The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete – Same argument as for Hallenberg above (10 Dec), namely that there is no 'overarching established category tree' whatever, and these are merely very small eponymous categories with no inclusion criteria other than some vague connection with Nortorf.
Occuli (
talk)
10:38, 10 December 2010 (UTC)reply
Keep all: I can only repeat what Bermicourt and The Bushranger have already stated. In regards to the tree, note
WP:DUCK. It is only a shame this tree can't quack, but still no reason to annihilate it.
Jared Preston (
talk)
22:19, 10 December 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Aukrug
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Langenzenn
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Rothenburg ob der Tauber
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep - I changed my vote because today there are 7 articles included in the category. IMHO by now, also considering the notable history of this little town, is sufficient to save its category. --Dэя-
Бøяg15:13, 15 December 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Israeli Krav Maga practitioners
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Software types templates
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support: These days there are many software which branch into different or specific applications. They are regarded as applications. e.g. Office or productivity, Anti-Virus, web browsers. It will be nice to keep them in a single category for easier access and neatness. --
Takamaxa (
Talk)
13:31, 9 December 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Computers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Merge Subcategories are placed under one or the other with no discernible pattern.Swap: make Computing the parent and Computer the subcategory. Categories' scope substantially overlap. Main article of parent cat is more specific than main article of subcat.
Pnm (
talk)
04:54, 9 December 2010 (UTC)reply
Yes, I support the swapping of parent and child. The sense of the word computing has probably evolved, and though its origins (in the sense we're talking about, rather than in the mathematical sense) are the physical computers themselves, IMHO computers are now a valid subcategory of computing. I also support the recategorisation of articles required to tidy things up. --
trevj (
talk)
06:19, 17 December 2010 (UTC)reply
I made some changes to the two categories along the lines of what's been discussed – everything but switching the parent–child relationship. As multiple editors noted above, the two categories were quite mixed up to begin with. I don't think I did any harm by moving ahead with it. If discussion picks up again or the closer sees a different outcome, I'll re-sort again. --
Pnm (
talk)
05:34, 6 January 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Leaders of the Communist Party of Canada (Ontario)/Labour-Progressive Party
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Heck, if we only stuck to what people actually said, we would be in trouble. (That's the entire argument against using
Category:Victoria (Australia) law and so forth -- no one really talks like that. Of course they don't -- but this is a category name, and sometimes clarity coupled with compactness is preferred over conversational felicity. But I digress ... .)
Good Ol’factory(talk)06:47, 12 December 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Maddox
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete – Same argument as for Hallenberg above (10 Dec), namely that there is no 'overarching established category tree' whatever, and these are merely very small eponymous categories with no inclusion criteria other than some vague connection with Nortorf.
Occuli (
talk)
10:38, 10 December 2010 (UTC)reply
Keep all: I can only repeat what Bermicourt and The Bushranger have already stated. In regards to the tree, note
WP:DUCK. It is only a shame this tree can't quack, but still no reason to annihilate it.
Jared Preston (
talk)
22:19, 10 December 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Aukrug
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Langenzenn
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Rothenburg ob der Tauber
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep - I changed my vote because today there are 7 articles included in the category. IMHO by now, also considering the notable history of this little town, is sufficient to save its category. --Dэя-
Бøяg15:13, 15 December 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Israeli Krav Maga practitioners
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Software types templates
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support: These days there are many software which branch into different or specific applications. They are regarded as applications. e.g. Office or productivity, Anti-Virus, web browsers. It will be nice to keep them in a single category for easier access and neatness. --
Takamaxa (
Talk)
13:31, 9 December 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Computers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Merge Subcategories are placed under one or the other with no discernible pattern.Swap: make Computing the parent and Computer the subcategory. Categories' scope substantially overlap. Main article of parent cat is more specific than main article of subcat.
Pnm (
talk)
04:54, 9 December 2010 (UTC)reply
Yes, I support the swapping of parent and child. The sense of the word computing has probably evolved, and though its origins (in the sense we're talking about, rather than in the mathematical sense) are the physical computers themselves, IMHO computers are now a valid subcategory of computing. I also support the recategorisation of articles required to tidy things up. --
trevj (
talk)
06:19, 17 December 2010 (UTC)reply
I made some changes to the two categories along the lines of what's been discussed – everything but switching the parent–child relationship. As multiple editors noted above, the two categories were quite mixed up to begin with. I don't think I did any harm by moving ahead with it. If discussion picks up again or the closer sees a different outcome, I'll re-sort again. --
Pnm (
talk)
05:34, 6 January 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Leaders of the Communist Party of Canada (Ontario)/Labour-Progressive Party
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Heck, if we only stuck to what people actually said, we would be in trouble. (That's the entire argument against using
Category:Victoria (Australia) law and so forth -- no one really talks like that. Of course they don't -- but this is a category name, and sometimes clarity coupled with compactness is preferred over conversational felicity. But I digress ... .)
Good Ol’factory(talk)06:47, 12 December 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Maddox
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.