The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
LGBT and
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Historical sanctuaries
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: manually merge, apart from religious sanctuaries (in a separate subcategory) this is is a case of
WP:SHAREDNAME, these are historic sites that happen to have "sanctuary" in the name. Note: most of the content is already otherwise in the target categories, so it's not recommendable to have the merge implemented by the bot.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
11:34, 15 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Sanctuary is not a (historic) site, it is a concept. Just because the concept is under attack it is no reason to cauterize it incorrectly. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
71.89.74.7 (
talk)
14:25, 24 February 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Insects acting as insect pest control agents
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:English athletes
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment, this is an understandable misunderstanding. Non-diffusing is about the relationship with the (British) parent category, diffusing is about the relationship with the subcategories (by sports). That can happen at the same time.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
11:29, 15 February 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Beneficial insects
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This is a vague category - for example, should it apply to insects that are generally considered pests (e.g.
Red imported fire ant), but may also provide some benefit (also some insects are beneficial to humans at one stage of life but a pest at another stage). It's also non-defining in many cases (e.g.
Eastern yellowjacket). No other animals (or plants) (e.g. spiders, fish, birds) are categorized for being beneficial. Note: There are alternative categories (such as
Category:Pollinator insects) which are less vague and do a better job of grouping similar articles. DexDor(talk)08:01, 15 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Support. Pretty speciesist, too. As the article says, The concept of beneficial is subjective and only arises in light of desired outcomes from a human perspective. So in the broad sense of the term it should mean beneficial to other animals in general (and as part of an ecosystem, almost all insects would count), and in the narrow sense it's described as subjective. Either way it's a clumsy subject for a category.
Grutness...wha?03:08, 16 February 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Italian American heavy metal musicians
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:This Movie Sucks! episodes
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Serie A de México players
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Populated places in Province No. 4
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
LGBT and
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Historical sanctuaries
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: manually merge, apart from religious sanctuaries (in a separate subcategory) this is is a case of
WP:SHAREDNAME, these are historic sites that happen to have "sanctuary" in the name. Note: most of the content is already otherwise in the target categories, so it's not recommendable to have the merge implemented by the bot.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
11:34, 15 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Sanctuary is not a (historic) site, it is a concept. Just because the concept is under attack it is no reason to cauterize it incorrectly. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
71.89.74.7 (
talk)
14:25, 24 February 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Insects acting as insect pest control agents
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:English athletes
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment, this is an understandable misunderstanding. Non-diffusing is about the relationship with the (British) parent category, diffusing is about the relationship with the subcategories (by sports). That can happen at the same time.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
11:29, 15 February 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Beneficial insects
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This is a vague category - for example, should it apply to insects that are generally considered pests (e.g.
Red imported fire ant), but may also provide some benefit (also some insects are beneficial to humans at one stage of life but a pest at another stage). It's also non-defining in many cases (e.g.
Eastern yellowjacket). No other animals (or plants) (e.g. spiders, fish, birds) are categorized for being beneficial. Note: There are alternative categories (such as
Category:Pollinator insects) which are less vague and do a better job of grouping similar articles. DexDor(talk)08:01, 15 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Support. Pretty speciesist, too. As the article says, The concept of beneficial is subjective and only arises in light of desired outcomes from a human perspective. So in the broad sense of the term it should mean beneficial to other animals in general (and as part of an ecosystem, almost all insects would count), and in the narrow sense it's described as subjective. Either way it's a clumsy subject for a category.
Grutness...wha?03:08, 16 February 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Italian American heavy metal musicians
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:This Movie Sucks! episodes
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Serie A de México players
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Populated places in Province No. 4
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.