The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment, the header of
Category:Songs by artist says "Please note that all song articles should have subcategories here, regardless of how many songs the artist has recorded." It does not explicitly mention whether that also applies for redlinked artists.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
07:03, 14 May 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Marcocapelle: Thanks for your comment, my nomination is not based on whether there is an article for the band, but whether the category is any use for navigation. If there had been two members of any description I would not have nominated, if somebody wants to create an article for the artist, I am fine with that too, but click on a category to find it is a dead end does seem to be against the spirit of categories. --
Richhoncho (
talk)
07:59, 19 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Rede Globo affiliates
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Rede Globo
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Esuvii
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Another category (cf.
20 March 2020,
6 December 2020) which mixes up a supposed Roman family/gens with an obscure tribe of Gauls. It may or may not be a coincidence that the two Romans listed here, both called Esuvius Tetricus, were also from Gaul (were they named after the Gallic tribe?), but, in any case, the Romans and the Gauls would have to be split into two separate categories. And there's not enough of either to form one which would not fall under
WP:SMALLCAT.
Avilich (
talk)
13:37, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets councillors
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets was a short-lived party and has now dissolved. It had 6 councillors during its existence, but only 1 of these has ever been notable and in possession of an article.
Bondegezou (
talk)
11:30, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Leaders of People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets was a short-lived party that only had one leader in its existence and has now dissolved, so there's no point in having a category.
Bondegezou (
talk)
11:27, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Honorary Degree Recipients of Fu Jen Catholic University
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Nondefining award. Not mentioned in three bios checked at random. Honorary degrees don't seem to be defining, hardly ever. (
t ·
c) buidhe07:10, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete In an American context, honorary degrees are throw-away pieces of paper given in exchange for lowering the cost of commencement speakers to lower the price of their speaking fees. It's hard t say what this award is for since the articles generally don't mention it which clearly fails
WP:OCAWARD. -
RevelationDirect (
talk)
11:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Summiters of Mount Kinabalu
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Geisler family(Philippines)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Strongly Oppose A global Cat: Geisler family is not at all empirically meaningful. Geisler is not a very rare family name in Germany/Austria or even emigrants. Mishmash probable! But nevertheless it should be renamed to
Category:Geisler family (Philippines) to deliver correct grammar. --
Just N. (
talk)
09:30, 9 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete 3 people do not categorize a large enough family to be worth having a category for. Family categories have too often sprung up without any good sourcing to justify having them.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
13:12, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Enrile family(Philippines)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose Apart from not knowing global frequency of Spanish surname Enrile just the same objections as with Geisler above. The wrong grammar (missing space) should be corrected. --
Just N. (
talk)
09:33, 9 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Cimbalomists by nationality and 1 subcategory
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This is the "national order of diplomatic merit of the Republic of the Philippines... [awarded to] diplomats, officials and nationals of foreign states"—i.e. it's mostly a diplomatic souvenir. Although it's also awarded to Filipino diplomats, none of the articles I checked more than mentioned the award. (
t ·
c) buidhe03:23, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. Appears to be a state honour frequently awarded to Filipino citizens for services to the Philippines. Clerarly defining to them. --
Necrothesp (
talk)
09:42, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete This is not an honor that is so major that it would be mentioned in any short bio blurd on the person. That is the super limited rule under which we allow such categories. It is not met.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
13:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Honorary Commanders of the Order of the Defender of the Realm
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The honorary version of this award is a Malaysian diplomatic souvenir. Nominating separately from the substantive award as while I don't expect it is defining either, it should be easier to get consensus for this deletion. (
t ·
c) buidhe03:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Members of COVID-19 advisory groups
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete all, it is relevant right now because Covid is a "thing", but in a few years time it may become too minor to even mention in a biography. Sort of PERFCAT too. If kept, rename.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
05:53, 7 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose We are an encyclopedia and provide useful services to people of today by navigatonal categories. If in future years those national commetees are forgettable then we should delete them at hat moment but not now. I'd suppose users work with that as long they are still in office. --
Just N. (
talk)
22:46, 8 May 2021 (UTC).reply
It is not clear what is being asked here. I would however suggest that all categories should specify country (unless that are emanations of WHO or some other international body. I see no objection to having categories for government advisory bodies and one parent (or a tree of them).
Peterkingiron (
talk)
15:05, 16 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete all It is not worth categorizing people by various short term task forces they served on. In the broad scheme of things this is just not notable enough to categorize biographical articles by.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
12:17, 2 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Unless these groups last a long time and so have lots of members I think the lists in the articles should be sufficient.
Rathfelder (
talk)
19:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete -- This relates to a self-appointed group who came together to oppose (or criticise) what the government SAGE committee was doing. I have not herd them mentioned on the news for many months. I would therefore suggest that this is a NN committee, even if it still exists (does it?). I am not objecting to the existence of an article, but the category comes close to being a PERFCAT.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
15:02, 16 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Recipients of the Order of Abdulaziz al Saud
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Nondefining Saudi award. On both arwiki and enwiki, awarded primarily to Al Saud family and foreign dignitaries. These people are notable for their position, not receiving this award. (
t ·
c) buidhe03:06, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Honorary Degree Recipients of the University of London
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete It's not clear why this award is given in the articles which suggests it's a non-defining award for people with only a passing connection to the school. -
RevelationDirect (
talk)
11:03, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Recipients of the Order of the Star of Jordan
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Mostly awarded to foreign dignitaries, to members of the Jordanian royal family, and to high-ranking Jordanian politicians (such as the prime minister). Either way, recipients are notable for their position not for receiving this award. I checked arwiki and it tells the same story. (
t ·
c) buidhe01:58, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. Appears to be a state honour frequently awarded to Jordanian citizens for services to Jordan. Clerarly defining to them. --
Necrothesp (
talk)
09:41, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete as applied has clearly created huge amounts of category clutter. This award is not defining to anyone in a way that no having the category would harm navigation.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
13:17, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Members of the Boston Club
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Despite its name,
The Boston Club is a private gentlemen's club in New Orleans, Louisiana. It does carry some old money prestige but it tends to admit prominent people who are not defined by it. Of the 10 articles in this category, 7 don't mention this at all and 3 mention it in passing (
1,
2,
3) but each of those were officers or founders not just members. The category contents are already listified right
here in the main article for any reader interested in the topic. -
RevelationDirect (
talk)
00:03, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Former member states of the European Union
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support - per above. Can be recreated in the future if a substantial amount of countries leave the E.U., but for now that looks unlikely.
Inter&anthro (
talk)
01:02, 7 May 2021 (UTC)reply
I just meant there are no other Wikipedia articles that could be added right now; if the situation changes on the ground we can of course re-evaluate this category. -
RevelationDirect (
talk)
01:25, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment, the header of
Category:Songs by artist says "Please note that all song articles should have subcategories here, regardless of how many songs the artist has recorded." It does not explicitly mention whether that also applies for redlinked artists.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
07:03, 14 May 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Marcocapelle: Thanks for your comment, my nomination is not based on whether there is an article for the band, but whether the category is any use for navigation. If there had been two members of any description I would not have nominated, if somebody wants to create an article for the artist, I am fine with that too, but click on a category to find it is a dead end does seem to be against the spirit of categories. --
Richhoncho (
talk)
07:59, 19 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Rede Globo affiliates
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Rede Globo
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Esuvii
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Another category (cf.
20 March 2020,
6 December 2020) which mixes up a supposed Roman family/gens with an obscure tribe of Gauls. It may or may not be a coincidence that the two Romans listed here, both called Esuvius Tetricus, were also from Gaul (were they named after the Gallic tribe?), but, in any case, the Romans and the Gauls would have to be split into two separate categories. And there's not enough of either to form one which would not fall under
WP:SMALLCAT.
Avilich (
talk)
13:37, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets councillors
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets was a short-lived party and has now dissolved. It had 6 councillors during its existence, but only 1 of these has ever been notable and in possession of an article.
Bondegezou (
talk)
11:30, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Leaders of People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets was a short-lived party that only had one leader in its existence and has now dissolved, so there's no point in having a category.
Bondegezou (
talk)
11:27, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Honorary Degree Recipients of Fu Jen Catholic University
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Nondefining award. Not mentioned in three bios checked at random. Honorary degrees don't seem to be defining, hardly ever. (
t ·
c) buidhe07:10, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete In an American context, honorary degrees are throw-away pieces of paper given in exchange for lowering the cost of commencement speakers to lower the price of their speaking fees. It's hard t say what this award is for since the articles generally don't mention it which clearly fails
WP:OCAWARD. -
RevelationDirect (
talk)
11:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Summiters of Mount Kinabalu
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Geisler family(Philippines)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Strongly Oppose A global Cat: Geisler family is not at all empirically meaningful. Geisler is not a very rare family name in Germany/Austria or even emigrants. Mishmash probable! But nevertheless it should be renamed to
Category:Geisler family (Philippines) to deliver correct grammar. --
Just N. (
talk)
09:30, 9 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete 3 people do not categorize a large enough family to be worth having a category for. Family categories have too often sprung up without any good sourcing to justify having them.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
13:12, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Enrile family(Philippines)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose Apart from not knowing global frequency of Spanish surname Enrile just the same objections as with Geisler above. The wrong grammar (missing space) should be corrected. --
Just N. (
talk)
09:33, 9 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Cimbalomists by nationality and 1 subcategory
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This is the "national order of diplomatic merit of the Republic of the Philippines... [awarded to] diplomats, officials and nationals of foreign states"—i.e. it's mostly a diplomatic souvenir. Although it's also awarded to Filipino diplomats, none of the articles I checked more than mentioned the award. (
t ·
c) buidhe03:23, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. Appears to be a state honour frequently awarded to Filipino citizens for services to the Philippines. Clerarly defining to them. --
Necrothesp (
talk)
09:42, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete This is not an honor that is so major that it would be mentioned in any short bio blurd on the person. That is the super limited rule under which we allow such categories. It is not met.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
13:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Honorary Commanders of the Order of the Defender of the Realm
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The honorary version of this award is a Malaysian diplomatic souvenir. Nominating separately from the substantive award as while I don't expect it is defining either, it should be easier to get consensus for this deletion. (
t ·
c) buidhe03:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Members of COVID-19 advisory groups
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete all, it is relevant right now because Covid is a "thing", but in a few years time it may become too minor to even mention in a biography. Sort of PERFCAT too. If kept, rename.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
05:53, 7 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose We are an encyclopedia and provide useful services to people of today by navigatonal categories. If in future years those national commetees are forgettable then we should delete them at hat moment but not now. I'd suppose users work with that as long they are still in office. --
Just N. (
talk)
22:46, 8 May 2021 (UTC).reply
It is not clear what is being asked here. I would however suggest that all categories should specify country (unless that are emanations of WHO or some other international body. I see no objection to having categories for government advisory bodies and one parent (or a tree of them).
Peterkingiron (
talk)
15:05, 16 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete all It is not worth categorizing people by various short term task forces they served on. In the broad scheme of things this is just not notable enough to categorize biographical articles by.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
12:17, 2 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Unless these groups last a long time and so have lots of members I think the lists in the articles should be sufficient.
Rathfelder (
talk)
19:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete -- This relates to a self-appointed group who came together to oppose (or criticise) what the government SAGE committee was doing. I have not herd them mentioned on the news for many months. I would therefore suggest that this is a NN committee, even if it still exists (does it?). I am not objecting to the existence of an article, but the category comes close to being a PERFCAT.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
15:02, 16 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Recipients of the Order of Abdulaziz al Saud
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Nondefining Saudi award. On both arwiki and enwiki, awarded primarily to Al Saud family and foreign dignitaries. These people are notable for their position, not receiving this award. (
t ·
c) buidhe03:06, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Honorary Degree Recipients of the University of London
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete It's not clear why this award is given in the articles which suggests it's a non-defining award for people with only a passing connection to the school. -
RevelationDirect (
talk)
11:03, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Recipients of the Order of the Star of Jordan
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Mostly awarded to foreign dignitaries, to members of the Jordanian royal family, and to high-ranking Jordanian politicians (such as the prime minister). Either way, recipients are notable for their position not for receiving this award. I checked arwiki and it tells the same story. (
t ·
c) buidhe01:58, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. Appears to be a state honour frequently awarded to Jordanian citizens for services to Jordan. Clerarly defining to them. --
Necrothesp (
talk)
09:41, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete as applied has clearly created huge amounts of category clutter. This award is not defining to anyone in a way that no having the category would harm navigation.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
13:17, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Members of the Boston Club
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Despite its name,
The Boston Club is a private gentlemen's club in New Orleans, Louisiana. It does carry some old money prestige but it tends to admit prominent people who are not defined by it. Of the 10 articles in this category, 7 don't mention this at all and 3 mention it in passing (
1,
2,
3) but each of those were officers or founders not just members. The category contents are already listified right
here in the main article for any reader interested in the topic. -
RevelationDirect (
talk)
00:03, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Former member states of the European Union
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support - per above. Can be recreated in the future if a substantial amount of countries leave the E.U., but for now that looks unlikely.
Inter&anthro (
talk)
01:02, 7 May 2021 (UTC)reply
I just meant there are no other Wikipedia articles that could be added right now; if the situation changes on the ground we can of course re-evaluate this category. -
RevelationDirect (
talk)
01:25, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.