The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Video game downloadable content packs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support Honest no idea why "packs" was included when I created it over 2 years ago. Might have been creating it from a redlink I found. --
ferret (
talk)
18:44, 18 November 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: There are barely any articles in either of the "By country" subcategories for either childbirth or midwifery. Maternity has wider scope.
Rathfelder (
talk)
11:21, 3 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Apologies I've been looking through these categories. I think
Category:Maternity by country is viable, and there are sufficient country articles in it. I had thought to leave the individual country articles for later consideration, but I cant see anything in the Childbirth by country categories which couldn't happily fit into the appropriate maternity category. I'm not so sure about the midwifery articles.
Rathfelder (
talk)
19:58, 3 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Support most but Keep midwifery separate. We also have a midwives by country tree, which is well populated. It may be that some midwifery material needs purging from the maternity tree.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
17:50, 4 November 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Horror rock
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: According to the article for
horror punk, horror rock is just another name for it. Is there a reason why there is a category for each? StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me17:15, 4 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment The
horror punk article may say that, but I'm not sure it's true. Looking at the contents of
Category:Horror rock and
Category:Horror punk, they share basically none of the same bands, and there does appear to be a clear distinction between them. It feels like a tough case to make, if (via the merge) we're going to present the likes of
Glenn Danzig and
Alice Cooper as "Horror punk" acts. (Update: Merging in the other direction might make more sense, as all punk is rock, but not all rock is punk.) --
FeRDNYC (
talk)
10:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)reply
But horror rock redirects to horror punk, and I don't really find anything online that discusses "horror rock" (except a list by VH1), but there are multiple discussions and articles on what "horror punk" is, such as
Rebel Circus,
Rate Your Music,
Ultimate Guitar and
Daily Collegian. Besides merging, parsing will be necessary as well. Alice Cooper, for example, being more
glam rock and
shock rock as horror rock/horror punk isn't even mentioned in his article, but horror punk is mentioned in Danzig's article. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me16:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)reply
I guess what I'm saying is,
Category:Horror rock may be useful or not, as it stands, but merging it into
Category:Horror punk doesn't seem like it would serve any purpose except to arguably pollute that category with things that may not belong there. The things that do belong in
Category:Horror punk are already there, or in subcats. IMHO, one could make an easier argument for just deletingCategory:Horror rock outright as non-notable / minor, and allowing the various pages and subcats within to just remain reachable via the otherwise-established hierarchy. (It's not like any of these pages are lacking in
WP:OVERCAT.) But since I realize that merges tend to be easier to sell than deletions, typically, I suppose a "merge" that actually adds (almost?) none of
Category:Horror rock to
Category:Horror punk — which I suspect would be the outcome of said merge, once the dust settled — would be a workable compromise. --
FeRDNYC (
talk)
01:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Animated television series about teenagers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
As long as they're all renamed to be consistent, anything should be fine. "_ about adolescence" sounds slightly better to me than "Teen _" because it's a bit more precise (e.g. is a "teen film" a film for a teenage audience or have teenage main characters?), and more true to the idea than "_ about teenagers" (adolescence as opposed to literally having an age between 14 and 19). —
MarkH21 (
talk)
23:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep "about" form I agree with marco that it's less ambigous since the proposed title doesn't make it clear if teens are the subject matter or the audiance while the current title does. Slight preference for adolescence per Marks comment above, but both adolescence and teenagers are fine. ‑‑
Trialpears (
talk)
23:02, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Agrarian politics
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose for the reasons above. This is for eye-related topics, not for the eyes themselves. See also the categories for Ear, Face, Head, Mouth, Nose...
Grutness...wha?23:15, 15 November 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Video game downloadable content packs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support Honest no idea why "packs" was included when I created it over 2 years ago. Might have been creating it from a redlink I found. --
ferret (
talk)
18:44, 18 November 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: There are barely any articles in either of the "By country" subcategories for either childbirth or midwifery. Maternity has wider scope.
Rathfelder (
talk)
11:21, 3 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Apologies I've been looking through these categories. I think
Category:Maternity by country is viable, and there are sufficient country articles in it. I had thought to leave the individual country articles for later consideration, but I cant see anything in the Childbirth by country categories which couldn't happily fit into the appropriate maternity category. I'm not so sure about the midwifery articles.
Rathfelder (
talk)
19:58, 3 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Support most but Keep midwifery separate. We also have a midwives by country tree, which is well populated. It may be that some midwifery material needs purging from the maternity tree.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
17:50, 4 November 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Horror rock
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: According to the article for
horror punk, horror rock is just another name for it. Is there a reason why there is a category for each? StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me17:15, 4 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment The
horror punk article may say that, but I'm not sure it's true. Looking at the contents of
Category:Horror rock and
Category:Horror punk, they share basically none of the same bands, and there does appear to be a clear distinction between them. It feels like a tough case to make, if (via the merge) we're going to present the likes of
Glenn Danzig and
Alice Cooper as "Horror punk" acts. (Update: Merging in the other direction might make more sense, as all punk is rock, but not all rock is punk.) --
FeRDNYC (
talk)
10:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)reply
But horror rock redirects to horror punk, and I don't really find anything online that discusses "horror rock" (except a list by VH1), but there are multiple discussions and articles on what "horror punk" is, such as
Rebel Circus,
Rate Your Music,
Ultimate Guitar and
Daily Collegian. Besides merging, parsing will be necessary as well. Alice Cooper, for example, being more
glam rock and
shock rock as horror rock/horror punk isn't even mentioned in his article, but horror punk is mentioned in Danzig's article. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me16:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)reply
I guess what I'm saying is,
Category:Horror rock may be useful or not, as it stands, but merging it into
Category:Horror punk doesn't seem like it would serve any purpose except to arguably pollute that category with things that may not belong there. The things that do belong in
Category:Horror punk are already there, or in subcats. IMHO, one could make an easier argument for just deletingCategory:Horror rock outright as non-notable / minor, and allowing the various pages and subcats within to just remain reachable via the otherwise-established hierarchy. (It's not like any of these pages are lacking in
WP:OVERCAT.) But since I realize that merges tend to be easier to sell than deletions, typically, I suppose a "merge" that actually adds (almost?) none of
Category:Horror rock to
Category:Horror punk — which I suspect would be the outcome of said merge, once the dust settled — would be a workable compromise. --
FeRDNYC (
talk)
01:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Animated television series about teenagers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
As long as they're all renamed to be consistent, anything should be fine. "_ about adolescence" sounds slightly better to me than "Teen _" because it's a bit more precise (e.g. is a "teen film" a film for a teenage audience or have teenage main characters?), and more true to the idea than "_ about teenagers" (adolescence as opposed to literally having an age between 14 and 19). —
MarkH21 (
talk)
23:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep "about" form I agree with marco that it's less ambigous since the proposed title doesn't make it clear if teens are the subject matter or the audiance while the current title does. Slight preference for adolescence per Marks comment above, but both adolescence and teenagers are fine. ‑‑
Trialpears (
talk)
23:02, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Agrarian politics
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose for the reasons above. This is for eye-related topics, not for the eyes themselves. See also the categories for Ear, Face, Head, Mouth, Nose...
Grutness...wha?23:15, 15 November 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.