The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Merge per nom; we've settled on "from" and presumably anyone born somewhere is "from" there (regardless of how transitory one's stay there may be).
Carlossuarez46 (
talk)
00:28, 17 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Women architects who own/owned a firm
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete both, as BrownHairedGirl says, these are 'fuzzy' to say the least, an obscure intersection of 'women'. 'archiects' and 'company owner' (does ths mean director, shareholder, sole owner...?).
Sionk (
talk)
21:28, 13 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:LGBT nurses
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:OCEGRS: This is a seemingly arbitrary combination. LGBT status has no bearing on working as a nurse or vice versa. Cheers,
gnu5720:32, 11 March 2020 (UTC)reply
"Dedicated group-subject subcategories, such as
Category:LGBT writers or
Category:African-American musicians, should be created only where that combination is itself recognized as a distinct and unique cultural topic in its own right. If a substantial and encyclopedic head article (not just a list) cannot be written for such a category, then the category should not be created. Please note that this does not mean that the head article must already exist before a category can be created, but that it must at least be possible to create one."
There are plenty of gay male nurses, at least in England, but its not defining and I've never seen any public discussion of it. I dont think it meets the test.
Rathfelder (
talk)
18:57, 16 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:American LGBT-related animated web series
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Note that my nomination statement expressly said "Note that the articles should also be upmerged to those parent categories", which means deleting this would not remove this from any categories.
Bearcat (
talk)
21:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Dungeons & Dragons planes of existence
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Only two articles. The categories aren't actually particularly relevant because they're general categories on the campaign settings of D&D rather than lists of locations. The "Dungeons & Dragons extraplanar creatures" wouldn't be relevant to the locations either. Also upmerge to "Fictional dimensions."
TTN (
talk)
18:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:2019–20 coronavirus outbreak by continent
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I would close this right now as uncontroversial move and have already done some of the edits as most of the categories were tagged as a redirect. But running out of time now. Will carry on tomorow, unless someone else closes.
Agathoclea (
talk)
21:11, 11 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Harare Polytechnic alumni
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment I have informed the editor who created the category Alumni of Harare Polytechnic by writing an appropriate comment on their talk page in case they may want to add to this discussion.
Coyets (
talk)
09:07, 14 March 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Laurel Lodged offers no reason for making Harare Polytechnic an exception to the naming convention used in
Category:Alumni by university or college in Zimbabwe. If LL or any other editor wants to change the naming convention for alumni in a particular country, then they should do a group nomination for all alumni categories in the country .... and explain why Zimbabwe should be an exception to the rest of Africa.
I'd be grateful to BHG if she could clarify the terms of her personal accusation: please specify which convention am I trying to break, the Indian convention, the American convention or the UK/Irish convention? Having done that, it would be useful for this and other discussions if BHG could go on to explain why the convention that is about to be broken has claims to universal standards, as opposed to local usage. Lastly, having identified the universal wiki standard convention, what proposals does BHG advance for remedying the non conforming tree structures?
Laurel Lodged (
talk)
13:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Fiction set in years and decades of the 10th century
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:SMALLCAT: small, with little or potential for growth.
These are the only by-year and by-decade categories in each of their sets for periods before 1000 AD. That is the usual cut-off point for by-year and by-decade categories, and I don't see any reason to make fictional settings an exception.
Note that I spotted these when I converted the fiction category header templates to a parameterless format. This caused {{Fiction set in year category}} and {{Fiction set in year category}} to break on these categories, because the templates expect a 4-digit year/decade. I could modify the templates to accept 3-digit years/decades (albeit at the cost of some added complexity), but it seems to me that a better solution is to follow the principle adopted at numerous CFDs over the last few years (mostly proposed by @
Marcocapelle) to avoid a collection of
WP:SMALLCATs for these early periods, by consolidating the entries into by-century categories. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs)
12:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Note to closer: If the consensus is to keep either by-year or by-decade categories, please notify me. I will then modify the category header templates to support 3-digit years. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs)
12:03, 11 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:BTS (band)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Merge per nom; we've settled on "from" and presumably anyone born somewhere is "from" there (regardless of how transitory one's stay there may be).
Carlossuarez46 (
talk)
00:28, 17 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Women architects who own/owned a firm
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete both, as BrownHairedGirl says, these are 'fuzzy' to say the least, an obscure intersection of 'women'. 'archiects' and 'company owner' (does ths mean director, shareholder, sole owner...?).
Sionk (
talk)
21:28, 13 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:LGBT nurses
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:OCEGRS: This is a seemingly arbitrary combination. LGBT status has no bearing on working as a nurse or vice versa. Cheers,
gnu5720:32, 11 March 2020 (UTC)reply
"Dedicated group-subject subcategories, such as
Category:LGBT writers or
Category:African-American musicians, should be created only where that combination is itself recognized as a distinct and unique cultural topic in its own right. If a substantial and encyclopedic head article (not just a list) cannot be written for such a category, then the category should not be created. Please note that this does not mean that the head article must already exist before a category can be created, but that it must at least be possible to create one."
There are plenty of gay male nurses, at least in England, but its not defining and I've never seen any public discussion of it. I dont think it meets the test.
Rathfelder (
talk)
18:57, 16 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:American LGBT-related animated web series
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Note that my nomination statement expressly said "Note that the articles should also be upmerged to those parent categories", which means deleting this would not remove this from any categories.
Bearcat (
talk)
21:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Dungeons & Dragons planes of existence
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Only two articles. The categories aren't actually particularly relevant because they're general categories on the campaign settings of D&D rather than lists of locations. The "Dungeons & Dragons extraplanar creatures" wouldn't be relevant to the locations either. Also upmerge to "Fictional dimensions."
TTN (
talk)
18:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:2019–20 coronavirus outbreak by continent
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I would close this right now as uncontroversial move and have already done some of the edits as most of the categories were tagged as a redirect. But running out of time now. Will carry on tomorow, unless someone else closes.
Agathoclea (
talk)
21:11, 11 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Harare Polytechnic alumni
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment I have informed the editor who created the category Alumni of Harare Polytechnic by writing an appropriate comment on their talk page in case they may want to add to this discussion.
Coyets (
talk)
09:07, 14 March 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Laurel Lodged offers no reason for making Harare Polytechnic an exception to the naming convention used in
Category:Alumni by university or college in Zimbabwe. If LL or any other editor wants to change the naming convention for alumni in a particular country, then they should do a group nomination for all alumni categories in the country .... and explain why Zimbabwe should be an exception to the rest of Africa.
I'd be grateful to BHG if she could clarify the terms of her personal accusation: please specify which convention am I trying to break, the Indian convention, the American convention or the UK/Irish convention? Having done that, it would be useful for this and other discussions if BHG could go on to explain why the convention that is about to be broken has claims to universal standards, as opposed to local usage. Lastly, having identified the universal wiki standard convention, what proposals does BHG advance for remedying the non conforming tree structures?
Laurel Lodged (
talk)
13:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Fiction set in years and decades of the 10th century
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:SMALLCAT: small, with little or potential for growth.
These are the only by-year and by-decade categories in each of their sets for periods before 1000 AD. That is the usual cut-off point for by-year and by-decade categories, and I don't see any reason to make fictional settings an exception.
Note that I spotted these when I converted the fiction category header templates to a parameterless format. This caused {{Fiction set in year category}} and {{Fiction set in year category}} to break on these categories, because the templates expect a 4-digit year/decade. I could modify the templates to accept 3-digit years/decades (albeit at the cost of some added complexity), but it seems to me that a better solution is to follow the principle adopted at numerous CFDs over the last few years (mostly proposed by @
Marcocapelle) to avoid a collection of
WP:SMALLCATs for these early periods, by consolidating the entries into by-century categories. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs)
12:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Note to closer: If the consensus is to keep either by-year or by-decade categories, please notify me. I will then modify the category header templates to support 3-digit years. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs)
12:03, 11 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:BTS (band)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.