Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< August 1 August 3 >

August 2

Austria at 1938 and Portugal at the 1990, 1994, 1998 FIFA World Cups

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete all. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 00:10, 10 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: delete, Austria did not a play a game at the 1938 World Cup, and Portugal didn't qualify for any World Cup in the 1990s. KingSkyLord ( talk) 20:58, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Comment All of these categories have been emptied and could have been speedied. Liz Read! Talk! 02:37, 3 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 13:11, 5 August 2019 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

2nd millennium in the colonial empires

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 10:03, 10 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: delete, the colonial empires existed entirely within the 2nd millennium so there is no need to diffuse them by millennium. Marcocapelle ( talk) 13:35, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete all -- Almost all millennium categories are unnecessary. Even Egypt has a history of about 50 centuries, so that any higher level period is a waste of space. Peterkingiron ( talk) 11:12, 3 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: Some of these should be upmerged, e.g. Category:British India
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Shrines

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn ( non-admin closure). Marcocapelle ( talk) 10:43, 3 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: merge or reverse merge, shrines are holy places, so we do not need separate categories for shrines and for holy places. Marcocapelle ( talk) 12:55, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose. Yes, all shrines are holy places, but not all holy places are shrines. These seem like quite reasonable subcategories. And these categories are also part of the Category:Shrines tree. All churches are also holy places, too - do we need a Category:Church buildings? Grutness... wha? 03:40, 3 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Withdrawn, this is a mistake indeed. Marcocapelle ( talk) 10:43, 3 August 2019 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Belgian awards

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 14:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, each of the categories only contains the eponymous article and a subcategory of recipients. Marcocapelle ( talk) 08:12, 20 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 10:43, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Sri Lankan awards

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 14:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, each of the categories only contains the eponymous article. Marcocapelle ( talk) 08:12, 20 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 10:43, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Furniture manufacturers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: nomination withdrawn. MER-C 18:14, 8 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: This is the parent of Category:Furniture companies by country Those categories mostly contain both manufacturers and retailers, and for most countries not separated. Many of the companies both manufacture and retail. Rathfelder ( talk) 21:27, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 10:42, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • For clarification for the closer of this discussion: this means the nomination as such has been withdrawn. Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:07, 6 August 2019 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Awards of the Western Cape

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/delete. MER-C 10:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: upmerge per WP:SMALLCAT, currently only two articles in the category and none of the other provinces of South Africa have their own category. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:52, 19 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 10:42, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Merge, and delete intermediate category which would come empty, so I have added it to the nomination. – Fayenatic London 07:06, 5 August 2019 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:World Heritage Tentative List by Bosnia and Herzegovina

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus to delete, so rename to Category:World Heritage Tentative List for Bosnia and Herzegovina. – Fayenatic London 09:44, 16 October 2019 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Category appears to have been created by a non-native speaker of English, and "...by Bosnia and Herzegovina" is clearly not correct. According to Wikipedia:Category names#State-based topics, it seems that it should be "...of Bosnia and Herzegovina", but "...in Bosnia and Herzegovina" is also a possibility. Richard3120 ( talk) 15:01, 16 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as non-defining - e.g. this characteristic isn't even mentioned in the text of the Sarajevo article. DexDor (talk) 05:33, 17 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, being on a tentative list is far from defining. Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:32, 19 July 2019 (UTC) reply
@ DexDor: @ Marcocapelle: by the same argument, do you think the category below regarding Colombia should go as well? Richard3120 ( talk) 23:36, 19 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep but Suggest "for", not by or of. These are submitted by governmental bodies, so that this is NOT WP:OR. If to be deleted, listify first. Peterkingiron ( talk) 14:49, 20 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 10:41, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - Being on Tentative list is actually quite important part of the process, a crucial step, and by that I mean it's most certainly "defining" enough no matter how we look on it from the perspective of Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I created both World Heritage Tentative List by country‎ and Category:World Heritage Tentative List by Bosnia and Herzegovina, and that "by"/"for"/"of" is most likely a slip on my part while copy/pasting, I probably wouldn't make such a glaring error even as a non-native speaker, however much more important is that I created it to make some sense of a Category:World Heritage Site Tentative list, containing 184 pages already, with various angles on the subject matter from all over the world, simply stacked there, on top of each other. So, question is, what will you do to make that category more useful and easier to navigate.-- ౪ Santa ౪ 99° 21:08, 20 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep but rename using "for" (or "of", whatever is more appropriate)-- ౪ Santa ౪ 99° 15:31, 23 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep for now While I agree that being on the tentative list isn't a defining as most of the pages in the category doesn't mention it in prose, it would be improper to delete just this subcategory as that would make navigation in Category:World Heritage Tentative List by Bosnia and Herzegovina worse. I would be infavor of deleting the whole category tree in a new nomination after listifying. Regarding the name I am in favor of "for" since it's talking about the list, not the places. There's an argument for both of and in since world heritage can include both natural and manmade object which would use of and in respecctivley per WP:CATNAME and I thus have no opinion between them. -- Trialpears ( talk) 18:06, 29 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Being on a tentative list is not remotely a defining characteristic, and generally speaking, nominations for such honors are often fluff events in and of themselves, with many nominations having no real hope of making the chosen pick. Newshunter12 ( talk) 00:04, 23 September 2019 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:World Heritage Tentative List by Colombia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus to delete, so rename to Category:World Heritage Tentative List for Colombia. – Fayenatic London 09:44, 16 October 2019 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Category appears to have been created by a non-native speaker of English, and "...by Colombia" is clearly not correct. According to Wikipedia:Category names#State-based topics, it seems that it should be "...of Colombia", but "...in Colombia" is also a possibility. Richard3120 ( talk) 14:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as non-defining - e.g. this characteristic isn't even mentioned in the text of the Ciudad Perdida article. DexDor (talk) 06:06, 20 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, being on a tentative list is far from defining. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep but Suggest "for", not by or of. I assume that these are submitted by governmental bodies, though it is not clear here, so that this is NOT WP:OR. If to be deleted, listify first. Peterkingiron ( talk) 14:51, 20 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 10:41, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • As with the discussion just above, nobody claims that this is a case of WP:OR. Marcocapelle ( talk) 10:18, 4 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per my comment above, but rename using "for" (or "of", whatever is adequate).-- ౪ Santa ౪ 99° 15:33, 23 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep for now In favor of "for". See my comment above for full opinions. -- Trialpears ( talk) 18:09, 29 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Being on a tentative list is not remotely a defining characteristic, and generally speaking, nominations for such honors are often fluff events in and of themselves, with many nominations having no real hope of making the chosen pick. Newshunter12 ( talk) 00:05, 23 September 2019 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_August_2&oldid=921539287"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< August 1 August 3 >

August 2

Austria at 1938 and Portugal at the 1990, 1994, 1998 FIFA World Cups

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete all. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 00:10, 10 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: delete, Austria did not a play a game at the 1938 World Cup, and Portugal didn't qualify for any World Cup in the 1990s. KingSkyLord ( talk) 20:58, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Comment All of these categories have been emptied and could have been speedied. Liz Read! Talk! 02:37, 3 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 13:11, 5 August 2019 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

2nd millennium in the colonial empires

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 10:03, 10 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: delete, the colonial empires existed entirely within the 2nd millennium so there is no need to diffuse them by millennium. Marcocapelle ( talk) 13:35, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete all -- Almost all millennium categories are unnecessary. Even Egypt has a history of about 50 centuries, so that any higher level period is a waste of space. Peterkingiron ( talk) 11:12, 3 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: Some of these should be upmerged, e.g. Category:British India
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Shrines

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn ( non-admin closure). Marcocapelle ( talk) 10:43, 3 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: merge or reverse merge, shrines are holy places, so we do not need separate categories for shrines and for holy places. Marcocapelle ( talk) 12:55, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose. Yes, all shrines are holy places, but not all holy places are shrines. These seem like quite reasonable subcategories. And these categories are also part of the Category:Shrines tree. All churches are also holy places, too - do we need a Category:Church buildings? Grutness... wha? 03:40, 3 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Withdrawn, this is a mistake indeed. Marcocapelle ( talk) 10:43, 3 August 2019 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Belgian awards

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 14:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, each of the categories only contains the eponymous article and a subcategory of recipients. Marcocapelle ( talk) 08:12, 20 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 10:43, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Sri Lankan awards

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 14:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, each of the categories only contains the eponymous article. Marcocapelle ( talk) 08:12, 20 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 10:43, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Furniture manufacturers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: nomination withdrawn. MER-C 18:14, 8 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: This is the parent of Category:Furniture companies by country Those categories mostly contain both manufacturers and retailers, and for most countries not separated. Many of the companies both manufacture and retail. Rathfelder ( talk) 21:27, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 10:42, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • For clarification for the closer of this discussion: this means the nomination as such has been withdrawn. Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:07, 6 August 2019 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Awards of the Western Cape

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/delete. MER-C 10:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: upmerge per WP:SMALLCAT, currently only two articles in the category and none of the other provinces of South Africa have their own category. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:52, 19 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 10:42, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Merge, and delete intermediate category which would come empty, so I have added it to the nomination. – Fayenatic London 07:06, 5 August 2019 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:World Heritage Tentative List by Bosnia and Herzegovina

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus to delete, so rename to Category:World Heritage Tentative List for Bosnia and Herzegovina. – Fayenatic London 09:44, 16 October 2019 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Category appears to have been created by a non-native speaker of English, and "...by Bosnia and Herzegovina" is clearly not correct. According to Wikipedia:Category names#State-based topics, it seems that it should be "...of Bosnia and Herzegovina", but "...in Bosnia and Herzegovina" is also a possibility. Richard3120 ( talk) 15:01, 16 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as non-defining - e.g. this characteristic isn't even mentioned in the text of the Sarajevo article. DexDor (talk) 05:33, 17 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, being on a tentative list is far from defining. Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:32, 19 July 2019 (UTC) reply
@ DexDor: @ Marcocapelle: by the same argument, do you think the category below regarding Colombia should go as well? Richard3120 ( talk) 23:36, 19 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep but Suggest "for", not by or of. These are submitted by governmental bodies, so that this is NOT WP:OR. If to be deleted, listify first. Peterkingiron ( talk) 14:49, 20 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 10:41, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - Being on Tentative list is actually quite important part of the process, a crucial step, and by that I mean it's most certainly "defining" enough no matter how we look on it from the perspective of Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I created both World Heritage Tentative List by country‎ and Category:World Heritage Tentative List by Bosnia and Herzegovina, and that "by"/"for"/"of" is most likely a slip on my part while copy/pasting, I probably wouldn't make such a glaring error even as a non-native speaker, however much more important is that I created it to make some sense of a Category:World Heritage Site Tentative list, containing 184 pages already, with various angles on the subject matter from all over the world, simply stacked there, on top of each other. So, question is, what will you do to make that category more useful and easier to navigate.-- ౪ Santa ౪ 99° 21:08, 20 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep but rename using "for" (or "of", whatever is more appropriate)-- ౪ Santa ౪ 99° 15:31, 23 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep for now While I agree that being on the tentative list isn't a defining as most of the pages in the category doesn't mention it in prose, it would be improper to delete just this subcategory as that would make navigation in Category:World Heritage Tentative List by Bosnia and Herzegovina worse. I would be infavor of deleting the whole category tree in a new nomination after listifying. Regarding the name I am in favor of "for" since it's talking about the list, not the places. There's an argument for both of and in since world heritage can include both natural and manmade object which would use of and in respecctivley per WP:CATNAME and I thus have no opinion between them. -- Trialpears ( talk) 18:06, 29 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Being on a tentative list is not remotely a defining characteristic, and generally speaking, nominations for such honors are often fluff events in and of themselves, with many nominations having no real hope of making the chosen pick. Newshunter12 ( talk) 00:04, 23 September 2019 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:World Heritage Tentative List by Colombia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus to delete, so rename to Category:World Heritage Tentative List for Colombia. – Fayenatic London 09:44, 16 October 2019 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Category appears to have been created by a non-native speaker of English, and "...by Colombia" is clearly not correct. According to Wikipedia:Category names#State-based topics, it seems that it should be "...of Colombia", but "...in Colombia" is also a possibility. Richard3120 ( talk) 14:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as non-defining - e.g. this characteristic isn't even mentioned in the text of the Ciudad Perdida article. DexDor (talk) 06:06, 20 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, being on a tentative list is far from defining. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep but Suggest "for", not by or of. I assume that these are submitted by governmental bodies, though it is not clear here, so that this is NOT WP:OR. If to be deleted, listify first. Peterkingiron ( talk) 14:51, 20 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 10:41, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • As with the discussion just above, nobody claims that this is a case of WP:OR. Marcocapelle ( talk) 10:18, 4 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per my comment above, but rename using "for" (or "of", whatever is adequate).-- ౪ Santa ౪ 99° 15:33, 23 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep for now In favor of "for". See my comment above for full opinions. -- Trialpears ( talk) 18:09, 29 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Being on a tentative list is not remotely a defining characteristic, and generally speaking, nominations for such honors are often fluff events in and of themselves, with many nominations having no real hope of making the chosen pick. Newshunter12 ( talk) 00:05, 23 September 2019 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_August_2&oldid=921539287"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE