 4 weeks.
ALoan(Talk) 14:02, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)
19th century French
ballerina generally credited with developing the style of dancing
en pointe. Those topics could use articles, too. --
Seth Ilys 18:55, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
While we're on the topic,
ballet is pretty skimpy itself. [[User:Meelar|
Meelar(talk)]] 19:29, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
stub now exists but needs work
Ohka- 16:07, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Reasons for removal:
Removed due to lack of votes after 1 week.
ALoan(Talk) 16:05, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
It's a large template that is mostly not filled in. Different editors (myself included) have tried taking this article under our wing to make it fly, and found it far too vast for our knowledge to cover. It really needs many many eyes and minds to build out the various sections and make it something to be proud of.
Jwrosenzweig 23:19, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Gracious - that is ambitious! Isn't one article going to get a bit long and unwieldy? Perhaps it would be better to have a general article, not much longer than that there already, with links to specific articles on each sub-genre? --
ALoan(Talk) 13:55, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
I don't know what to say -- we should have a 30 K article on each of the Sections there, really. [[User:Sverdrup|❝Sverdrup❞]] 13:57, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
My point, really, is that it may be more effective to concentrate on one of the sub-genres (particularly one that does not exist) rather than the whole
history of literature. However, full marks for vision. --
ALoan(Talk) 10:48, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
There are already articles on
Literature,
Poetry,
Theatre,
Fiction and any number of national literatures and literary forms. I think this should be a short overview with a lot of links. Now, if anybody feels like tackling the
Literature page, that's another matter.
Bmills 14:23, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Reasons for removal:
Removed due to lack of votes after 1 week. --
Conti|
✉ 08:32, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
I would think such an important Islamic philosopher could use a lot more information. Qutb's teachings have been one of the biggest influences on
Islamic terrorism and in particular had an impact on
Osama bin Laden.
Sarge Baldy 03:50, Jul 9, 2004 (UTC)
I agree with the Sarge. There needs to be a lot more information here.
csloat 19:51, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Reasons for removal:
Lack of support after one week. --
ALoan(Talk) 10:30, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)