Category:Television series based on Street Fighter
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: "Street Fighter" is not a singular work, it's a franchise, it makes more sense to treat it like other franchise categories.
★Trekker (
talk) 22:33, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Support I agree that this is a media franchise, and not a singular work.
Dimadick (
talk) 17:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Street Fighter (1970s series) films
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Current name is very clunky.
★Trekker (
talk) 22:23, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Support To match the title of the original film. Though the film series could use its own main article.
Dimadick (
talk) 17:53, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Historic places in Brazil
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete as a duplicate. --
Just N. (
talk) 20:27, 25 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Historic places in Estonia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete as a duplicate. --
Just N. (
talk) 20:27, 25 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Proposed states and territories of India
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support To match its parent category.
Dimadick (
talk) 17:56, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Support per above. --
Ab207 (
talk) 06:33, 22 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Support per nom. --
Just N. (
talk) 20:29, 25 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Industry
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment: The split would work for me. An alternative I was thinking about was to keep the two category names as is but give
Category:Industry the meaning
industry (economics) and make it a
WP:TOPICCAT while
Category:Industries becomes the corresponding
WP:SETCAT for the same meaning. Not sure this would be understood though. --
S.K. (
talk) 18:23, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Support I think this is a clearer breakdown. Definitely open to reconsideration of concerns from other editors though. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 00:48, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Yep, cool, that would work. Singular for the topic category and plural for the set category. Perfect for me. --
S.K. (
talk) 08:59, 22 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Support Clearer disambiguation.
Dimadick (
talk) 17:57, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Support To provide more clearer categorization.
desmay (
talk) 19:07, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Support — match main articles. Really like that we are carefully distingishing set categories. William Allen Simpson (
talk) 20:24, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Support I was involved in splitting the article, so this seems like a natural next step (off-topic, but the
Outline of industry probably needs splitting too). Also, while maybe not relevant for categories, much of the split content actually wound up in
Industrial society rather than
Industry (economics) or
Industry (manufacturing). That corresponded to "industry" in the vague sense of how an industrialized economy works in the abstract. --
Zar2gar1 (
talk) 03:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Support — match main articles. --
Just N. (
talk) 20:30, 25 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Mayors of places in Azerbaijan
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: merge per
WP:SMALLCAT, just one or two articles in each of these categories and they are not part of a large overall accepted sub-categorization scheme.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 10:18, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge for Now While these places likely had more than five mayors, most would be non-notable. No objection to recreating later if I'm wrong and any ever get to 5+ articles.
RevelationDirect (
talk) 11:23, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Midnight Club
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete, redundant category layer similar to
WP:OCEPON cases, all content is already in the subcategory.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 10:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
(as nom) I am neutral towards deletion of the subcategory. Four articles is a borderline
WP:SMALLCAT.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 14:18, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Parent/Keep Subcat per nom. While I normally prefer 5+ articles, the subcategory has growth potential and would need to be tagged. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 00:45, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Crazy Taxi
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete; merging contents as appropriate to subcategories'.
Good Ol’factory(talk) 03:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale:delete, redundant category layer similar to
WP:OCEPON cases, all content is already in the video games subcategory.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 10:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
I can't say I understand why this category, the original one for the series, should be deleted. Can you please point me to the relevant Wikipedia policy?ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 20:01, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
WP:CAT: "The central goal of the category system is to provide navigational links to Wikipedia pages." This category only links to the eponymous article and one valid video games subcategory as content. Other than that it links to a template (which we normally do not include in a content category) and a subcategory of media files (which are included in the articles anyway). So the category does not provide any navigational benefit.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 06:28, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Dream Chronicles
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete, redundant category layer similar to
WP:OCEPON cases, all content is already in the subcategory.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 10:13, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Background In the past, we've deleted dozens of similar categories for high ranking visitors and those nominations are
listed right here. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 01:06, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete but listify properly -- These diplomatic honours are a menace in WP, but rather than a talk page, the list should actually be created. This should be a matter of course.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 17:46, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
There is not even an article about the award, i.e. it is currently uncertain whether the award is notable or not. Then there is certainly no requirement for listification.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:23, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
I share PKI's goal but I do not feel able to write an article that would pass
WP:LISTN. I just added this award to the requested articles at
Wikipedia:WikiProject Sudan and linked the list of recipients there. Hopefully an editor with more topic area knowledge will pick it up but I don't favor keeping this non-defining category in the mean time.
RevelationDirect (
talk) 19:33, 24 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete If someone can create an adequately sourced article on the award, they can amend a list of receipients to it, but we should not mandate creating such a list in the abscence of reliable sources.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 13:28, 28 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Recipients of Geuzenpenning
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The
Geuzen Resistance 1940–1945 Foundation is an organization based in the Vlaardingen, Netherlands that gives out the
Geuzenpenning award each year for fighting for "democracy and against dictatorship, racism and discrimination" in memory of the WWII resistance. The articles in the category are about evenly split between those that mention the award in passing and those that don't mention it at all so it doesn't seem defining for
Václav Havel,
Noel Pearson or
Harry Wu. Organizational winners like
Amnesty International, the
Anne Frank Foundation and
Doctors Without Borders also don't seem defined by it. The contents are already listified right here
in the main article for any reader interested in the topic. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 01:06, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete We need to do much better at removing categories that violate OCAWARD rules.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 13:29, 28 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Television series based on Street Fighter
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: "Street Fighter" is not a singular work, it's a franchise, it makes more sense to treat it like other franchise categories.
★Trekker (
talk) 22:33, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Support I agree that this is a media franchise, and not a singular work.
Dimadick (
talk) 17:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Street Fighter (1970s series) films
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Current name is very clunky.
★Trekker (
talk) 22:23, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Support To match the title of the original film. Though the film series could use its own main article.
Dimadick (
talk) 17:53, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Historic places in Brazil
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete as a duplicate. --
Just N. (
talk) 20:27, 25 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Historic places in Estonia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete as a duplicate. --
Just N. (
talk) 20:27, 25 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Proposed states and territories of India
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support To match its parent category.
Dimadick (
talk) 17:56, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Support per above. --
Ab207 (
talk) 06:33, 22 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Support per nom. --
Just N. (
talk) 20:29, 25 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Industry
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment: The split would work for me. An alternative I was thinking about was to keep the two category names as is but give
Category:Industry the meaning
industry (economics) and make it a
WP:TOPICCAT while
Category:Industries becomes the corresponding
WP:SETCAT for the same meaning. Not sure this would be understood though. --
S.K. (
talk) 18:23, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Support I think this is a clearer breakdown. Definitely open to reconsideration of concerns from other editors though. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 00:48, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Yep, cool, that would work. Singular for the topic category and plural for the set category. Perfect for me. --
S.K. (
talk) 08:59, 22 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Support Clearer disambiguation.
Dimadick (
talk) 17:57, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Support To provide more clearer categorization.
desmay (
talk) 19:07, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Support — match main articles. Really like that we are carefully distingishing set categories. William Allen Simpson (
talk) 20:24, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Support I was involved in splitting the article, so this seems like a natural next step (off-topic, but the
Outline of industry probably needs splitting too). Also, while maybe not relevant for categories, much of the split content actually wound up in
Industrial society rather than
Industry (economics) or
Industry (manufacturing). That corresponded to "industry" in the vague sense of how an industrialized economy works in the abstract. --
Zar2gar1 (
talk) 03:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Support — match main articles. --
Just N. (
talk) 20:30, 25 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Mayors of places in Azerbaijan
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: merge per
WP:SMALLCAT, just one or two articles in each of these categories and they are not part of a large overall accepted sub-categorization scheme.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 10:18, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge for Now While these places likely had more than five mayors, most would be non-notable. No objection to recreating later if I'm wrong and any ever get to 5+ articles.
RevelationDirect (
talk) 11:23, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Midnight Club
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete, redundant category layer similar to
WP:OCEPON cases, all content is already in the subcategory.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 10:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
(as nom) I am neutral towards deletion of the subcategory. Four articles is a borderline
WP:SMALLCAT.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 14:18, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Parent/Keep Subcat per nom. While I normally prefer 5+ articles, the subcategory has growth potential and would need to be tagged. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 00:45, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Crazy Taxi
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete; merging contents as appropriate to subcategories'.
Good Ol’factory(talk) 03:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale:delete, redundant category layer similar to
WP:OCEPON cases, all content is already in the video games subcategory.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 10:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
I can't say I understand why this category, the original one for the series, should be deleted. Can you please point me to the relevant Wikipedia policy?ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 20:01, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
WP:CAT: "The central goal of the category system is to provide navigational links to Wikipedia pages." This category only links to the eponymous article and one valid video games subcategory as content. Other than that it links to a template (which we normally do not include in a content category) and a subcategory of media files (which are included in the articles anyway). So the category does not provide any navigational benefit.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 06:28, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Dream Chronicles
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete, redundant category layer similar to
WP:OCEPON cases, all content is already in the subcategory.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 10:13, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Background In the past, we've deleted dozens of similar categories for high ranking visitors and those nominations are
listed right here. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 01:06, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete but listify properly -- These diplomatic honours are a menace in WP, but rather than a talk page, the list should actually be created. This should be a matter of course.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 17:46, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
There is not even an article about the award, i.e. it is currently uncertain whether the award is notable or not. Then there is certainly no requirement for listification.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:23, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
I share PKI's goal but I do not feel able to write an article that would pass
WP:LISTN. I just added this award to the requested articles at
Wikipedia:WikiProject Sudan and linked the list of recipients there. Hopefully an editor with more topic area knowledge will pick it up but I don't favor keeping this non-defining category in the mean time.
RevelationDirect (
talk) 19:33, 24 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete If someone can create an adequately sourced article on the award, they can amend a list of receipients to it, but we should not mandate creating such a list in the abscence of reliable sources.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 13:28, 28 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Recipients of Geuzenpenning
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The
Geuzen Resistance 1940–1945 Foundation is an organization based in the Vlaardingen, Netherlands that gives out the
Geuzenpenning award each year for fighting for "democracy and against dictatorship, racism and discrimination" in memory of the WWII resistance. The articles in the category are about evenly split between those that mention the award in passing and those that don't mention it at all so it doesn't seem defining for
Václav Havel,
Noel Pearson or
Harry Wu. Organizational winners like
Amnesty International, the
Anne Frank Foundation and
Doctors Without Borders also don't seem defined by it. The contents are already listified right here
in the main article for any reader interested in the topic. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 01:06, 20 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete We need to do much better at removing categories that violate OCAWARD rules.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 13:29, 28 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.