The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Sandpipers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Sandpiper and
Scolopacidae appear to be the same topic. A merge in the other direction is also a possibility (in which case it would need to be placed under
Category:Charadriiformes). However, my preference is to keep the category at the scientific name (e.g. that has a lot more interwiki links). DexDor(talk)18:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Coxeter plane graphs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People from St. Petersburg, Pennsylvania
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Bedlington United F.C. players
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
@
Armbrust: I interpreted "(ii) unilaterally to reflect an official renaming which is verified by one or more citations (provided in the nomination)" as covering my unilateral move to correct the creator's standard assumption of F.C. as the club's suffix to A.F.C. per citation provided, which was as official as you'll get 80 years after the club folded. My mistake, then? cheers,
Struway2 (
talk)
09:46, 1 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Allahabad division
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose for now, the category name should be changed after the name of the main article is changed, not before that has taken place. An RM is definitely required here.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
14:58, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
2. for 2 years now, so no, it is not too recent, like
User:Kashmiri writes.
3. it was renamed by the official government of India, which is recognized by everyone, not some interim government or dictator
4. the idea to rename the city to
Prayagraj was planned for a very long time, so it sure will be kept, like it is the case with
Chennai and others.
5. almost all of European Wikipedias renamed it to
Prayagraj already, even Aserbaidschan, which is predominantly Muslim
6. the inhabitants accepted the name change
7. Some Wikipedias still dont rename the article because English Wikipedia has not done so yet, so it is important that you accept the renaming and dont disapoint the Wikipedianer who are pro a name change, which is the majority,because
8. On the discussion of the article
Allahabad there have been many attempts by many different writers, who wanted the renaming, more than against it (mostly
User:Kashmiri writing singlehandedly) it matters a lot to them
9. Last but not least: It is the original language exisiting far longer than the name right now, which was renamed to Allahabad under occupation
10. Google and Britannica are using the new name
Prayagraj already - the 2 most influential sources in this matter of all
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Faizabad division
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Mario (franchise)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose. Regardless of whatever note was left in the category, the head topic of this is clearly
Mario (franchise) and not the Mario character, as can be seen by the parent categories which are about franchises and not the character. If you move switch the primary between the character and the franchise, then this nomination can work. --
Gonnym (
talk)
09:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The franchise is called Evil Dead, not all of these comics use the third movie specific title Army of Darkness.
★Trekker (
talk)
09:53, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Evil Bong (franchise)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional calendars
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:SMALLCAT, this category inherently cannot be expanded. I'm sure calendars exist in most fiction, but there aren't reliable third party sources to create a meaningful number of articles. In the rare instance where a calendar plays a significant role in a work of fiction, it can likely be covered as part of the
WP:PLOT in context with the rest of the fiction's development and reception.
Shooterwalker (
talk)
07:01, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:The Chronicles of Riddick (franchise) video games
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I don't know how to merge, and it has the same effect, it takes pretty much zero effort to add a parent category to these two pages.
★Trekker (
talk)
06:45, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Agree that it takes pretty much zero effort, but if you do not propose merging, the closing administrator will not actually do that. So you do not need to know how to merge, you just need to mention it in the proposal and the closing admin will take care of the implementation.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
07:00, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Grand prix des lectrices de Elle winners
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The
Grand prix des lectrices de Elle is a book award by the readers of
Elle fashion magazine and this category groups the authors of those books. The award is definitely notable as ongoing feature in the magazine "aimed at giving a voice to women who love to read", as the article puts it. The award doesn't seem defining to the biography articles though: they tend to mention the award in passing with other honors, although a few have it in the lede or don't mention it at all. This is one of many French literary award categories created in late 2016/early 2017. The winners are already listified
here in the main article for any reader interested in the topic. -
RevelationDirect (
talk)
00:08, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Waterstones Book of the Year
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The "Waterstones Book of the Year" is a book award established in 2012 by
Waterstones, a British chain of bookstores. This is partly an actual award with a judging panel that selects a winner from a shortlist, and partly a marketing device for promoting the sales of books (see
here and
here). The award doesn't seem particularly defining to the articles in this category: most mention the award in passing with other honors, although one mentions it in the lede and one not at all. The winners are already listified
here in a section within the company article for any reader interested in the topic. -
RevelationDirect (
talk)
00:08, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Sandpipers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Sandpiper and
Scolopacidae appear to be the same topic. A merge in the other direction is also a possibility (in which case it would need to be placed under
Category:Charadriiformes). However, my preference is to keep the category at the scientific name (e.g. that has a lot more interwiki links). DexDor(talk)18:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Coxeter plane graphs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People from St. Petersburg, Pennsylvania
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Bedlington United F.C. players
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
@
Armbrust: I interpreted "(ii) unilaterally to reflect an official renaming which is verified by one or more citations (provided in the nomination)" as covering my unilateral move to correct the creator's standard assumption of F.C. as the club's suffix to A.F.C. per citation provided, which was as official as you'll get 80 years after the club folded. My mistake, then? cheers,
Struway2 (
talk)
09:46, 1 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Allahabad division
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose for now, the category name should be changed after the name of the main article is changed, not before that has taken place. An RM is definitely required here.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
14:58, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
2. for 2 years now, so no, it is not too recent, like
User:Kashmiri writes.
3. it was renamed by the official government of India, which is recognized by everyone, not some interim government or dictator
4. the idea to rename the city to
Prayagraj was planned for a very long time, so it sure will be kept, like it is the case with
Chennai and others.
5. almost all of European Wikipedias renamed it to
Prayagraj already, even Aserbaidschan, which is predominantly Muslim
6. the inhabitants accepted the name change
7. Some Wikipedias still dont rename the article because English Wikipedia has not done so yet, so it is important that you accept the renaming and dont disapoint the Wikipedianer who are pro a name change, which is the majority,because
8. On the discussion of the article
Allahabad there have been many attempts by many different writers, who wanted the renaming, more than against it (mostly
User:Kashmiri writing singlehandedly) it matters a lot to them
9. Last but not least: It is the original language exisiting far longer than the name right now, which was renamed to Allahabad under occupation
10. Google and Britannica are using the new name
Prayagraj already - the 2 most influential sources in this matter of all
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Faizabad division
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Mario (franchise)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose. Regardless of whatever note was left in the category, the head topic of this is clearly
Mario (franchise) and not the Mario character, as can be seen by the parent categories which are about franchises and not the character. If you move switch the primary between the character and the franchise, then this nomination can work. --
Gonnym (
talk)
09:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The franchise is called Evil Dead, not all of these comics use the third movie specific title Army of Darkness.
★Trekker (
talk)
09:53, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Evil Bong (franchise)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional calendars
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:SMALLCAT, this category inherently cannot be expanded. I'm sure calendars exist in most fiction, but there aren't reliable third party sources to create a meaningful number of articles. In the rare instance where a calendar plays a significant role in a work of fiction, it can likely be covered as part of the
WP:PLOT in context with the rest of the fiction's development and reception.
Shooterwalker (
talk)
07:01, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:The Chronicles of Riddick (franchise) video games
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I don't know how to merge, and it has the same effect, it takes pretty much zero effort to add a parent category to these two pages.
★Trekker (
talk)
06:45, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Agree that it takes pretty much zero effort, but if you do not propose merging, the closing administrator will not actually do that. So you do not need to know how to merge, you just need to mention it in the proposal and the closing admin will take care of the implementation.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
07:00, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Grand prix des lectrices de Elle winners
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The
Grand prix des lectrices de Elle is a book award by the readers of
Elle fashion magazine and this category groups the authors of those books. The award is definitely notable as ongoing feature in the magazine "aimed at giving a voice to women who love to read", as the article puts it. The award doesn't seem defining to the biography articles though: they tend to mention the award in passing with other honors, although a few have it in the lede or don't mention it at all. This is one of many French literary award categories created in late 2016/early 2017. The winners are already listified
here in the main article for any reader interested in the topic. -
RevelationDirect (
talk)
00:08, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Waterstones Book of the Year
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The "Waterstones Book of the Year" is a book award established in 2012 by
Waterstones, a British chain of bookstores. This is partly an actual award with a judging panel that selects a winner from a shortlist, and partly a marketing device for promoting the sales of books (see
here and
here). The award doesn't seem particularly defining to the articles in this category: most mention the award in passing with other honors, although one mentions it in the lede and one not at all. The winners are already listified
here in a section within the company article for any reader interested in the topic. -
RevelationDirect (
talk)
00:08, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.