The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Double upmerge -- Obviously. Mayors of small towns will usually be NN, so that we will only get articles if they are notable for other reasons.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
19:20, 13 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Member of telephone advisory committees India
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The members of the committee are appointed by the minister and many of those are people who had helped minister/ruling party in elections/politically . There are several such committees at federal and state government levels.
Shyamsunder (
talk)
11:12, 13 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete -- This has the feel of a performance by performer category, since it will be a part-time position.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Protected images
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support adding "Wikipedia" this is project management and not content categorization. It's not about Crown Copyrighted images or government protected dossiers --
70.51.46.39 (
talk)
05:14, 10 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:William Mitchell College of Law
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename top category, no consensus on alumni. If they are re-nominated, editors nominating/commenting would do well to give examples of precedents. –
FayenaticLondon17:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment -- The practice is to merge alumni categories for merged or renamed institutions. The headnote will need to explain this. There may be a case for keeping articles on both past institutions, as well as a separate one of the merged one, but that would only be if they were all large articles.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
19:26, 13 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Rename parent category per nom, but oppose merger of the alumni categories. I see no navigational or other benefit in obliterating the separate histories of the two predecessor colleges. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs)
11:25, 17 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Rename all to be under the current name. We use the current name and ignore the fact that seperate institutions existed in the past. We on rare occasion make excpetions when the past institution was of a different level (a high school as opposed to current college/university) but that is fairly rare. Otherwise we would get way too many overly small categories, considering some institutions of higher learning in the US have gone trhough at least 5 names, and some in Britain and elsewhere may have as well.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
05:04, 26 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Double upmerge -- Obviously. Mayors of small towns will usually be NN, so that we will only get articles if they are notable for other reasons.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
19:20, 13 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Member of telephone advisory committees India
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The members of the committee are appointed by the minister and many of those are people who had helped minister/ruling party in elections/politically . There are several such committees at federal and state government levels.
Shyamsunder (
talk)
11:12, 13 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete -- This has the feel of a performance by performer category, since it will be a part-time position.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Protected images
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support adding "Wikipedia" this is project management and not content categorization. It's not about Crown Copyrighted images or government protected dossiers --
70.51.46.39 (
talk)
05:14, 10 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:William Mitchell College of Law
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename top category, no consensus on alumni. If they are re-nominated, editors nominating/commenting would do well to give examples of precedents. –
FayenaticLondon17:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment -- The practice is to merge alumni categories for merged or renamed institutions. The headnote will need to explain this. There may be a case for keeping articles on both past institutions, as well as a separate one of the merged one, but that would only be if they were all large articles.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
19:26, 13 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Rename parent category per nom, but oppose merger of the alumni categories. I see no navigational or other benefit in obliterating the separate histories of the two predecessor colleges. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs)
11:25, 17 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Rename all to be under the current name. We use the current name and ignore the fact that seperate institutions existed in the past. We on rare occasion make excpetions when the past institution was of a different level (a high school as opposed to current college/university) but that is fairly rare. Otherwise we would get way too many overly small categories, considering some institutions of higher learning in the US have gone trhough at least 5 names, and some in Britain and elsewhere may have as well.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
05:04, 26 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.