From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 30

Category:Films featuring Cantonese opera

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:22, 29 June 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: "Featuring" is not defining. ★Trekker ( talk) 08:13, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films featuring feuds

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:22, 29 June 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: "Featuring" is not defining. ★Trekker ( talk) 08:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support I don't really see a difference in meaning here, but "about" may be clearer. Dimadick ( talk) 08:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support in principle but it would be recommendable if someone would check every article manually, to see if the film is really "about" this topic. Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support, with the same caveat as Marcocapelle. If the film merely has a scene with this, it should be in the about category, this needs to be checked on an item by item basis. There is no justification for categories for items merely appearing in the film, that is not being the main subject, as a brief appearance is not defining.-- Mvqr ( talk) 10:23, 31 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films featuring hypnosis

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:22, 29 June 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: "Featuring" is not defining. ★Trekker ( talk) 08:11, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support I don't really see a difference in meaning here, but "about" may be clearer. Dimadick ( talk) 08:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support in principle but it would be recommendable if someone would check every article manually, to see if the film is really "about" this topic. Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support, with the same caveat as Marcocapelle. If the film merely has a scene with this, it should be in the about category, this needs to be checked on an item by item basis. There is no justification for categories for items merely appearing in the film, that is not being the main subject, as a brief appearance is not defining.-- Mvqr ( talk) 10:23, 31 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films featuring limbo dancing

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:23, 29 June 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: SMALLCAT ★Trekker ( talk) 08:11, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films featuring pets

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:24, 29 June 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: "Featuring" is not defining. ★Trekker ( talk) 08:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films featuring puppetry

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 29#Category:Films featuring puppetry

Category:Films featuring Peking opera

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:24, 29 June 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: "Featuring" isn't defining. ★Trekker ( talk) 08:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support I don't really see a difference in meaning here, but "about" may be clearer. Dimadick ( talk) 08:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support in principle but it would be recommendable if someone would check every article manually, to see if the film is really "about" this topic. Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support, with the same caveat as Marcocapelle. If the film merely has a scene with this, it should be in the about category, this needs to be checked on an item by item basis. There is no justification for categories for items merely appearing in the film, that is not being the main subject, as a brief appearance is not defining.-- Mvqr ( talk) 10:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films featuring Sichuan opera

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:25, 29 June 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Per parent category naming scheme, "featuring" is not defining. ★Trekker ( talk) 08:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support I don't really see a difference in meaning here, but "about" may be clearer. Dimadick ( talk) 08:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support, with the same caveat as categories above. If the film merely has a scene with this, it should be in the about category, this needs to be checked on an item by item basis. There is no justification for categories for items merely appearing in the film, that is not being the main subject, as a brief appearance is not defining.-- Mvqr ( talk) 10:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films featuring breakdancing

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 29#Category:Films featuring breakdancing

Category:Films featuring Andy Panda

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 29#Category:Films featuring Andy Panda

Category:Mother and daughter films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Films about mother–daughter relationships. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:26, 29 June 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Not a genre, and not defining for most of these films. If kept should be moved to "Films about mother-daughter relationships". ★Trekker ( talk) 07:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Father and daughter films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Films about father–daughter relationships. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:27, 29 June 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Not a genre, and not defining for most of the films here. If kept should be moved to "Films about father-daughter relationships". ★Trekker ( talk) 07:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Father and son films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Films about father–son relationships. – Fayenatic London 15:14, 12 July 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Not a genre and not a defining topic of most of these films. If kept should be moved to "Films about father-son relationships". ★Trekker ( talk) 07:16, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Rename as suggested by nom, but it would be recommendable if someone would check every article manually, to see if the film is really "about" this topic. Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Comment: I support moving films to "Films about father-and-son relationships", and the same for other categories like mothers-and-sons, father-and-daughters, etc. Marcocapelle Regarding checking each film listed to see if it fits under a particular category, I would say all the films listed appear to have a similar issue to the Breakdancing in film discussion above; i.e. there is some disagreement about whether certain films qualify for a particular category. For instance, a while back I added the film Legends of the Fall to the category of “Father and son films,” as its story concerns three brothers and their father, a plot line which is clearly stated in the article itself. However, another user removed my edit and claimed it was original research (see November 2021 on my talk page). Just thought I’d point out how users don’t always agree on which films fall under what category, even if plot details are stated in the article.
  • Rename per nom Dimadick ( talk) 05:07, 6 June 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as non defining. ―  Qwerfjkl talk 16:28, 29 June 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Rename per nom. DoubleCross ( ) 15:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Mother and son films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Films about mother–son relationships. – Fayenatic London 15:15, 12 July 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Not a genre, not defining for pretty much any of these films. If kept should be moved to "Films about mother-son relationships". ★Trekker ( talk) 07:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:KFC Twenty20 Big Bash

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge for now to Category:Big Bash League; if at a later stage there is clearer consensus that the content here does not belong in the target then it can be removed without the need for a new CfD nomination ( non-admin closure) Marcocapelle ( talk) 05:14, 7 June 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Overcategorization Ten Pound Hammer( What did I screw up now?) 18:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle ( talk) 05:44, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Power Rangers stubs

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 29#Category:Power Rangers stubs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 30

Category:Films featuring Cantonese opera

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:22, 29 June 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: "Featuring" is not defining. ★Trekker ( talk) 08:13, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films featuring feuds

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:22, 29 June 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: "Featuring" is not defining. ★Trekker ( talk) 08:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support I don't really see a difference in meaning here, but "about" may be clearer. Dimadick ( talk) 08:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support in principle but it would be recommendable if someone would check every article manually, to see if the film is really "about" this topic. Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support, with the same caveat as Marcocapelle. If the film merely has a scene with this, it should be in the about category, this needs to be checked on an item by item basis. There is no justification for categories for items merely appearing in the film, that is not being the main subject, as a brief appearance is not defining.-- Mvqr ( talk) 10:23, 31 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films featuring hypnosis

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:22, 29 June 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: "Featuring" is not defining. ★Trekker ( talk) 08:11, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support I don't really see a difference in meaning here, but "about" may be clearer. Dimadick ( talk) 08:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support in principle but it would be recommendable if someone would check every article manually, to see if the film is really "about" this topic. Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support, with the same caveat as Marcocapelle. If the film merely has a scene with this, it should be in the about category, this needs to be checked on an item by item basis. There is no justification for categories for items merely appearing in the film, that is not being the main subject, as a brief appearance is not defining.-- Mvqr ( talk) 10:23, 31 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films featuring limbo dancing

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:23, 29 June 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: SMALLCAT ★Trekker ( talk) 08:11, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films featuring pets

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:24, 29 June 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: "Featuring" is not defining. ★Trekker ( talk) 08:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films featuring puppetry

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 29#Category:Films featuring puppetry

Category:Films featuring Peking opera

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:24, 29 June 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: "Featuring" isn't defining. ★Trekker ( talk) 08:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support I don't really see a difference in meaning here, but "about" may be clearer. Dimadick ( talk) 08:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support in principle but it would be recommendable if someone would check every article manually, to see if the film is really "about" this topic. Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support, with the same caveat as Marcocapelle. If the film merely has a scene with this, it should be in the about category, this needs to be checked on an item by item basis. There is no justification for categories for items merely appearing in the film, that is not being the main subject, as a brief appearance is not defining.-- Mvqr ( talk) 10:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films featuring Sichuan opera

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:25, 29 June 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Per parent category naming scheme, "featuring" is not defining. ★Trekker ( talk) 08:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support I don't really see a difference in meaning here, but "about" may be clearer. Dimadick ( talk) 08:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support, with the same caveat as categories above. If the film merely has a scene with this, it should be in the about category, this needs to be checked on an item by item basis. There is no justification for categories for items merely appearing in the film, that is not being the main subject, as a brief appearance is not defining.-- Mvqr ( talk) 10:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films featuring breakdancing

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 29#Category:Films featuring breakdancing

Category:Films featuring Andy Panda

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 29#Category:Films featuring Andy Panda

Category:Mother and daughter films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Films about mother–daughter relationships. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:26, 29 June 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Not a genre, and not defining for most of these films. If kept should be moved to "Films about mother-daughter relationships". ★Trekker ( talk) 07:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Father and daughter films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Films about father–daughter relationships. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:27, 29 June 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Not a genre, and not defining for most of the films here. If kept should be moved to "Films about father-daughter relationships". ★Trekker ( talk) 07:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Father and son films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Films about father–son relationships. – Fayenatic London 15:14, 12 July 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Not a genre and not a defining topic of most of these films. If kept should be moved to "Films about father-son relationships". ★Trekker ( talk) 07:16, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Rename as suggested by nom, but it would be recommendable if someone would check every article manually, to see if the film is really "about" this topic. Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Comment: I support moving films to "Films about father-and-son relationships", and the same for other categories like mothers-and-sons, father-and-daughters, etc. Marcocapelle Regarding checking each film listed to see if it fits under a particular category, I would say all the films listed appear to have a similar issue to the Breakdancing in film discussion above; i.e. there is some disagreement about whether certain films qualify for a particular category. For instance, a while back I added the film Legends of the Fall to the category of “Father and son films,” as its story concerns three brothers and their father, a plot line which is clearly stated in the article itself. However, another user removed my edit and claimed it was original research (see November 2021 on my talk page). Just thought I’d point out how users don’t always agree on which films fall under what category, even if plot details are stated in the article.
  • Rename per nom Dimadick ( talk) 05:07, 6 June 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as non defining. ―  Qwerfjkl talk 16:28, 29 June 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Rename per nom. DoubleCross ( ) 15:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Mother and son films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Films about mother–son relationships. – Fayenatic London 15:15, 12 July 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Not a genre, not defining for pretty much any of these films. If kept should be moved to "Films about mother-son relationships". ★Trekker ( talk) 07:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:KFC Twenty20 Big Bash

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge for now to Category:Big Bash League; if at a later stage there is clearer consensus that the content here does not belong in the target then it can be removed without the need for a new CfD nomination ( non-admin closure) Marcocapelle ( talk) 05:14, 7 June 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Overcategorization Ten Pound Hammer( What did I screw up now?) 18:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle ( talk) 05:44, 30 May 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Power Rangers stubs

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 29#Category:Power Rangers stubs


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook