The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Trivial intersection per
WP:EGRS/I. Filipino ancestry is rather irrelevant to sports performance.
Place Clichy (
talk) 23:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Would appear to be something of a
WP:NARROWCAT with no real reason for its existence. Doesn't really belong in "fictional populated places", as it lists novels, not places.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 23:09, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Support per nom
Mason (
talk) 20:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
✗plicit 00:29, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete The category can be filled considering that
Edward VIII,
George VI,
Elizabeth II (reportedly) and
Charles III all had cancer (and I'm sure we can find monarchs from other countries) but the nominator's point is valid. No parent category exists that encompasses all people who suffered from the disease, so why should we have it for monarchs specifically? Keivan.fTalk 23:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
CommentВекочел, why did you start a discussion on this category at CFD when it was already tagged for speedy deletion, CSD C1? It didn't need a week-long discussion. LizRead!Talk! 04:54, 16 February 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Liz: I do not agree here. It does require a discussion and emptying the category was premature.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 09:19, 16 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Marcocapelle has a point here.
Векочел (
talk) 13:28, 16 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:14th-century Protestants
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:20th-century Sammarinese educators
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's not enough Sammarinese educators pages to justify diffusion by century
Mason (
talk) 19:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People of Mon descent
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Contrary to what the name suggests, this category is not for people based on their ancestry. Its only content is child
Category:Families of Mon ancestry, which is already at parent
Category:Mon people. This is not helpful for navigation.
Place Clichy (
talk) 17:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge per nom. Ultimately the tree just contains branches of the Thai royal family, so I suspect that there is more redundancy here.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 22:18, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Lists of Bollywood films by year
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:rename aligning with the article titles in this category.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 14:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:State civil service commissions
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:speedy delete. CSD G7, just tag it for speedy deletion, it doesn't need a week-long discussion. LizRead!Talk! 07:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Lists of Czechoslovak people by occupation
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Redundant category layer
Mason (
talk) 03:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge per nom. The subcategory may be nominated too.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 08:50, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:University of Pennsylvania Graduate Division School of Arts & Sciences alumni
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: I don't think we need to distinguish between whether their Arts and Science degree from upenn was for graduate versus undergraduate study
Mason (
talk) 23:09, 2 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 00:13, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional conjoined twins
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support per nom
Mason (
talk) 03:53, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Rename and re-parent per nom.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 08:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
VegaDark (
talk) 21:31, 15 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:1890 Colorado Football Association season
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only a single redirect in here, which isn't helpful for navigation
Mason (
talk) 00:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Just delete, in the article to which is being redirected there is no substantial information about the 1890 season.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 08:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. There are zero articles in the category. The only content is a redirect to an overall program article.
Cbl62 (
talk) 17:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Trivial intersection per
WP:EGRS/I. Filipino ancestry is rather irrelevant to sports performance.
Place Clichy (
talk) 23:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Would appear to be something of a
WP:NARROWCAT with no real reason for its existence. Doesn't really belong in "fictional populated places", as it lists novels, not places.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 23:09, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Support per nom
Mason (
talk) 20:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
✗plicit 00:29, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete The category can be filled considering that
Edward VIII,
George VI,
Elizabeth II (reportedly) and
Charles III all had cancer (and I'm sure we can find monarchs from other countries) but the nominator's point is valid. No parent category exists that encompasses all people who suffered from the disease, so why should we have it for monarchs specifically? Keivan.fTalk 23:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
CommentВекочел, why did you start a discussion on this category at CFD when it was already tagged for speedy deletion, CSD C1? It didn't need a week-long discussion. LizRead!Talk! 04:54, 16 February 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Liz: I do not agree here. It does require a discussion and emptying the category was premature.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 09:19, 16 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Marcocapelle has a point here.
Векочел (
talk) 13:28, 16 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:14th-century Protestants
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:20th-century Sammarinese educators
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's not enough Sammarinese educators pages to justify diffusion by century
Mason (
talk) 19:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People of Mon descent
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Contrary to what the name suggests, this category is not for people based on their ancestry. Its only content is child
Category:Families of Mon ancestry, which is already at parent
Category:Mon people. This is not helpful for navigation.
Place Clichy (
talk) 17:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge per nom. Ultimately the tree just contains branches of the Thai royal family, so I suspect that there is more redundancy here.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 22:18, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Lists of Bollywood films by year
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:rename aligning with the article titles in this category.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 14:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:State civil service commissions
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:speedy delete. CSD G7, just tag it for speedy deletion, it doesn't need a week-long discussion. LizRead!Talk! 07:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Lists of Czechoslovak people by occupation
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Redundant category layer
Mason (
talk) 03:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge per nom. The subcategory may be nominated too.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 08:50, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:University of Pennsylvania Graduate Division School of Arts & Sciences alumni
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: I don't think we need to distinguish between whether their Arts and Science degree from upenn was for graduate versus undergraduate study
Mason (
talk) 23:09, 2 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 00:13, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional conjoined twins
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support per nom
Mason (
talk) 03:53, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Rename and re-parent per nom.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 08:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
VegaDark (
talk) 21:31, 15 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:1890 Colorado Football Association season
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only a single redirect in here, which isn't helpful for navigation
Mason (
talk) 00:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Just delete, in the article to which is being redirected there is no substantial information about the 1890 season.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 08:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. There are zero articles in the category. The only content is a redirect to an overall program article.
Cbl62 (
talk) 17:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.