Numerous concerns of violations of:
- WP:RS and WP:V - the article contains no reliable sources for any of the information on the page, which means it can't establish its notability that smooth jazz does have, ie. it is a major jazz genre with a lot of radio coverage, especially in the USA and on the Internet;
- WP:NPOV - a number of editors have concerns over the criticism section, as well as peacock terms. To quote a few people on the talk page, it needs to be less editorial and less like "an impassioned talk show debate, on both sides";
- WP:NOT#DIR & WP:EL - the lists of smooth jazz radio stations as external links.
The whole article needs a major cleanup, if not rewrite. I have also asked for help from WikiProject Jazz to help. -- tgheretford ( talk) 16:02, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Added to User:Gronkmeister/Desk -- tgheretford ( talk) 19:02, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Numerous concerns of violations of:
- WP:RS and WP:V - the article contains no reliable sources for any of the information on the page, which means it can't establish its notability that smooth jazz does have, ie. it is a major jazz genre with a lot of radio coverage, especially in the USA and on the Internet;
- WP:NPOV - a number of editors have concerns over the criticism section, as well as peacock terms. To quote a few people on the talk page, it needs to be less editorial and less like "an impassioned talk show debate, on both sides";
- WP:NOT#DIR & WP:EL - the lists of smooth jazz radio stations as external links.
The whole article needs a major cleanup, if not rewrite. I have also asked for help from WikiProject Jazz to help. -- tgheretford ( talk) 16:02, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Added to User:Gronkmeister/Desk -- tgheretford ( talk) 19:02, 10 June 2007 (UTC)