The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment. I didn't take this to speedy because it is not a 'precise' recreation of a deleted category, but if anybody wants to G4 this, I would not object. --
Richhoncho (
talk)
08:15, 5 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Lists of Australian comedy-sitcom television series episodes
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Confusing name. Not all pages included in this category are sitcoms, some are simply comedy series, so it doesn't make sense to group both in the same category. snapsnap(
talk)17:09, 4 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Academics of the University of Malaya
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose This is another example of the North Americanisation of English Wikipedia. In much of the world, particularly Commonwealth countries such as Malaysia, the term "faculty" actually refers to a
division within a university. Only in North America does it refer to
academic personnel. Over the years American and Americanised editors have manipulated Wikipedia categories so that overwhelming majority of categories for academic personnel outside of North America use "faculty" rather than "academics" even though
WP:COMMONNAME requires that they use "academics".--
Obi2canibe (
talk)14:39, 6 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Climate change deniers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose (and populate) climate change is a fact supported by a majority of scientist. To claim climate change is fake to be a denier, straight and simple, same as claiming the Holocaust never happened is to be a Holocaust denier. I know this is probably a lost cause, but the previous two CFDs were faulty in my opinion, and 3 wrongs do not make a right.
Inter&anthro (
talk)
22:19, 5 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Disambiguation page with short description
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete per DexDor. I was under the impression that the disambiguation template provides a short description, so this category would be populated with every dab page? What's the point? —
Xezbeth (
talk)
19:40, 7 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. And I note the template does not provide a short description, just a definition of disambiguation, nothing useful about the page, and so is unneeded anyway per
WP:SHORTDESC. --
JHunterJ (
talk)
20:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Jerry Kilgore (singer) songs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Mass media theorists
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Categories caught in up, speedily, in the not-entirely-thought-out universal find/replace of "media" with "mass media." Their subcats use "media", not "mass media", and I would challenge anyone to find any reliable source that describes a scholar here as a "mass media theorist" rather than a "media theorist." We should follow reliable sources in categorizing articles.
UnitedStatesian (
talk)
21:50, 20 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Is there such a theorist? And is there such a reader who requires such help? And by your logic don't we need even further "helpful" disambiguation to clarify that these are not theorists of media that discusses
the mass of objects?
UnitedStatesian (
talk)
13:27, 21 May 2020 (UTC)reply
I agree that such distinction is not necessary. The category is for "theorists about media" because "media" is inclusive of all "mass" forms (television, radio, newspaper, magazine, etc.) Senator2029“Talk”18:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Oppose, based on the fact that media can also refer to materials used in art, and that there are quite a few people who have expressed theories about their use.
Josef Albers, for example, is a media theorist, though he has little if anything to do with mass media. Note that
Media is a quite comprehensive disambiguation page.
Grutness...wha?03:51, 4 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Eponymous Japanese voice actor management company categories
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Football Federation Australia Hall of Fame inductees
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Canadian Curling Hall of Fame inductees
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose. 90% of curlers in the world are Canadian, thus the Canadian Curling Hall of Fame can be seen as the top curling hall of fame in the world. It's one of the criteria for notability for curlers (
WP:CURLING). It's the equivalent of the
Hockey Hall of Fame for the NHL (which has its own category for membership). It is not the same as the US or Swedish halls. --
Earl Andrew -
talk12:40, 4 June 2020 (UTC)reply
WP:NSPORT frequently uses halls of fame to save time with determining notability for athletes in the article space: "If they are in hall of fame X, they must have done something meaningful in X sport earlier in their lives." The vast majority of HOFs reflect rather than create that fame though so the award is not defining in the category space while the original sources of that fame (Olympics, Brier, etc.) are very defining.
RevelationDirect (
talk)
15:47, 4 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Another
OCAWARD category. So your telling us we should keep this category because "90% of curlers in the world are Canadian, thus the Canadian Curling Hall of Fame can be seen as the top curling hall of fame in the world." This still doesn't even remotely counteract the
OCAWARD policy at all. And your statement a clear example of
WP:ARBITRARYCAT. If were going keep this we might as well make all of the other ones for different lower percentage countries then.
ֆօʍɛɮօɖʏǟռʏɮօɖʏ05 (
talk)
13:35, 4 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment. I didn't take this to speedy because it is not a 'precise' recreation of a deleted category, but if anybody wants to G4 this, I would not object. --
Richhoncho (
talk)
08:15, 5 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Lists of Australian comedy-sitcom television series episodes
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Confusing name. Not all pages included in this category are sitcoms, some are simply comedy series, so it doesn't make sense to group both in the same category. snapsnap(
talk)17:09, 4 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Academics of the University of Malaya
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose This is another example of the North Americanisation of English Wikipedia. In much of the world, particularly Commonwealth countries such as Malaysia, the term "faculty" actually refers to a
division within a university. Only in North America does it refer to
academic personnel. Over the years American and Americanised editors have manipulated Wikipedia categories so that overwhelming majority of categories for academic personnel outside of North America use "faculty" rather than "academics" even though
WP:COMMONNAME requires that they use "academics".--
Obi2canibe (
talk)14:39, 6 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Climate change deniers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose (and populate) climate change is a fact supported by a majority of scientist. To claim climate change is fake to be a denier, straight and simple, same as claiming the Holocaust never happened is to be a Holocaust denier. I know this is probably a lost cause, but the previous two CFDs were faulty in my opinion, and 3 wrongs do not make a right.
Inter&anthro (
talk)
22:19, 5 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Disambiguation page with short description
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete per DexDor. I was under the impression that the disambiguation template provides a short description, so this category would be populated with every dab page? What's the point? —
Xezbeth (
talk)
19:40, 7 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. And I note the template does not provide a short description, just a definition of disambiguation, nothing useful about the page, and so is unneeded anyway per
WP:SHORTDESC. --
JHunterJ (
talk)
20:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Jerry Kilgore (singer) songs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Mass media theorists
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Categories caught in up, speedily, in the not-entirely-thought-out universal find/replace of "media" with "mass media." Their subcats use "media", not "mass media", and I would challenge anyone to find any reliable source that describes a scholar here as a "mass media theorist" rather than a "media theorist." We should follow reliable sources in categorizing articles.
UnitedStatesian (
talk)
21:50, 20 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Is there such a theorist? And is there such a reader who requires such help? And by your logic don't we need even further "helpful" disambiguation to clarify that these are not theorists of media that discusses
the mass of objects?
UnitedStatesian (
talk)
13:27, 21 May 2020 (UTC)reply
I agree that such distinction is not necessary. The category is for "theorists about media" because "media" is inclusive of all "mass" forms (television, radio, newspaper, magazine, etc.) Senator2029“Talk”18:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Oppose, based on the fact that media can also refer to materials used in art, and that there are quite a few people who have expressed theories about their use.
Josef Albers, for example, is a media theorist, though he has little if anything to do with mass media. Note that
Media is a quite comprehensive disambiguation page.
Grutness...wha?03:51, 4 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Eponymous Japanese voice actor management company categories
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Football Federation Australia Hall of Fame inductees
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Canadian Curling Hall of Fame inductees
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose. 90% of curlers in the world are Canadian, thus the Canadian Curling Hall of Fame can be seen as the top curling hall of fame in the world. It's one of the criteria for notability for curlers (
WP:CURLING). It's the equivalent of the
Hockey Hall of Fame for the NHL (which has its own category for membership). It is not the same as the US or Swedish halls. --
Earl Andrew -
talk12:40, 4 June 2020 (UTC)reply
WP:NSPORT frequently uses halls of fame to save time with determining notability for athletes in the article space: "If they are in hall of fame X, they must have done something meaningful in X sport earlier in their lives." The vast majority of HOFs reflect rather than create that fame though so the award is not defining in the category space while the original sources of that fame (Olympics, Brier, etc.) are very defining.
RevelationDirect (
talk)
15:47, 4 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Another
OCAWARD category. So your telling us we should keep this category because "90% of curlers in the world are Canadian, thus the Canadian Curling Hall of Fame can be seen as the top curling hall of fame in the world." This still doesn't even remotely counteract the
OCAWARD policy at all. And your statement a clear example of
WP:ARBITRARYCAT. If were going keep this we might as well make all of the other ones for different lower percentage countries then.
ֆօʍɛɮօɖʏǟռʏɮօɖʏ05 (
talk)
13:35, 4 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.