This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
current talk page.
This page consists of entries that have been addressed and cleaned up, or are over one year old.
Expired entries
February 2021
Manuel Fal Conde - This article has multiple issues, it has a non-academic writing style, the chronology of this article is hard to follow, there are several grammatical or spelling errors. I think this article was translated from Spanish by a non-native speaker of English, as several definite articles are missing.
Xwedodah (
talk)
03:52, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Partly done checked the "External links" section and removed some sources. It is strange that the Spanish version of the article is 10 times shorter than the English one. --
Bbarmadillo (
talk)
16:30, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Thecho - Some sections are like lists. They need to be converted into the prose. Further, the article is unreferenced and citations should be added. –Kammill ⟨
talk⟩
08:51, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Marcelo Salas - this is an article about a very important footballer, but it is poorly written, and it seems like many parts were translated from Spanish literally. The intro seems to be too long and has too much information, some of it of dubious importance.--
Celtic1985 (
talk)
14:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
List of Tom and Jerry characters - List of characters in the cartoon Tom and Jerry. Massive amount of uncited fancruft and outright false information, such as giving names to unnamed characters and listing brief visual gags as a character in of themselves, as well as odd non-sequitur statements such as "There is some debate as to whether this is the genuine Clint Clobber as the original Clint would never be an outright animal abuser; he was just a put-upon grouch". A lot of the false information given seems to also be on the Tom & Jerry fandom wiki.
Waxworker (
talk)
07:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Note: Not all of it may be false information. There are nicknames to almost all the characters in the Tom and Jerry universe, so it's possible someone heard about these nicknames and put them in the page. So I would keep the normally unnamed characters in, but remove the breif visual gag characters as you said.
Phantasm99 (
talk)
18:50, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
EA Play - Information is outdated, insufficient information about the Origin version of the service, essential information is scattered across paragraphs with lengthy sentences.
The k nine 2 (
talk)
18:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment: Way too many line breaks as per
MOS:PARA. Needs a lot of attention. Paragraphs need to be combined and the
WP:TOC should be subsection-ified. I'll try but it's going to need the attention of a better editor.
Catalyzzt (
talk)
14:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Dennis the Menace (U.S. comics) - An American comic strip about a mischievous boy named Dennis, not to be confused with a similar British strip of the same name. Fancruft and tone issues, as well as reliance on primary sources - a good chunk of the references on the article are the comic itself or unsuitable refs such as IMDB or the
Grand Comics Database, which I'm not sure of the reliability of. I've already removed some particuilarly inappropriate refs such as links to search results on Bing.
Waxworker (
talk)
16:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Schrödinger's cat in popular culture - Examples of the thought experiment Schrödinger's cat in pop culture. Excessive pop culture trivia that is uncited or cites itself, and there are inappropriate sources like Amazon and Facebook. I already removed an inappropriate section titled "merchandise", as it consisted of a bunch of links to buy shirts with Schrödinger's cat on them on sites like ThinkGeek.
Waxworker (
talk)
14:08, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment: - How would everyone here feel about nominating this article for deletion? It breaks a lot of rules on indiscriminate fan trivia and unreliable sources. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (
TALK|
CONTRIBS) 14:46, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
The above suggestion has not attracted any support so it's off the table. The article seems to have some semi-regular editors who add things periodically, so cleaning it up might work better in the form of discussions with them at the article's talk page. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (
TALK|
CONTRIBS) 20:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
In fact, I am considering taking it to AfD, as there is just one appropriately sourced statement about it in general and exactly one appropriately sourced statement about a specific case (that is, the source is independent, though it's a brief mention), so the only way I see to clean this up with the current sourcing is to remove 98% of the article. PJvanMill)
talk(01:21, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Johnson & Johnson#Coronavirus (COVID-19) - This section just sloppy. Tense errors like thinking September 2020's in the future. Lots of small paragraphs that were added when they were fresh. Poor transitions. In short, a lot of additions as the news came out, but it really needs to be thought through, molded into sensible paragraphs—stuff like that. Maybe it can just be stripped down since there's
a full article about this?
Thmazing (
talk)
07:08, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Gals Panic - A Japanese series of erotic games predominately released for arcades. Massive amounts of uncited gamecruft - article is insanely long for what it is.
Waxworker (
talk)
22:52, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Partly done Checked the publications and removed less important ones, checked book reviews and removed promo citations from the publisher. --
Bbarmadillo (
talk)
19:55, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Amiga Power - Defunct 90's British gaming magazine dedicated to the Amiga line of computers. Lots of original research, promotional tone issues, and a lot of fancruft, with a good chunk of the article focusing on recurring jokes in the magazine.
Waxworker (
talk)
15:43, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Partly done - Fixed most of the tone issues and removed some uncited cruft. Still needs more citations and less original research. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Taeluta (
talk •
contribs)
05:29, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Language interoperability - about programming language interoperability. An important concept with a low quality article. At least the grammar needs to be fixed, but it would be good to rewrite the entire thing. The section about VMs seems unrelated to me.
Akeosnhaoe (
talk)
06:14, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Nickelodeon Toys - Toys manufactured by kids television network Nickelodeon. Lots of original research, I've already removed some unreliable sources like Pininterest and Reddit.
Waxworker (
talk)
15:21, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Teleserye - similar problems, with lots of fancruft and requires verification. There were proposals to merge it with
telenovela, but nothing's come of it. Can someone have a look at this?
Image2012 (
talk)
12:28, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
R. Ponnappan Nadar - Except for the first few paragraphs, the article is entirely copied from his (no longer available) foundation's biography page
[1], however I'm not sure how credible that information is or if the subject is even notable enough for Wikipedia. –
Normal Name (
talk)
05:12, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Partly done - trimmed a bit, added an advert tag - the article looks very promotional to me, but as I am not competent in the sphere, I'd prefer someone else take a look at it.
Less Unless (
talk)
10:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Seijuu Sentai Gingaman - This article is among several other articles related to Super Sentai that contains original research and fancruft issues with issues for this dating back to March 2008. I would trim it myself but afraid to have the pitchforks from some fans come after me if the section detailing the characters and arsenal is better suitable for RangerWiki is trimmed down. But in my opinion, it seriously needs to be trimmed for general audiences to understand better.
Pahiy (
talk)
18:43, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
August 2021
Romani society and culture - article contains large spelling, grammatical, and stylistic errors, significant unsubstantiated claims and overly biased assertions (especially in relation to the origin of the Romani people), and overall unencyclopedic formatting and tone.
Builder018 (
talk)
11:26, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Love Showdown (Archie Comics) – A rather notable Archie Comics storyline from the mid-1990s, the article may be in the territory of fancruft and original research. I'm thinking with a few citations (articles about the storyline that the only Internet Archive citation mentioned in passing, the aftermath of the storyline, and its impact years later.) could help expand the article.Pahiy (
talk)
14:05, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
South Yorkshire Transport - Tagging because while I thought this had only one section that was biased, it appears the entire article, written in 2007, massively fails
WP:NPOV, barely makes use of one source and seems to have been written with some sort of malice by the original creator - see recently deleted entry on competition between companies. Would like some pointers on where I can go with it, or perhaps a decision on scrapping the article entirely and starting anew/merge it into either
South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive/
First South Yorkshire. For those in the know, should I write about Mainline in that article or does that go in
First South Yorkshire? Unsure if this should go here, but worth a shot at discussing.
Hullian111 (
talk)
21:32, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Magic Knight - Fictional knight that stars in a series of 80's computer games. The article has tone issues, and alternates between being about the character itself, and the game series it stars in as a whole. Original research and slight gamecruft issues.
Waxworker (
talk)
14:38, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Appreciation Index - There are quite a few broken links here and there in this article that need some updating, as the information provided talks about the average AIs from a decade ago and needs to be updated to be more recent.
Pahiy (
talk)
21:21, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
List of Sundance Film Festival selections - Formatting and wikilinking issues. Wikilinks in section headers that aren't particularly pertinent. Last decade is basically links to other articles, but prior to that are huge tables. Probably duplicate information (films listed in both another article plus listed here).
Platonk (
talk)
03:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Nintendo Gamer - Defunct British gamaing magazine dedicated to Nintendo games and hardware. Original research and fancruft issues, I've already removed sections dedicated to recurring jokes and a table of the highest scoring games, but the 'sections/features' section still needs trimming.Waxworker (
talk)
15:54, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Partly done: trimmed and condensed a large portion of that section, reducing list entries to one or two sentences each; also cleaned up refs.
Aranya(talk)03:45, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Jampack - "Jampack Demos & Videos Listed" is a strangely-formatted list that's difficult to read. Also, there are a few issues in the lead, I think.AdoTang (
talk)
03:20, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Done. I went ahead and removed the list, as it's poorly sourced and WP isn't a directory for every single video game demo in the Jampack releases.
Bridget(talk)16:33, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Struck the above. The article was significantly overhauled on 9 December 2021 (
diff), and the Unreliable sources and Original research templates were removed from atop the article in the process. North America100018:57, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Client state#21st century - This section in particular is filled with entries that either have 1. No citations, or 2. Citations that lead to opinion pieces, unreliable sources, sources that don't even mention what the citation is supposed to be supporting, or outright blog posts
Rousillon (
talk)
17:18, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
@
Less Unless: Sorry I should have specified there are a couple "
no-target errors" with the inline {{harv}} citations. Some of the citations had publication years that were different than the full citations they were pointing to. I think this should be fixed now though. Best,
Bridget(talk)16:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Done Instead of replacing, I removed the part which this source cites. It cited that their music was referred to as "acid-psych" but I couldn't find any other source that supports this statement.
Excellenc1 (talk)
07:25, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Carlo Forlanini - An article with lots of good information about a seemingly important figure in medicine. It just has a weird kind of list-type format that would read much better in actual paragraphs. -- Fyrael (
talk)
14:15, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
That's not what I meant, sorry for not making that clear from the beginning. I meant the references were poorly formatted
Jenkowelten (
talk)
05:59, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Charles Edward Stuart - I recently expanded this article and added a lot of new text/references. It is currently on hold during a
GA because of "mistakes concerning grammar, clarity, and punctuation." Would greatly welcome anyone who would contribute by cleaning up these elements. Thank you.Coldupnorth (
talk)
17:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Partly done Deleted listings with no articles, and fixed the links on the "by type" section. Didn't add any references though.
Xwedodah (
talk)
04:23, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
@
Xwedodah: I think you dealt with the issues with the red-linked entries! I don't think we need to add references to any of the blue-linked entries since they all have Wikipedia articles, so I've struck the above entry. Thanks for your help!
Bridget(talk)21:46, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Police vehicles in the United States and Canada - Article is predominantly sourced from content found at policecararchives.org (a self-published online database) which is not cited but mentioned only in the external link section. Article is mostly uncited, and it has been this way since it was created in 2006, having gone through a series of expansions with several other online self-published websites/databases. See this
2010 version. Probably should be AfD'd, but could use another pair of eyes for evaluation to see if it could be cleaned up (with a chainsaw trimming job).Platonk (
talk)
02:27, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Done – I think. Removed the "Models by manufacturer", "Other police vehicles", and "Future" sections (too difficult to work with, mostly unsourced or unnecessary information anyway), added some information and images, and added more citations.
AdoTang (
talk)
00:44, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Not done –
Mocha c jp, this, now a redirect from a page move, and this article was created by mistake, are beyond the scope of this project. Based on the article's history, I believe seeking guidance at the
Help desk would be best. Thank you! — WILDSTARTALK15:44, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Done Converted lists to tables where needed, I didn't remove them because I would love if someone who knows Thai could look in the Thai Wikipedia article and grab sources from there.
TheManInTheBlackHat(Talk)02:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
current talk page.
This page consists of entries that have been addressed and cleaned up, or are over one year old.
Expired entries
February 2021
Manuel Fal Conde - This article has multiple issues, it has a non-academic writing style, the chronology of this article is hard to follow, there are several grammatical or spelling errors. I think this article was translated from Spanish by a non-native speaker of English, as several definite articles are missing.
Xwedodah (
talk)
03:52, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Partly done checked the "External links" section and removed some sources. It is strange that the Spanish version of the article is 10 times shorter than the English one. --
Bbarmadillo (
talk)
16:30, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Thecho - Some sections are like lists. They need to be converted into the prose. Further, the article is unreferenced and citations should be added. –Kammill ⟨
talk⟩
08:51, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Marcelo Salas - this is an article about a very important footballer, but it is poorly written, and it seems like many parts were translated from Spanish literally. The intro seems to be too long and has too much information, some of it of dubious importance.--
Celtic1985 (
talk)
14:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
List of Tom and Jerry characters - List of characters in the cartoon Tom and Jerry. Massive amount of uncited fancruft and outright false information, such as giving names to unnamed characters and listing brief visual gags as a character in of themselves, as well as odd non-sequitur statements such as "There is some debate as to whether this is the genuine Clint Clobber as the original Clint would never be an outright animal abuser; he was just a put-upon grouch". A lot of the false information given seems to also be on the Tom & Jerry fandom wiki.
Waxworker (
talk)
07:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Note: Not all of it may be false information. There are nicknames to almost all the characters in the Tom and Jerry universe, so it's possible someone heard about these nicknames and put them in the page. So I would keep the normally unnamed characters in, but remove the breif visual gag characters as you said.
Phantasm99 (
talk)
18:50, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
EA Play - Information is outdated, insufficient information about the Origin version of the service, essential information is scattered across paragraphs with lengthy sentences.
The k nine 2 (
talk)
18:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment: Way too many line breaks as per
MOS:PARA. Needs a lot of attention. Paragraphs need to be combined and the
WP:TOC should be subsection-ified. I'll try but it's going to need the attention of a better editor.
Catalyzzt (
talk)
14:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Dennis the Menace (U.S. comics) - An American comic strip about a mischievous boy named Dennis, not to be confused with a similar British strip of the same name. Fancruft and tone issues, as well as reliance on primary sources - a good chunk of the references on the article are the comic itself or unsuitable refs such as IMDB or the
Grand Comics Database, which I'm not sure of the reliability of. I've already removed some particuilarly inappropriate refs such as links to search results on Bing.
Waxworker (
talk)
16:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Schrödinger's cat in popular culture - Examples of the thought experiment Schrödinger's cat in pop culture. Excessive pop culture trivia that is uncited or cites itself, and there are inappropriate sources like Amazon and Facebook. I already removed an inappropriate section titled "merchandise", as it consisted of a bunch of links to buy shirts with Schrödinger's cat on them on sites like ThinkGeek.
Waxworker (
talk)
14:08, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment: - How would everyone here feel about nominating this article for deletion? It breaks a lot of rules on indiscriminate fan trivia and unreliable sources. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (
TALK|
CONTRIBS) 14:46, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
The above suggestion has not attracted any support so it's off the table. The article seems to have some semi-regular editors who add things periodically, so cleaning it up might work better in the form of discussions with them at the article's talk page. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (
TALK|
CONTRIBS) 20:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
In fact, I am considering taking it to AfD, as there is just one appropriately sourced statement about it in general and exactly one appropriately sourced statement about a specific case (that is, the source is independent, though it's a brief mention), so the only way I see to clean this up with the current sourcing is to remove 98% of the article. PJvanMill)
talk(01:21, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Johnson & Johnson#Coronavirus (COVID-19) - This section just sloppy. Tense errors like thinking September 2020's in the future. Lots of small paragraphs that were added when they were fresh. Poor transitions. In short, a lot of additions as the news came out, but it really needs to be thought through, molded into sensible paragraphs—stuff like that. Maybe it can just be stripped down since there's
a full article about this?
Thmazing (
talk)
07:08, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Gals Panic - A Japanese series of erotic games predominately released for arcades. Massive amounts of uncited gamecruft - article is insanely long for what it is.
Waxworker (
talk)
22:52, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Partly done Checked the publications and removed less important ones, checked book reviews and removed promo citations from the publisher. --
Bbarmadillo (
talk)
19:55, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Amiga Power - Defunct 90's British gaming magazine dedicated to the Amiga line of computers. Lots of original research, promotional tone issues, and a lot of fancruft, with a good chunk of the article focusing on recurring jokes in the magazine.
Waxworker (
talk)
15:43, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Partly done - Fixed most of the tone issues and removed some uncited cruft. Still needs more citations and less original research. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Taeluta (
talk •
contribs)
05:29, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Language interoperability - about programming language interoperability. An important concept with a low quality article. At least the grammar needs to be fixed, but it would be good to rewrite the entire thing. The section about VMs seems unrelated to me.
Akeosnhaoe (
talk)
06:14, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Nickelodeon Toys - Toys manufactured by kids television network Nickelodeon. Lots of original research, I've already removed some unreliable sources like Pininterest and Reddit.
Waxworker (
talk)
15:21, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Teleserye - similar problems, with lots of fancruft and requires verification. There were proposals to merge it with
telenovela, but nothing's come of it. Can someone have a look at this?
Image2012 (
talk)
12:28, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
R. Ponnappan Nadar - Except for the first few paragraphs, the article is entirely copied from his (no longer available) foundation's biography page
[1], however I'm not sure how credible that information is or if the subject is even notable enough for Wikipedia. –
Normal Name (
talk)
05:12, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Partly done - trimmed a bit, added an advert tag - the article looks very promotional to me, but as I am not competent in the sphere, I'd prefer someone else take a look at it.
Less Unless (
talk)
10:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Seijuu Sentai Gingaman - This article is among several other articles related to Super Sentai that contains original research and fancruft issues with issues for this dating back to March 2008. I would trim it myself but afraid to have the pitchforks from some fans come after me if the section detailing the characters and arsenal is better suitable for RangerWiki is trimmed down. But in my opinion, it seriously needs to be trimmed for general audiences to understand better.
Pahiy (
talk)
18:43, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
August 2021
Romani society and culture - article contains large spelling, grammatical, and stylistic errors, significant unsubstantiated claims and overly biased assertions (especially in relation to the origin of the Romani people), and overall unencyclopedic formatting and tone.
Builder018 (
talk)
11:26, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Love Showdown (Archie Comics) – A rather notable Archie Comics storyline from the mid-1990s, the article may be in the territory of fancruft and original research. I'm thinking with a few citations (articles about the storyline that the only Internet Archive citation mentioned in passing, the aftermath of the storyline, and its impact years later.) could help expand the article.Pahiy (
talk)
14:05, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
South Yorkshire Transport - Tagging because while I thought this had only one section that was biased, it appears the entire article, written in 2007, massively fails
WP:NPOV, barely makes use of one source and seems to have been written with some sort of malice by the original creator - see recently deleted entry on competition between companies. Would like some pointers on where I can go with it, or perhaps a decision on scrapping the article entirely and starting anew/merge it into either
South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive/
First South Yorkshire. For those in the know, should I write about Mainline in that article or does that go in
First South Yorkshire? Unsure if this should go here, but worth a shot at discussing.
Hullian111 (
talk)
21:32, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Magic Knight - Fictional knight that stars in a series of 80's computer games. The article has tone issues, and alternates between being about the character itself, and the game series it stars in as a whole. Original research and slight gamecruft issues.
Waxworker (
talk)
14:38, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Appreciation Index - There are quite a few broken links here and there in this article that need some updating, as the information provided talks about the average AIs from a decade ago and needs to be updated to be more recent.
Pahiy (
talk)
21:21, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
List of Sundance Film Festival selections - Formatting and wikilinking issues. Wikilinks in section headers that aren't particularly pertinent. Last decade is basically links to other articles, but prior to that are huge tables. Probably duplicate information (films listed in both another article plus listed here).
Platonk (
talk)
03:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Nintendo Gamer - Defunct British gamaing magazine dedicated to Nintendo games and hardware. Original research and fancruft issues, I've already removed sections dedicated to recurring jokes and a table of the highest scoring games, but the 'sections/features' section still needs trimming.Waxworker (
talk)
15:54, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Partly done: trimmed and condensed a large portion of that section, reducing list entries to one or two sentences each; also cleaned up refs.
Aranya(talk)03:45, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Jampack - "Jampack Demos & Videos Listed" is a strangely-formatted list that's difficult to read. Also, there are a few issues in the lead, I think.AdoTang (
talk)
03:20, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Done. I went ahead and removed the list, as it's poorly sourced and WP isn't a directory for every single video game demo in the Jampack releases.
Bridget(talk)16:33, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Struck the above. The article was significantly overhauled on 9 December 2021 (
diff), and the Unreliable sources and Original research templates were removed from atop the article in the process. North America100018:57, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Client state#21st century - This section in particular is filled with entries that either have 1. No citations, or 2. Citations that lead to opinion pieces, unreliable sources, sources that don't even mention what the citation is supposed to be supporting, or outright blog posts
Rousillon (
talk)
17:18, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
@
Less Unless: Sorry I should have specified there are a couple "
no-target errors" with the inline {{harv}} citations. Some of the citations had publication years that were different than the full citations they were pointing to. I think this should be fixed now though. Best,
Bridget(talk)16:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Done Instead of replacing, I removed the part which this source cites. It cited that their music was referred to as "acid-psych" but I couldn't find any other source that supports this statement.
Excellenc1 (talk)
07:25, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Carlo Forlanini - An article with lots of good information about a seemingly important figure in medicine. It just has a weird kind of list-type format that would read much better in actual paragraphs. -- Fyrael (
talk)
14:15, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
That's not what I meant, sorry for not making that clear from the beginning. I meant the references were poorly formatted
Jenkowelten (
talk)
05:59, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Charles Edward Stuart - I recently expanded this article and added a lot of new text/references. It is currently on hold during a
GA because of "mistakes concerning grammar, clarity, and punctuation." Would greatly welcome anyone who would contribute by cleaning up these elements. Thank you.Coldupnorth (
talk)
17:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Partly done Deleted listings with no articles, and fixed the links on the "by type" section. Didn't add any references though.
Xwedodah (
talk)
04:23, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
@
Xwedodah: I think you dealt with the issues with the red-linked entries! I don't think we need to add references to any of the blue-linked entries since they all have Wikipedia articles, so I've struck the above entry. Thanks for your help!
Bridget(talk)21:46, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Police vehicles in the United States and Canada - Article is predominantly sourced from content found at policecararchives.org (a self-published online database) which is not cited but mentioned only in the external link section. Article is mostly uncited, and it has been this way since it was created in 2006, having gone through a series of expansions with several other online self-published websites/databases. See this
2010 version. Probably should be AfD'd, but could use another pair of eyes for evaluation to see if it could be cleaned up (with a chainsaw trimming job).Platonk (
talk)
02:27, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Done – I think. Removed the "Models by manufacturer", "Other police vehicles", and "Future" sections (too difficult to work with, mostly unsourced or unnecessary information anyway), added some information and images, and added more citations.
AdoTang (
talk)
00:44, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Not done –
Mocha c jp, this, now a redirect from a page move, and this article was created by mistake, are beyond the scope of this project. Based on the article's history, I believe seeking guidance at the
Help desk would be best. Thank you! — WILDSTARTALK15:44, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Done Converted lists to tables where needed, I didn't remove them because I would love if someone who knows Thai could look in the Thai Wikipedia article and grab sources from there.
TheManInTheBlackHat(Talk)02:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)