- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 00:19, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Insufficient content to justify the category, see WP:OCEPON. Could say "merge to Category:El Comité", the category for the literary group founded by Monroy, but that is the same as simply deleting, since all the member pages are already in that one. – Fayenatic London 20:48, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom. See also this related discussion. Marcocapelle ( talk) 16:39, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 July 7#Category:Government organisations of Saudi Arabia
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename.
MER-C
11:00, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Ren'Py games and visual novels to Category:Ren'Py games
- Nominator's rationale: Per visual novel, it is classified as an "interactive game genre", so the current title is redundant. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 14:51, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom. I have thought about this myself several times in the past, but haven't gotten around to proposing a renaming.-- Alexandra IDV talk 08:43, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support. Eliminating redundancy in the category name makes sense, though I'd re-title it as Category:Ren'Py visual novels instead. -- 017Bluefield ( talk) 07:06, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure). Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:40, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT, small with no potential for growth. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 14:49, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Bondegezou ( talk) 11:17, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename.
MER-C
11:00, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Five Nights at Freddy's (series) to Category:Five Nights at Freddy's
- Nominator's rationale: Per renaming of the main article without the parenthesis. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 14:47, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy move per WP:C2D Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 00:06, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename.
MER-C
11:01, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Intercollegiate Soccer Football League Championship team seasons to Category:Intercollegiate Soccer Football League Championship-winning seasons
- Propose renaming Category:Intercollegiate Soccer Football Association Championship team seasons to Category:Intercollegiate Soccer Football Association Championship-winning seasons
- Propose renaming Category:College soccer national championship team seasons (1866–1904) to Category:College soccer national championship-winning seasons (1866–1904)
- Propose renaming Category: NCAA Division I Men's Soccer Championship team seasons to Category:NCAA Division I Men's Soccer Tournament-winning seasons
- Nominator's rationale: the current wording "team seasons" is unclear. The categories contain articles on the winning seasons of the champions. Although many similar North American categories use "champion seasons" or "championship seasons" (see
Category:Champion seasons in sport), this wording would be clumsy where the tournament name ends with "Championship". The fourth one is being renamed after
NCAA Division I Men's Soccer Tournament, and could therefore end with "Tournament champion seasons" if that is preferred. –
Fayenatic
London
14:27, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support: reads better and clearer Quidster4040 ( talk) 22:03, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related discussions. Giant Snowman 10:24, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Giant Snowman 10:25, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 10:58, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Good grief. I think it's fair to say that this is a textbook example of exactly what NOT to create a category for: both signatories of a statement AND people sharing a name. Strangely, these people are not listed in the article Project Steve, which is entirely about the list of people who have signed the statement -- so I guess it would make sense to add these names to the article. Anomalous+0 ( talk) 11:28, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom. This fails DEFCAT: it's never defining for anyone. Bondegezou ( talk) 11:18, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- DElete we do not allow SHAREDNAME categories. Peterkingiron ( talk) 15:20, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: speedy delete (G4). MER-C 17:17, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:SUBJECTIVECAT. There isn't really a widely accepted definition of what a cult film is. See Cult film#Definition. The term is meaningless without context. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 03:30, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Previously deleted here (albeit with a slightly different title), and the whole cult film parent-category was deleted previously too. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 06:39, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per G4 as mentioned above, and tagged as such. No room for improvement here. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 22:09, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as above. Bondegezou ( talk) 11:18, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per LaundryPizza03. Many movies are described at WP as being some form of cult films but most of the time it is either not referenced or not reliably sourced. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:02, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 00:19, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Insufficient content to justify the category, see WP:OCEPON. Could say "merge to Category:El Comité", the category for the literary group founded by Monroy, but that is the same as simply deleting, since all the member pages are already in that one. – Fayenatic London 20:48, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom. See also this related discussion. Marcocapelle ( talk) 16:39, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 July 7#Category:Government organisations of Saudi Arabia
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename.
MER-C
11:00, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Ren'Py games and visual novels to Category:Ren'Py games
- Nominator's rationale: Per visual novel, it is classified as an "interactive game genre", so the current title is redundant. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 14:51, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom. I have thought about this myself several times in the past, but haven't gotten around to proposing a renaming.-- Alexandra IDV talk 08:43, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support. Eliminating redundancy in the category name makes sense, though I'd re-title it as Category:Ren'Py visual novels instead. -- 017Bluefield ( talk) 07:06, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure). Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:40, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT, small with no potential for growth. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 14:49, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Bondegezou ( talk) 11:17, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename.
MER-C
11:00, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Five Nights at Freddy's (series) to Category:Five Nights at Freddy's
- Nominator's rationale: Per renaming of the main article without the parenthesis. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 14:47, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy move per WP:C2D Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 00:06, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename.
MER-C
11:01, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Intercollegiate Soccer Football League Championship team seasons to Category:Intercollegiate Soccer Football League Championship-winning seasons
- Propose renaming Category:Intercollegiate Soccer Football Association Championship team seasons to Category:Intercollegiate Soccer Football Association Championship-winning seasons
- Propose renaming Category:College soccer national championship team seasons (1866–1904) to Category:College soccer national championship-winning seasons (1866–1904)
- Propose renaming Category: NCAA Division I Men's Soccer Championship team seasons to Category:NCAA Division I Men's Soccer Tournament-winning seasons
- Nominator's rationale: the current wording "team seasons" is unclear. The categories contain articles on the winning seasons of the champions. Although many similar North American categories use "champion seasons" or "championship seasons" (see
Category:Champion seasons in sport), this wording would be clumsy where the tournament name ends with "Championship". The fourth one is being renamed after
NCAA Division I Men's Soccer Tournament, and could therefore end with "Tournament champion seasons" if that is preferred. –
Fayenatic
London
14:27, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support: reads better and clearer Quidster4040 ( talk) 22:03, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related discussions. Giant Snowman 10:24, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Giant Snowman 10:25, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 10:58, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Good grief. I think it's fair to say that this is a textbook example of exactly what NOT to create a category for: both signatories of a statement AND people sharing a name. Strangely, these people are not listed in the article Project Steve, which is entirely about the list of people who have signed the statement -- so I guess it would make sense to add these names to the article. Anomalous+0 ( talk) 11:28, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom. This fails DEFCAT: it's never defining for anyone. Bondegezou ( talk) 11:18, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- DElete we do not allow SHAREDNAME categories. Peterkingiron ( talk) 15:20, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: speedy delete (G4). MER-C 17:17, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:SUBJECTIVECAT. There isn't really a widely accepted definition of what a cult film is. See Cult film#Definition. The term is meaningless without context. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 03:30, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Previously deleted here (albeit with a slightly different title), and the whole cult film parent-category was deleted previously too. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 06:39, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per G4 as mentioned above, and tagged as such. No room for improvement here. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 22:09, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as above. Bondegezou ( talk) 11:18, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per LaundryPizza03. Many movies are described at WP as being some form of cult films but most of the time it is either not referenced or not reliably sourced. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:02, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.