The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Mosques completed in 1428
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:upmerge, this is an isolated year category in a tree that is otherwise merely diffused at century level until late in the 19th century.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
16:49, 8 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Universities in Sarawak
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Sabah Tshung Tsin Secondary School
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Number-one debut singles
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Overly specific confluence. Category does not give any qualification for which chart the song hit #1 on, meaning it could've been any chart whatsoever (for instance,
Too Cold at Home (song) reached #1 on the RPM charts in Canada).
Ex's & Oh's only got to #10 on the Hot 100, but got to #1 on several secondary charts. And so on. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?)16:10, 8 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Support per nom. I can also think of a couple of people who have had more than one Number-one debut singles in the same chart! --
Richhoncho (
talk)
10:09, 9 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Mayors of Selma, Alabama
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:SMALLCAT. Mayors of communities as small as Selma are not automatically notable. So the category isn't a good prospect to grow.
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof?11:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge per nom. No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when we actually have five or more articles about mayors of Selma to file in it, but a city doesn't automatically get one of these the moment just one or two former mayors happen to have articles. And as noted, Selma is not large enough that its mayors would get an automatic presumption of notability just for the fact of being mayors, if the sourcing wasn't adequate to get them over the "who have received significant press coverage" part of our criteria for local officeholders — so even of the two articles that do exist, one of them is teetering on the edge of non-notability too. Note, however, that the articles also need to be upmerged to
Category:Mayors of places in Alabama.
Bearcat (
talk)
14:02, 12 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People who have been placed under house arrest
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment It def. is for some of the people in that category,
Aung San Suu Kyi springs to mind, so maybe some of these entries need to be pruned as it's not defining to all of them, but certainly to some. Wow,
Lindsay Lohan and
Pol Pot in the same group. There's a venn diagram I thought I would never see. LugnutsFire Walk with Me
Agreement with Lugnuts plus nominate what he wrote above for CFD comment of the month. I would have never visualized that either.
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof?11:50, 8 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete, too arbitrary to determine for whom this is defining and for whom it's not.
Aung San Suu Kyi is well-categorized in the prisoners of conscience tree and in the Burmese prisoners category, based on her example I don't see a big need to diffuse prisoners by location of imprisonment.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
21:44, 8 May 2017 (UTC)*reply
Keep as creator. It's a very ironic form of punishment, and there are many laws and statues governing the practice, at least in the United States. Justice can be interesting some times, and we "Lindsay Lohan and Pol Pot walk into a bar" kind of scenario. --
Prisencolin (
talk)
19:59, 9 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. Not a useful point of comparison between Lindsay Lohan and Pol Pot — and even for Aung San Suu Kyi, I'd argue that she was much more strongly defined by being a political prisoner than by having been under house arrest per se, because the fact that she was arrested and imprisoned for her political activity is much more important and defining than whether that imprisonment happened to be in a jail or a house.
Bearcat (
talk)
01:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Mosques completed in 1428
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:upmerge, this is an isolated year category in a tree that is otherwise merely diffused at century level until late in the 19th century.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
16:49, 8 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Universities in Sarawak
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Sabah Tshung Tsin Secondary School
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Number-one debut singles
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Overly specific confluence. Category does not give any qualification for which chart the song hit #1 on, meaning it could've been any chart whatsoever (for instance,
Too Cold at Home (song) reached #1 on the RPM charts in Canada).
Ex's & Oh's only got to #10 on the Hot 100, but got to #1 on several secondary charts. And so on. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?)16:10, 8 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Support per nom. I can also think of a couple of people who have had more than one Number-one debut singles in the same chart! --
Richhoncho (
talk)
10:09, 9 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Mayors of Selma, Alabama
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:SMALLCAT. Mayors of communities as small as Selma are not automatically notable. So the category isn't a good prospect to grow.
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof?11:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge per nom. No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when we actually have five or more articles about mayors of Selma to file in it, but a city doesn't automatically get one of these the moment just one or two former mayors happen to have articles. And as noted, Selma is not large enough that its mayors would get an automatic presumption of notability just for the fact of being mayors, if the sourcing wasn't adequate to get them over the "who have received significant press coverage" part of our criteria for local officeholders — so even of the two articles that do exist, one of them is teetering on the edge of non-notability too. Note, however, that the articles also need to be upmerged to
Category:Mayors of places in Alabama.
Bearcat (
talk)
14:02, 12 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People who have been placed under house arrest
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment It def. is for some of the people in that category,
Aung San Suu Kyi springs to mind, so maybe some of these entries need to be pruned as it's not defining to all of them, but certainly to some. Wow,
Lindsay Lohan and
Pol Pot in the same group. There's a venn diagram I thought I would never see. LugnutsFire Walk with Me
Agreement with Lugnuts plus nominate what he wrote above for CFD comment of the month. I would have never visualized that either.
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof?11:50, 8 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete, too arbitrary to determine for whom this is defining and for whom it's not.
Aung San Suu Kyi is well-categorized in the prisoners of conscience tree and in the Burmese prisoners category, based on her example I don't see a big need to diffuse prisoners by location of imprisonment.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
21:44, 8 May 2017 (UTC)*reply
Keep as creator. It's a very ironic form of punishment, and there are many laws and statues governing the practice, at least in the United States. Justice can be interesting some times, and we "Lindsay Lohan and Pol Pot walk into a bar" kind of scenario. --
Prisencolin (
talk)
19:59, 9 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. Not a useful point of comparison between Lindsay Lohan and Pol Pot — and even for Aung San Suu Kyi, I'd argue that she was much more strongly defined by being a political prisoner than by having been under house arrest per se, because the fact that she was arrested and imprisoned for her political activity is much more important and defining than whether that imprisonment happened to be in a jail or a house.
Bearcat (
talk)
01:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.