Category:Television series set in the 5th millennium
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:WP:SMALLCAT, only article is
Wayward Pines and I don't think there are any more TV series in the target category. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 23:43, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Merge per nom and SMALLCAT. --
Just N. (
talk) 15:24, 27 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:10th millennium
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete per nom and SMALLCAT. --
Just N. (
talk) 15:28, 27 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Biographical films about Presidents of Brazil
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename. –
FayenaticLondon 07:38, 21 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Support - per nom. The earlier ones this week are as yet unopposed.
Oculi (
talk) 20:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment: The last three should probably have the the dropped, e.g. Lists relating to prime ministers of India, though I rather question whether these are appropriate categorisations. As an aside, Lists related to the Prime Minister of India wouldn't be incorrect if it covered items such as Official residences of the Prime Minister of India, but that is not the case. --
Paul_012 (
talk) 12:51, 21 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Good catch, the last three should have the dropped.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 15:12, 21 July 2021 (UTC)reply
I've modified the proposal to remove the "the"s. --
Woko Sapien (
talk) 21:35, 23 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Support - per nom. --
Just N. (
talk) 15:31, 27 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Disney+ series ID same as Wikidata
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge the two and rename (note that both categories are empty while closing the discussion) (
non-admin closure)
Marcocapelle (
talk) 17:43, 28 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Merge and rename the category to
Category:Disney+ ID same as Wikidata, while there are two different templates, having two different tracking categories for 1 wikidata property seems redundant with the low number of transclusions these templates have combined. {{Wikidata tracking category}} can be set to note the two different templates using the same category.
Terasail[✉️] 16:45, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Merge per nom. --
Just N. (
talk) 15:34, 27 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Coptic emigrants
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge. –
FayenaticLondon 17:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Nominator rationale We categorize people by the country they emigrated from and where their destination was. We avoid sub-dividing such categories by ethnicity in most cases. There is no good reason to do so in this case.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 19:22, 29 June 2021 (UTC)reply
It seems to me that all people who belong to the
Coptic Americans should be kept together in a category (even if "descent" is not a fully appropriate name).
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:39, 30 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: adding sibling categories
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
FayenaticLondon 16:10, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Support all per above discussion. Note that this is my second vote.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 16:22, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Lynching of Black men accused of assaulting White women
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete for different reasons. This was the dominant rationale for lynching, and race/sex was central to the narrative. But including accusations in the category name (which by definition are extra-judicial killings not court findings) might unintentionally validate those racist claims. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 17:36, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
I would have said disperse to individual state categories, but gather that is unnecessary.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 11:19, 24 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete This is way too narrow of a category. Especially since the very nature of lynchings often meant that it was less than clear in some cases what the victim was actually accused of, and we also at times deal with after the fact disputes of what the accused was accused of.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 19:42, 29 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete The manner of death is defining, the cause of the killing seems irrelevant.
Dimadick (
talk) 21:24, 6 August 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Sadaka SC players
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions.
GiantSnowman 16:50, 21 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Rename per nom. --
Just N. (
talk) 15:38, 27 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:German Army personnel of World War II
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:keep. bibliomaniac15 05:32, 22 August 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Lettler: the question really is whether we have articles of soldiers or officers who served between 1935 and 1939 only. If there aren't any such articles, the 1935–1945 categories would be redundant and the WWII categories would suffice.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Lettler: these aren't particularly good examples because all three participated in World War II.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:41, 23 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment -- Hitler came to power in 1931, not 1935. Suggest we have a target for
Category:German military personnel of Third Reich, which can be divided in Luftwaffe, Kreigsmarine, Army and SS (which I think had a separate command structure).
Peterkingiron (
talk) 21:38, 23 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The reason for 1935 in the name of the target is that Hitler re-established the German army in 1935. I have no objection to renaming the target to
Category:German military personnel of Third Reich but it does require a separate nomination.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose If someone started in the army in 1935 and left before 1939 they would have not served in WWII, so these are not the same.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 13:01, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply
It seems pretty unlikely that anyone is notable because they joined the army in 1935 and left before the war started.
Rathfelder (
talk) 16:22, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply
They may be notable for other reasons. I would probably support deletion or manually merging of
Category:German Army (1935–1945) personnel and subcategories as very overlapping with WWII categories but that would require a different nomination.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 06:59, 31 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose It is not unusual for someone to have left service or died before 1939.
Dimadick (
talk) 21:22, 6 August 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Cowboy culture
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Rename to title of category's main article as the cowboy is only one aspect of the whole culture or lifestyle which includes Native Americans, gunfighters, homesteaders, US Marshals, US Cavalry, wagon trains, railroads, etc.
No Great Shaker (
talk) 06:22, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Nomination withdrawn – please close. Actually this category is appropriate to the cowboy only; other aspects are or will be categorised elsewhere.
No Great Shaker (
talk) 07:00, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Romanian people convicted of the international crime of aggression
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:WP:SMALLCAT, only 2 entries. Notably, the proposed merge target contains only a subcat layer by nationality. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 06:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Merge for Now With no objection to recreating later if the article count grows. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 18:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Television series set in the 5th millennium
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:WP:SMALLCAT, only article is
Wayward Pines and I don't think there are any more TV series in the target category. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 23:43, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Merge per nom and SMALLCAT. --
Just N. (
talk) 15:24, 27 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:10th millennium
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete per nom and SMALLCAT. --
Just N. (
talk) 15:28, 27 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Biographical films about Presidents of Brazil
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename. –
FayenaticLondon 07:38, 21 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Support - per nom. The earlier ones this week are as yet unopposed.
Oculi (
talk) 20:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment: The last three should probably have the the dropped, e.g. Lists relating to prime ministers of India, though I rather question whether these are appropriate categorisations. As an aside, Lists related to the Prime Minister of India wouldn't be incorrect if it covered items such as Official residences of the Prime Minister of India, but that is not the case. --
Paul_012 (
talk) 12:51, 21 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Good catch, the last three should have the dropped.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 15:12, 21 July 2021 (UTC)reply
I've modified the proposal to remove the "the"s. --
Woko Sapien (
talk) 21:35, 23 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Support - per nom. --
Just N. (
talk) 15:31, 27 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Disney+ series ID same as Wikidata
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge the two and rename (note that both categories are empty while closing the discussion) (
non-admin closure)
Marcocapelle (
talk) 17:43, 28 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Merge and rename the category to
Category:Disney+ ID same as Wikidata, while there are two different templates, having two different tracking categories for 1 wikidata property seems redundant with the low number of transclusions these templates have combined. {{Wikidata tracking category}} can be set to note the two different templates using the same category.
Terasail[✉️] 16:45, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Merge per nom. --
Just N. (
talk) 15:34, 27 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Coptic emigrants
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge. –
FayenaticLondon 17:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Nominator rationale We categorize people by the country they emigrated from and where their destination was. We avoid sub-dividing such categories by ethnicity in most cases. There is no good reason to do so in this case.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 19:22, 29 June 2021 (UTC)reply
It seems to me that all people who belong to the
Coptic Americans should be kept together in a category (even if "descent" is not a fully appropriate name).
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:39, 30 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: adding sibling categories
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
FayenaticLondon 16:10, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Support all per above discussion. Note that this is my second vote.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 16:22, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Lynching of Black men accused of assaulting White women
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete for different reasons. This was the dominant rationale for lynching, and race/sex was central to the narrative. But including accusations in the category name (which by definition are extra-judicial killings not court findings) might unintentionally validate those racist claims. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 17:36, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
I would have said disperse to individual state categories, but gather that is unnecessary.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 11:19, 24 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete This is way too narrow of a category. Especially since the very nature of lynchings often meant that it was less than clear in some cases what the victim was actually accused of, and we also at times deal with after the fact disputes of what the accused was accused of.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 19:42, 29 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete The manner of death is defining, the cause of the killing seems irrelevant.
Dimadick (
talk) 21:24, 6 August 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Sadaka SC players
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions.
GiantSnowman 16:50, 21 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Rename per nom. --
Just N. (
talk) 15:38, 27 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:German Army personnel of World War II
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:keep. bibliomaniac15 05:32, 22 August 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Lettler: the question really is whether we have articles of soldiers or officers who served between 1935 and 1939 only. If there aren't any such articles, the 1935–1945 categories would be redundant and the WWII categories would suffice.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Lettler: these aren't particularly good examples because all three participated in World War II.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:41, 23 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment -- Hitler came to power in 1931, not 1935. Suggest we have a target for
Category:German military personnel of Third Reich, which can be divided in Luftwaffe, Kreigsmarine, Army and SS (which I think had a separate command structure).
Peterkingiron (
talk) 21:38, 23 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The reason for 1935 in the name of the target is that Hitler re-established the German army in 1935. I have no objection to renaming the target to
Category:German military personnel of Third Reich but it does require a separate nomination.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose If someone started in the army in 1935 and left before 1939 they would have not served in WWII, so these are not the same.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 13:01, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply
It seems pretty unlikely that anyone is notable because they joined the army in 1935 and left before the war started.
Rathfelder (
talk) 16:22, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply
They may be notable for other reasons. I would probably support deletion or manually merging of
Category:German Army (1935–1945) personnel and subcategories as very overlapping with WWII categories but that would require a different nomination.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 06:59, 31 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose It is not unusual for someone to have left service or died before 1939.
Dimadick (
talk) 21:22, 6 August 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Cowboy culture
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Rename to title of category's main article as the cowboy is only one aspect of the whole culture or lifestyle which includes Native Americans, gunfighters, homesteaders, US Marshals, US Cavalry, wagon trains, railroads, etc.
No Great Shaker (
talk) 06:22, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Nomination withdrawn – please close. Actually this category is appropriate to the cowboy only; other aspects are or will be categorised elsewhere.
No Great Shaker (
talk) 07:00, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Romanian people convicted of the international crime of aggression
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:WP:SMALLCAT, only 2 entries. Notably, the proposed merge target contains only a subcat layer by nationality. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 06:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Merge for Now With no objection to recreating later if the article count grows. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 18:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.