The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:upmerge, only two subcategories in this container category and the parent
Category:Mosques in Kazakhstan is even thinner-populated.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 22:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge This added layer isn't adding navigational value.
RevelationDirect (
talk) 01:55, 15 March 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Team's players categories are never separated by league.
American Money (
talk) 17:00, 14 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions.
GiantSnowman 08:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge all - as nom says, we do not have separate categories for clubs depending on what league they played in.
GiantSnowman 08:29, 15 March 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Needing infoboxes
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:speedy delete per
WP:G8: Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page. @
Gonnym, for future reference these categories need not have been brought to a CFD discussion. They could simply have been tagged with {{Db-g8}} or {{Db-templatecat}}. That would have been less work for everyone. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs) 10:03, 21 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: The category documentation only mentions a deleted template. Not sure if this is still used or should be removed.
Gonnym (
talk) 12:38, 14 March 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People permanently banned from Twitter
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Years in London
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: upmerge per
WP:SMALLCAT, only 1 article in each of these categories, and big gaps between the years, which makes navigation between the articles cumbersome.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:51, 14 March 2019 (UTC)reply
ALT For the second target, make it the decades of the century in London (e.g.
Category:1740s in London). If these too are too small, they can be the subject of later nominations.
Laurel Lodged (
talk) 22:28, 14 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Support Laurel Lodged alternative idea.
Grutness...wha? 02:40, 15 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Nomination adapted for the 18th century.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 17:13, 15 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Support as amended. There should be enough for decade categories. I suspect this could be carried back into 17th century, but this may depend on whether there is yet enough population.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 16:29, 17 March 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People from the Northern Rivers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:upmerge, only two subcategories in this container category and the parent
Category:Mosques in Kazakhstan is even thinner-populated.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 22:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge This added layer isn't adding navigational value.
RevelationDirect (
talk) 01:55, 15 March 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Team's players categories are never separated by league.
American Money (
talk) 17:00, 14 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions.
GiantSnowman 08:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge all - as nom says, we do not have separate categories for clubs depending on what league they played in.
GiantSnowman 08:29, 15 March 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Needing infoboxes
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:speedy delete per
WP:G8: Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page. @
Gonnym, for future reference these categories need not have been brought to a CFD discussion. They could simply have been tagged with {{Db-g8}} or {{Db-templatecat}}. That would have been less work for everyone. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs) 10:03, 21 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: The category documentation only mentions a deleted template. Not sure if this is still used or should be removed.
Gonnym (
talk) 12:38, 14 March 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People permanently banned from Twitter
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Years in London
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: upmerge per
WP:SMALLCAT, only 1 article in each of these categories, and big gaps between the years, which makes navigation between the articles cumbersome.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:51, 14 March 2019 (UTC)reply
ALT For the second target, make it the decades of the century in London (e.g.
Category:1740s in London). If these too are too small, they can be the subject of later nominations.
Laurel Lodged (
talk) 22:28, 14 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Support Laurel Lodged alternative idea.
Grutness...wha? 02:40, 15 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Nomination adapted for the 18th century.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 17:13, 15 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Support as amended. There should be enough for decade categories. I suspect this could be carried back into 17th century, but this may depend on whether there is yet enough population.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 16:29, 17 March 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People from the Northern Rivers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.