The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Personally I feel like that the Award-winning video games category should be merged with Video game award winners because they basically describe the same thing and it feels unnecessary to have two separate categories as a result.
Nice Stories (
talk) 23:57, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep, one category is for articles about video games, the other is for biographies. By all means leave a "see also" note on both pages.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:27, 10 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - the first is for games (any people should be removed from it), the 2nd for people (any games should be removed from it).
Oculi (
talk) 16:46, 11 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Tunisian Roman Catholic archbishops
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: There are no Tunisian nationals who are RC archbishops. Of the two past archbishops, one was Italian and the other Jordanian.
Laurel Lodged (
talk) 19:49, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment Yes, this category has been emptied. LizRead!Talk! 21:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Members of the American Physical Society
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete, mere membership is hardly ever defining.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:29, 10 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete -- Mere membership of a learned society is not defining.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 15:31, 10 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete A more novel and interesting category would be American physicists who AREN'T members of APS, since membership is basically de rigeur.PianoDan (
talk) 19:00, 10 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Wikipedians who use AniList
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:11th-century Frankish bishops
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, the Franks were the founders of the
Merovingian Kingdom and the
Carolingian Empire but in the 11th century the term "Franks" in this meaning has become obsolete. The term was still used for people from the
Duchy of Franconia but that is clearly not what this category is intended for. The category mainly contains bishops in the Low Lands, which was part of the Holy Roman Empire in this period.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 12:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Support -- However the parent is People of Carolingian Empire, so that more tidying is needed.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 15:36, 10 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The proposal is to not merge to this other parent anyway, so this is not a problem.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 18:35, 10 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: rename per
WP:SMALLCAT, only 1-3 articles in every of these categories. (The categories have not been tagged yet.)Marcocapelle (
talk) 08:12, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The current name suggests that this cat would contain every requested edit on the project, despite it not containing any other edit requests like the semi-protected, fully-protected, etc. ones. This category only consists of COI and partial-block edit requests. Be more specific about what this category is about. The proposed names are in line with other requested edit cats like
Category:Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests. —CX Zoom[he/him](
let's talk •
C •
L) 05:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Question, would it make sense to split the category (1 template = 1 category)?
Marcocapelle (
talk) 15:32, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Agreed, it would make sense to Split since the skills required for answering the two kinds of requests have basically no overlap. If they are not split, rename per nom.
* Pppery *it has begun... 16:22, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Split per others. We already divide the protected requests from this category Happy Editing--IAmChaos 19:37, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Split: Partial block edit requests are not the same as COI requests. While I don't have a strong opinion, "partially-blocked" sounds better to me. If it is not split, non's rename will clarify things.
DarthFlappy 16:09, 19 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Personally I feel like that the Award-winning video games category should be merged with Video game award winners because they basically describe the same thing and it feels unnecessary to have two separate categories as a result.
Nice Stories (
talk) 23:57, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep, one category is for articles about video games, the other is for biographies. By all means leave a "see also" note on both pages.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:27, 10 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - the first is for games (any people should be removed from it), the 2nd for people (any games should be removed from it).
Oculi (
talk) 16:46, 11 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Tunisian Roman Catholic archbishops
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: There are no Tunisian nationals who are RC archbishops. Of the two past archbishops, one was Italian and the other Jordanian.
Laurel Lodged (
talk) 19:49, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment Yes, this category has been emptied. LizRead!Talk! 21:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Members of the American Physical Society
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete, mere membership is hardly ever defining.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:29, 10 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete -- Mere membership of a learned society is not defining.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 15:31, 10 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete A more novel and interesting category would be American physicists who AREN'T members of APS, since membership is basically de rigeur.PianoDan (
talk) 19:00, 10 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Wikipedians who use AniList
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:11th-century Frankish bishops
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, the Franks were the founders of the
Merovingian Kingdom and the
Carolingian Empire but in the 11th century the term "Franks" in this meaning has become obsolete. The term was still used for people from the
Duchy of Franconia but that is clearly not what this category is intended for. The category mainly contains bishops in the Low Lands, which was part of the Holy Roman Empire in this period.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 12:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Support -- However the parent is People of Carolingian Empire, so that more tidying is needed.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 15:36, 10 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The proposal is to not merge to this other parent anyway, so this is not a problem.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 18:35, 10 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: rename per
WP:SMALLCAT, only 1-3 articles in every of these categories. (The categories have not been tagged yet.)Marcocapelle (
talk) 08:12, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The current name suggests that this cat would contain every requested edit on the project, despite it not containing any other edit requests like the semi-protected, fully-protected, etc. ones. This category only consists of COI and partial-block edit requests. Be more specific about what this category is about. The proposed names are in line with other requested edit cats like
Category:Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests. —CX Zoom[he/him](
let's talk •
C •
L) 05:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Question, would it make sense to split the category (1 template = 1 category)?
Marcocapelle (
talk) 15:32, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Agreed, it would make sense to Split since the skills required for answering the two kinds of requests have basically no overlap. If they are not split, rename per nom.
* Pppery *it has begun... 16:22, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Split per others. We already divide the protected requests from this category Happy Editing--IAmChaos 19:37, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Split: Partial block edit requests are not the same as COI requests. While I don't have a strong opinion, "partially-blocked" sounds better to me. If it is not split, non's rename will clarify things.
DarthFlappy 16:09, 19 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.