Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< January 30 February 1 >

January 31

Category:Wikipedians interest in energy drink

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering ( talk) 20:44, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:USERCAT for lacking any discernible collaborative function - see WP:UCFD/I#Food, drink, and consumables * Pppery * it has begun... 23:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Founders of philosophical traditions

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering ( talk) 20:45, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: WP:SUBJECTIVECAT, the definition of what constitutes a "founder" or a "philosophical tradition" is so vague that these people will have little in common other than "being very famous" - car chasm ( talk) 23:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Museums in Fort Collins, Colorado

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge Timrollpickering ( talk) 20:46, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. This category contains only 1 entry, as does Category:Museums in Larimer County, Colorado. User:Namiba 23:06, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
It doesn't make sense to merge into another category which is also too small to justify existence.-- User:Namiba 17:23, 1 February 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Feel free to nominate that category for merging too. While it still exists it should be populated though. Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:05, 1 February 2023 (UTC) reply
  • I've added it to this nomination.-- User:Namiba 20:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Philosophical traditions and Category:Philosophical movements

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 21:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: "School" and "tradition" and "movement" are mostly synonymous words that are all used interchangeably. Not a WP:DEFINING characteristic of any one of the three labels. - car chasm ( talk) 20:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect and rename — per Fayenatic london, leave a redirect on the merged categories. Rename the others without redirect.
    William Allen Simpson ( talk) 08:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bronze Age literature

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 February 12#Category:Bronze Age literature

Category:Critics of Marxism

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 February 9#Category:Critics of Marxism

Category:Flavin enzymes and Category:Flavoprotein enzymes to Category:Flavoproteins

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 20:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: The categories are synonyms; the shortest and most established name is Flavoprotein; the word 'enzyme' is a pleonasm. -- TadejM my talk 17:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Support. Flavoprotein is the common term. ― Syn path 07:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ice hockey in Savannah, Georgia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 20:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. Only 2 articles, unlikely to grow. No opposition to recreation w/ growth. User:Namiba 16:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:History of foreign relations of Romania

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge Timrollpickering ( talk) 20:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: same. 寒吉 ( talk) 11:21, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Presocratic philosophical literature

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 February 9#Category:Presocratic philosophical literature

Category:Underground rapid transit stations located above ground in the United States

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete/Merge Timrollpickering ( talk) 20:49, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Very recently created category that does not meet WP:CATDEFINING. While stations can generally be said to be above or below ground, they are not commonly and consistently referred to as such. AFAICT, these were all recently created by a single editor without discussion.
Delete where already categorized by line. Upmerge where the stations are not already in another subcategory.
See recent:
  1. Deleted Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 2#Category:SkyTrain (Vancouver) stations located above ground
  2. Deleted Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 11#Category:Underground rapid transit stations located above ground
  3. Deleted Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 12#Category:Underground rapid transit stations located above ground
  4. Deleted Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 23#Category:Underground rapid transit stations located above ground
William Allen Simpson ( talk) 06:15, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Social critics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering ( talk) 20:49, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: WP:SUBJECTIVECAT, Not a WP:DEFINING characteristic, anyone who has ever criticized interactions between two or more people could be considered a "social critic" - car chasm ( talk) 05:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, not a defining characteristic. Subjects of articles have vaguely in common that they criticized aspects of modern society. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:05, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wikipedians who like video game characters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering ( talk) 20:50, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:USERCAT for lacking any discernible collaborative function - see WP:OC/U#Irrelevant likes. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. Creator may instead consider adding themselves to Category:Wikipedians interested in video games or a subcategory thereof. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:09, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom -- Lenticel ( talk) 12:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - I don't consider categorizing users who "like" anything as meeting the threshold set in WP:USERCAT. If such users wish a collaboration oriented category, they are free to create something with a more encyclopedic naming convention. VegaDark ( talk) 02:05, 1 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians who like PlayStation 2

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering ( talk) 20:51, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:USERCAT for lacking any discernible collaborative function - see WP:UCFD/I#Wikipedians by computer hardware/ WP:UCFD/I#Wikipedians by electronic device. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. Creator may instead consider adding themselves to Category:Wikipedians interested in PlayStation. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:11, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - I don't consider categorizing users who "like" anything as meeting the threshold set in WP:USERCAT. If such users wish to have a collaboration oriented category, they are free to create something with a more encyclopedic naming convention. VegaDark ( talk) 02:06, 1 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians who like Newgrounds

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering ( talk) 20:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:USERCAT for lacking any discernible collaborative function - see WP:UCFD/I#Wikipedians by website. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:32, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wikipedians who like films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering ( talk) 20:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:USERCAT for lacking any discernible collaborative function, would arguable be overly narrow scope even if worded collaboratively as "Wikipedians interested in <film name>. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:32, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. Creator may instead consider adding themselves to Category:Wikipedians interested in film or a subcategory thereof. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:14, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete all - I don't consider categorizing users who "like" anything as meeting the threshold set in WP:USERCAT. If such users wish to have a collaboration oriented category, they are free to create something with a more encyclopedic naming convention. VegaDark ( talk) 02:06, 1 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ancient Rhodian philosophers

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 February 9#Category:Ancient Rhodian philosophers

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_January_31&oldid=1138920561"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< January 30 February 1 >

January 31

Category:Wikipedians interest in energy drink

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering ( talk) 20:44, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:USERCAT for lacking any discernible collaborative function - see WP:UCFD/I#Food, drink, and consumables * Pppery * it has begun... 23:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Founders of philosophical traditions

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering ( talk) 20:45, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: WP:SUBJECTIVECAT, the definition of what constitutes a "founder" or a "philosophical tradition" is so vague that these people will have little in common other than "being very famous" - car chasm ( talk) 23:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Museums in Fort Collins, Colorado

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge Timrollpickering ( talk) 20:46, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. This category contains only 1 entry, as does Category:Museums in Larimer County, Colorado. User:Namiba 23:06, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
It doesn't make sense to merge into another category which is also too small to justify existence.-- User:Namiba 17:23, 1 February 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Feel free to nominate that category for merging too. While it still exists it should be populated though. Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:05, 1 February 2023 (UTC) reply
  • I've added it to this nomination.-- User:Namiba 20:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Philosophical traditions and Category:Philosophical movements

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 21:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: "School" and "tradition" and "movement" are mostly synonymous words that are all used interchangeably. Not a WP:DEFINING characteristic of any one of the three labels. - car chasm ( talk) 20:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect and rename — per Fayenatic london, leave a redirect on the merged categories. Rename the others without redirect.
    William Allen Simpson ( talk) 08:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bronze Age literature

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 February 12#Category:Bronze Age literature

Category:Critics of Marxism

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 February 9#Category:Critics of Marxism

Category:Flavin enzymes and Category:Flavoprotein enzymes to Category:Flavoproteins

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 20:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: The categories are synonyms; the shortest and most established name is Flavoprotein; the word 'enzyme' is a pleonasm. -- TadejM my talk 17:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Support. Flavoprotein is the common term. ― Syn path 07:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ice hockey in Savannah, Georgia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 20:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. Only 2 articles, unlikely to grow. No opposition to recreation w/ growth. User:Namiba 16:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:History of foreign relations of Romania

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge Timrollpickering ( talk) 20:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: same. 寒吉 ( talk) 11:21, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Presocratic philosophical literature

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 February 9#Category:Presocratic philosophical literature

Category:Underground rapid transit stations located above ground in the United States

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete/Merge Timrollpickering ( talk) 20:49, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Very recently created category that does not meet WP:CATDEFINING. While stations can generally be said to be above or below ground, they are not commonly and consistently referred to as such. AFAICT, these were all recently created by a single editor without discussion.
Delete where already categorized by line. Upmerge where the stations are not already in another subcategory.
See recent:
  1. Deleted Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 2#Category:SkyTrain (Vancouver) stations located above ground
  2. Deleted Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 11#Category:Underground rapid transit stations located above ground
  3. Deleted Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 12#Category:Underground rapid transit stations located above ground
  4. Deleted Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 23#Category:Underground rapid transit stations located above ground
William Allen Simpson ( talk) 06:15, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Social critics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering ( talk) 20:49, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: WP:SUBJECTIVECAT, Not a WP:DEFINING characteristic, anyone who has ever criticized interactions between two or more people could be considered a "social critic" - car chasm ( talk) 05:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, not a defining characteristic. Subjects of articles have vaguely in common that they criticized aspects of modern society. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:05, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wikipedians who like video game characters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering ( talk) 20:50, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:USERCAT for lacking any discernible collaborative function - see WP:OC/U#Irrelevant likes. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. Creator may instead consider adding themselves to Category:Wikipedians interested in video games or a subcategory thereof. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:09, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom -- Lenticel ( talk) 12:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - I don't consider categorizing users who "like" anything as meeting the threshold set in WP:USERCAT. If such users wish a collaboration oriented category, they are free to create something with a more encyclopedic naming convention. VegaDark ( talk) 02:05, 1 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians who like PlayStation 2

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering ( talk) 20:51, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:USERCAT for lacking any discernible collaborative function - see WP:UCFD/I#Wikipedians by computer hardware/ WP:UCFD/I#Wikipedians by electronic device. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. Creator may instead consider adding themselves to Category:Wikipedians interested in PlayStation. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:11, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - I don't consider categorizing users who "like" anything as meeting the threshold set in WP:USERCAT. If such users wish to have a collaboration oriented category, they are free to create something with a more encyclopedic naming convention. VegaDark ( talk) 02:06, 1 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians who like Newgrounds

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering ( talk) 20:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:USERCAT for lacking any discernible collaborative function - see WP:UCFD/I#Wikipedians by website. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:32, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wikipedians who like films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering ( talk) 20:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:USERCAT for lacking any discernible collaborative function, would arguable be overly narrow scope even if worded collaboratively as "Wikipedians interested in <film name>. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:32, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. Creator may instead consider adding themselves to Category:Wikipedians interested in film or a subcategory thereof. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:14, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete all - I don't consider categorizing users who "like" anything as meeting the threshold set in WP:USERCAT. If such users wish to have a collaboration oriented category, they are free to create something with a more encyclopedic naming convention. VegaDark ( talk) 02:06, 1 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ancient Rhodian philosophers

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 February 9#Category:Ancient Rhodian philosophers

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_January_31&oldid=1138920561"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE