The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename. –
FayenaticLondon 22:57, 28 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Last year, the company A24 Films was renamed "
A24". I would like to update the category to reflect said rebranding.
DARTHBOTTOtalk•
cont 23:03, 4 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Support The main article is
A24 (company) and specifies that the company no longer uses "Films" as part of its name.
Dimadick (
talk) 07:55, 5 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Support Irrespective of whether they rebranded to simply "A24" or are still "A24 Films", the title of A24 FIlms films is redundant.
DA1 (
talk) 16:45, 22 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Defunct organizations by country
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename. –
FayenaticLondon 23:02, 28 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Propose renaming "Category:Defunct organizations of Foo" to "Category:Defunct organizations based in Foo"
Rename all per nom.
Oculi (
talk) 10:06, 5 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Can a defunct organisation have a base?
Tim! (
talk) 07:17, 6 May 2017 (UTC)reply
It wasn't always defunct; it definitely was, at some point, based in some location.
עוד מישהוOd Mishehu 18:32, 6 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Rename all per nom. I would also really hope to see either "organization" or "organisation" nominated across the board as per consistency in the near future as well. Cheers!
Savvyjack23 (
talk) 15:34, 8 May 2017 (UTC)reply
As to the spelling of this word, see
WP:ENGVAR; the most we can expect is national-level consistency - and I'm working on that, wit 4 currently open discussions.
עוד מישהוOd Mishehu 03:05, 10 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Southern Lady Jaguars basketball
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Unpopulated, and unclear what would populate. —
swpbT 14:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Manhattan Lady Jaspers basketball
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Unpopulated, and unclear what would populate. —
swpbT 14:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Leeds University Library collections
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. –
FayenaticLondon 23:23, 28 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People from Holland, Netherlands
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete (or convert to a dab-category). The one article needs to be reassigned to one of the others, but I cannot tell which it should be.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 21:03, 6 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. We categorize Dutch people on the contemporary provinces and not on deprecated archaic terms for the former regions. The only person filed here has an article that fails to specify whether he's even from North Holland or South Holland at all, so he frankly shouldn't be filed in either of them until we can properly
verify which one is right — and this is not necessary as an alternative holding tank for people in this "unclear whether North or South" situation. (For example, if we knew that an American citizen was from either North Carolina or South Carolina but couldn't find proper verification of which, we would not create an extra "People from Carolina" to hold him.) He's already in other Dutch people categories as it is, so it's not like this is carrying the weight of being the only thing that's getting him categorized as Dutch. People are not required to be subcategorized by province or city — if we don't know which province or city to file them in, then we should just wait until we do rather than creating extra holding pens for people we're only semi-sure about.
Bearcat (
talk) 22:07, 6 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename. –
FayenaticLondon 22:57, 28 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Last year, the company A24 Films was renamed "
A24". I would like to update the category to reflect said rebranding.
DARTHBOTTOtalk•
cont 23:03, 4 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Support The main article is
A24 (company) and specifies that the company no longer uses "Films" as part of its name.
Dimadick (
talk) 07:55, 5 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Support Irrespective of whether they rebranded to simply "A24" or are still "A24 Films", the title of A24 FIlms films is redundant.
DA1 (
talk) 16:45, 22 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Defunct organizations by country
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename. –
FayenaticLondon 23:02, 28 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Propose renaming "Category:Defunct organizations of Foo" to "Category:Defunct organizations based in Foo"
Rename all per nom.
Oculi (
talk) 10:06, 5 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Can a defunct organisation have a base?
Tim! (
talk) 07:17, 6 May 2017 (UTC)reply
It wasn't always defunct; it definitely was, at some point, based in some location.
עוד מישהוOd Mishehu 18:32, 6 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Rename all per nom. I would also really hope to see either "organization" or "organisation" nominated across the board as per consistency in the near future as well. Cheers!
Savvyjack23 (
talk) 15:34, 8 May 2017 (UTC)reply
As to the spelling of this word, see
WP:ENGVAR; the most we can expect is national-level consistency - and I'm working on that, wit 4 currently open discussions.
עוד מישהוOd Mishehu 03:05, 10 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Southern Lady Jaguars basketball
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Unpopulated, and unclear what would populate. —
swpbT 14:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Manhattan Lady Jaspers basketball
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Unpopulated, and unclear what would populate. —
swpbT 14:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Leeds University Library collections
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. –
FayenaticLondon 23:23, 28 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People from Holland, Netherlands
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete (or convert to a dab-category). The one article needs to be reassigned to one of the others, but I cannot tell which it should be.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 21:03, 6 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. We categorize Dutch people on the contemporary provinces and not on deprecated archaic terms for the former regions. The only person filed here has an article that fails to specify whether he's even from North Holland or South Holland at all, so he frankly shouldn't be filed in either of them until we can properly
verify which one is right — and this is not necessary as an alternative holding tank for people in this "unclear whether North or South" situation. (For example, if we knew that an American citizen was from either North Carolina or South Carolina but couldn't find proper verification of which, we would not create an extra "People from Carolina" to hold him.) He's already in other Dutch people categories as it is, so it's not like this is carrying the weight of being the only thing that's getting him categorized as Dutch. People are not required to be subcategorized by province or city — if we don't know which province or city to file them in, then we should just wait until we do rather than creating extra holding pens for people we're only semi-sure about.
Bearcat (
talk) 22:07, 6 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.