From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 13

Category:People of medieval Belgium

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. There is a consensus against outright deletion. Several editors express interest in alternate proposals (e.g. some sort of a merge), but there is no consensus for any specific action at this time. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 22:50, 4 February 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Belgium didnt exist until 1825. These categories needs to be dispersed. Rathfelder ( talk) 20:49, 13 January 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Nobility of the United Kingdom

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 January 21#Category:Nobility of the United Kingdom

Category:Educational psychology instruments

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. I note that since 2016 there has been an alternative set category, Category:Educational evaluation methods. – Fayenatic London 10:24, 3 March 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: The scope is almost impossible to disentangle due to the amount of crossover. Note, instrument here refers to a scientific instrument, a tool for measuring a variable. Xurizuri ( talk) 12:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose - upmerging a set category into a topic category with 196 top-level pages seems a strange idea. "This category includes articles about questionnaires, tests, and other instruments related to educational psychology" seems clear enough. Oculi ( talk) 14:13, 13 January 2022 (UTC) reply
    • Despite that apparent clarity, only 1 of the 5 articles even approaches the definition of an instrument, through being a article about a type of instrument. The category may be defined as a set, but it isn't acting as one. Per my initial reasoning, it also isn't viable as an actual set category. -- Xurizuri ( talk) 16:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support for now, the category currently does not contain any articles that belong in a set category. Admittedly, the content of the parent category looks messy, some further diffusion or purging would probably be helpful. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:East Frisians

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. – Fayenatic London 09:09, 3 March 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: They seem to be the same thing. Category:People from former German states are all in the "from" form. Rathfelder ( talk) 10:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
  1. ^ Van Der Essen, Leon (1925), "Notre nom national", Revue belge de philologie et d'histoire, 4 (1): 121–131, doi: 10.3406/rbph.1925.6335
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 13

Category:People of medieval Belgium

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. There is a consensus against outright deletion. Several editors express interest in alternate proposals (e.g. some sort of a merge), but there is no consensus for any specific action at this time. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 22:50, 4 February 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Belgium didnt exist until 1825. These categories needs to be dispersed. Rathfelder ( talk) 20:49, 13 January 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Nobility of the United Kingdom

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 January 21#Category:Nobility of the United Kingdom

Category:Educational psychology instruments

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. I note that since 2016 there has been an alternative set category, Category:Educational evaluation methods. – Fayenatic London 10:24, 3 March 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: The scope is almost impossible to disentangle due to the amount of crossover. Note, instrument here refers to a scientific instrument, a tool for measuring a variable. Xurizuri ( talk) 12:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose - upmerging a set category into a topic category with 196 top-level pages seems a strange idea. "This category includes articles about questionnaires, tests, and other instruments related to educational psychology" seems clear enough. Oculi ( talk) 14:13, 13 January 2022 (UTC) reply
    • Despite that apparent clarity, only 1 of the 5 articles even approaches the definition of an instrument, through being a article about a type of instrument. The category may be defined as a set, but it isn't acting as one. Per my initial reasoning, it also isn't viable as an actual set category. -- Xurizuri ( talk) 16:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support for now, the category currently does not contain any articles that belong in a set category. Admittedly, the content of the parent category looks messy, some further diffusion or purging would probably be helpful. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:East Frisians

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. – Fayenatic London 09:09, 3 March 2022 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: They seem to be the same thing. Category:People from former German states are all in the "from" form. Rathfelder ( talk) 10:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
  1. ^ Van Der Essen, Leon (1925), "Notre nom national", Revue belge de philologie et d'histoire, 4 (1): 121–131, doi: 10.3406/rbph.1925.6335

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook