The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Merge. Not every fictional faction of every fictional robot gang needs to be broken out separately from the rest. If kept it needs to be renamed to
Category:Guardians (Gobots) since the current name is highly ambiguous.
Jerry Pepsi (
talk) 23:33, 14 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Merge -- WE really ought not to have multiple categories for a single fictional work or franchise, save exceptionally. The present name is certainly misleading.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 18:01, 16 November 2013 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Characters by species
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename to
Category:Fictional characters by species; there is no consensus on the choice of 'species' versus 'classification' and it may be useful to revisit this issue. -- Black Falcon(
talk) 20:07, 2 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Nominating on behalf of
173.51.29.188, who had requested a rename through RM. His or her argument, which is also available on the category talk page, was: "Should be consistent with other
Category:Fictional characters." This is a procedural nomination; I am neutral.
BDD (
talk) 17:23, 14 November 2013 (UTC)reply
I'm puzzled by the notion that angels and dwarves and such are "species".
Jerry Pepsi (
talk) 23:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Dwarves are a well-established species in many sorts of fantasy settings.
rename This is better/more clear. Perhaps Jerry would prefer Fictional characters by Kingdom|Kingdom_(biology)? Species suffices, I think, in the vernacular to capture what we mean.--
Obi-Wan Kenobi (
talk) 00:42, 15 November 2013 (UTC)reply
rename not ideal, and "species" is odd nomenclature and the definition is not followed if we consider various Star Trek humanoids (e.g., Vulcans) that can intermate with humans (producing Spock for example) are, by normal definitions of "species", the same species as humans.
Carlossuarez46 (
talk) 03:49, 15 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Blue-winged Warbler and
Golden-winged Warbler are both species by the normal definition of "species", and yet
Brewster's Warbler, their hybrid, is a thing. It's species that aren't in the same genus that can't (usually) interbreed; seperate species can and do (in your example, Vulcans might well be Homo vulcanis.) Also, which of the two rename options are you supporting? -
The BushrangerOne ping only 00:17, 19 November 2013 (UTC)reply
rename to the second. "Species" is a perfectly reasonable and logical term for use in this case, although the category's actual contents are in line with "by classification". -
The BushrangerOne ping only
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Chinese railway stations
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Caribbean countries
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Consistency (of category name and scope) with most similar categories (e.g.
Category:Countries in Central America) - under the new name it should not contain countries (both subcats and articles) that merely border the Caribbean (e.g. Mexico), European countries that merely have a
dependent territory in the Caribbean (e.g. France) and things that aren't countries (e.g.
Puerto Rico - see the category's talk page). Note: If (after a few days) it looks as if this CFD will succeed then it may be best to create the new category (as a subcat of the existing category), move suitable articles/subcats down into it and change this into a delete CFD - that way articles like
Netherlands aren't temporarily wrongly categorized and only get changed once. For info: A parent
Category:Countries bordering water bodies might be deleted at some point in the future (see
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_November_6#Category:Countries_bordering_the_Atlantic_Ocean).
DexDor (
talk) 05:58, 14 November 2013 (UTC)reply
comment nomination misses certain facts, such as that various European countries have component parts of themselves (provinces, not colonies) in the Caribbean and are thus a Caribbean country.
Hmains (
talk) 06:06, 14 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Prefer --
Category:Countries of the Caribbean. The fact that Puerto Rico is a territory and a few other islands remain dependencies of an external state can be covered in a headnote, explaining that it includes such territories. "Country" can be treated as being slightly broader than "nation".
Peterkingiron (
talk) 17:43, 14 November 2013 (UTC)reply
comment and it would continue to have the same unchanged content as it has now. Not just the islands, but the continent bordering countries. They are all part of the Caribbean area by geography, culture, trade, etc.
Hmains (
talk) 03:35, 15 November 2013 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Merge. Not every fictional faction of every fictional robot gang needs to be broken out separately from the rest. If kept it needs to be renamed to
Category:Guardians (Gobots) since the current name is highly ambiguous.
Jerry Pepsi (
talk) 23:33, 14 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Merge -- WE really ought not to have multiple categories for a single fictional work or franchise, save exceptionally. The present name is certainly misleading.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 18:01, 16 November 2013 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Characters by species
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename to
Category:Fictional characters by species; there is no consensus on the choice of 'species' versus 'classification' and it may be useful to revisit this issue. -- Black Falcon(
talk) 20:07, 2 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Nominating on behalf of
173.51.29.188, who had requested a rename through RM. His or her argument, which is also available on the category talk page, was: "Should be consistent with other
Category:Fictional characters." This is a procedural nomination; I am neutral.
BDD (
talk) 17:23, 14 November 2013 (UTC)reply
I'm puzzled by the notion that angels and dwarves and such are "species".
Jerry Pepsi (
talk) 23:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Dwarves are a well-established species in many sorts of fantasy settings.
rename This is better/more clear. Perhaps Jerry would prefer Fictional characters by Kingdom|Kingdom_(biology)? Species suffices, I think, in the vernacular to capture what we mean.--
Obi-Wan Kenobi (
talk) 00:42, 15 November 2013 (UTC)reply
rename not ideal, and "species" is odd nomenclature and the definition is not followed if we consider various Star Trek humanoids (e.g., Vulcans) that can intermate with humans (producing Spock for example) are, by normal definitions of "species", the same species as humans.
Carlossuarez46 (
talk) 03:49, 15 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Blue-winged Warbler and
Golden-winged Warbler are both species by the normal definition of "species", and yet
Brewster's Warbler, their hybrid, is a thing. It's species that aren't in the same genus that can't (usually) interbreed; seperate species can and do (in your example, Vulcans might well be Homo vulcanis.) Also, which of the two rename options are you supporting? -
The BushrangerOne ping only 00:17, 19 November 2013 (UTC)reply
rename to the second. "Species" is a perfectly reasonable and logical term for use in this case, although the category's actual contents are in line with "by classification". -
The BushrangerOne ping only
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Chinese railway stations
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Caribbean countries
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Consistency (of category name and scope) with most similar categories (e.g.
Category:Countries in Central America) - under the new name it should not contain countries (both subcats and articles) that merely border the Caribbean (e.g. Mexico), European countries that merely have a
dependent territory in the Caribbean (e.g. France) and things that aren't countries (e.g.
Puerto Rico - see the category's talk page). Note: If (after a few days) it looks as if this CFD will succeed then it may be best to create the new category (as a subcat of the existing category), move suitable articles/subcats down into it and change this into a delete CFD - that way articles like
Netherlands aren't temporarily wrongly categorized and only get changed once. For info: A parent
Category:Countries bordering water bodies might be deleted at some point in the future (see
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_November_6#Category:Countries_bordering_the_Atlantic_Ocean).
DexDor (
talk) 05:58, 14 November 2013 (UTC)reply
comment nomination misses certain facts, such as that various European countries have component parts of themselves (provinces, not colonies) in the Caribbean and are thus a Caribbean country.
Hmains (
talk) 06:06, 14 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Prefer --
Category:Countries of the Caribbean. The fact that Puerto Rico is a territory and a few other islands remain dependencies of an external state can be covered in a headnote, explaining that it includes such territories. "Country" can be treated as being slightly broader than "nation".
Peterkingiron (
talk) 17:43, 14 November 2013 (UTC)reply
comment and it would continue to have the same unchanged content as it has now. Not just the islands, but the continent bordering countries. They are all part of the Caribbean area by geography, culture, trade, etc.
Hmains (
talk) 03:35, 15 November 2013 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.